<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mechanical Chess Opponent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/03/22/mechanical-chess-opponent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/03/22/mechanical-chess-opponent/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/03/22/mechanical-chess-opponent/#comment-1030920</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/03/22/mechanical-chess-opponent/#comment-1030920</guid>
		<description>When the wizards aren't using Hex for spell checking, they use it to play chess.
(I saw the "Hogfather" movie.
Hex has nice penmanship.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the wizards aren&#8217;t using Hex for spell checking, they use it to play chess.<br />
(I saw the &#8220;Hogfather&#8221; movie.<br />
Hex has nice penmanship.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Savard</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/03/22/mechanical-chess-opponent/#comment-1029645</link>
		<dc:creator>John Savard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/03/22/mechanical-chess-opponent/#comment-1029645</guid>
		<description>When I saw the article, I thought of the machine invented by Torres y Quevedo. It "never made a mistake" because it didn't really play a full game of Chess, only a Rook and Pawn endgame.

And so the previous comment is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw the article, I thought of the machine invented by Torres y Quevedo. It &#8220;never made a mistake&#8221; because it didn&#8217;t really play a full game of Chess, only a Rook and Pawn endgame.</p>
<p>And so the previous comment is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mward</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/03/22/mechanical-chess-opponent/#comment-38429</link>
		<dc:creator>mward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 14:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/03/22/mechanical-chess-opponent/#comment-38429</guid>
		<description>I remember reading about a "mechanical chess computer" that could solve simple endgame problems: it computed the next move for King verses King plus Rook using a simple algorithm which ensured a checkmate.

Here's a Wikipedia article about it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Ajedrecista


The board looks fine to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading about a &#8220;mechanical chess computer&#8221; that could solve simple endgame problems: it computed the next move for King verses King plus Rook using a simple algorithm which ensured a checkmate.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a Wikipedia article about it:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Ajedrecista" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Ajedrecista</a></p>
<p>The board looks fine to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
