<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electronic-Music Maestro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/06/14/electronic-music-maestro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/06/14/electronic-music-maestro/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:46:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/06/14/electronic-music-maestro/comment-page-1/#comment-1060114</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/06/14/electronic-music-maestro/#comment-1060114</guid>
		<description>I was 8 years old in 1954 when my folks bought there first organ. I think it cost $1,200.00 back then which at the time was considered a lot of money in its day.The choice was a Minshall or a Hammond M 3.They bought the Minshall because the salesman talked them into it.Later on they wished that they had bought the Hammond.The Minshall had 52 tubes in it mostly 12AU7&#039;s and was plauged with lots problems including contacts getting dirty.One summer they disconneced the built in damp chaser that came with it to conserve electricity which was a bad mistake.With in a month it was so out of tune that it could not be put back in tune.I think that we sold it as junk in 1966.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was 8 years old in 1954 when my folks bought there first organ. I think it cost $1,200.00 back then which at the time was considered a lot of money in its day.The choice was a Minshall or a Hammond M 3.They bought the Minshall because the salesman talked them into it.Later on they wished that they had bought the Hammond.The Minshall had 52 tubes in it mostly 12AU7&#8217;s and was plauged with lots problems including contacts getting dirty.One summer they disconneced the built in damp chaser that came with it to conserve electricity which was a bad mistake.With in a month it was so out of tune that it could not be put back in tune.I think that we sold it as junk in 1966.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Minshall</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/06/14/electronic-music-maestro/comment-page-1/#comment-1058070</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Minshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/06/14/electronic-music-maestro/#comment-1058070</guid>
		<description>wow it&#039;s really neat to learn about family history, that&#039;s my great grandfather. My granddad knows a lot about this stuff too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow it&#8217;s really neat to learn about family history, that&#8217;s my great grandfather. My granddad knows a lot about this stuff too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
