September 26, 2006
8 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Popular Posts | |
| Recently | Last 7 Days |
| Last 30 Days | Last Year |
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Popular Posts | |
| Recently | Last 7 Days |
| Last 30 Days | Last Year |
46 queries. 0.660 seconds.
Just to be picky; that’s KNGMTQ.
Comment by jraregris — September 26, 2006 @ 5:12 pm
This is definitely not true. I know of a radio-ham that’s even younger. He was born in 1961 therefore when this issue came out he was -5 years young.
Comment by Casandro — September 27, 2006 @ 8:03 am
she was, of course, immediately stalked by ham radio pedo’s… what was the freguency for myspace back then? har!
Comment by Jeffery Wright — October 24, 2007 @ 5:56 am
To be even pickier, the call would have been KN6MTQ, the G in the original piece had to have been a typo as ham calls would have a number designating the district. 6 would be California. The N in the call represents “novice” and if the kid successfully upgraded, the call would have become K6MTQ
Just sayin’
Tom NU4G
Comment by Tom — January 23, 2008 @ 9:52 pm
The callsign is KN6MTQ. It is a ‘6′, not a ‘G’.
Comment by Jim Young — March 17, 2008 @ 10:14 pm
Not true. Guy Mitchell, of Buckingham, IA, received his ham radio license at the age of 5 yrs., 2 months in 1977. Check “Now You’re Talking!”
Comment by Dave Babson — August 3, 2008 @ 6:25 am
My local VE Team had these two 4-yr olds… incredible! They were home schooled and filled out the Form 605 by themselves!
Stan
Comment by Stan — January 5, 2009 @ 10:36 am
Oops, forgot the URL.
http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/98/980320/#youngest
Comment by Stan — January 5, 2009 @ 10:37 am