Comments on: WORLDS YOUNGEST HAM http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/ Yesterday's tomorrow, today. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:15:36 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Stan http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/comment-page-1/#comment-1064275 Stan Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:37:20 +0000 http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/#comment-1064275 Oops, forgot the URL. http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/98/980320/#youngest Oops, forgot the URL.

http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/98/980320/#youngest

]]> By: Stan http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/comment-page-1/#comment-1064274 Stan Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:36:19 +0000 http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/#comment-1064274 My local VE Team had these two 4-yr olds... incredible! They were home schooled and filled out the Form 605 by themselves! Stan My local VE Team had these two 4-yr olds… incredible! They were home schooled and filled out the Form 605 by themselves!

Stan

]]> By: Dave Babson http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/comment-page-1/#comment-1059051 Dave Babson Sun, 03 Aug 2008 13:25:13 +0000 http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/#comment-1059051 Not true. Guy Mitchell, of Buckingham, IA, received his ham radio license at the age of 5 yrs., 2 months in 1977. Check "Now You're Talking!" Not true. Guy Mitchell, of Buckingham, IA, received his ham radio license at the age of 5 yrs., 2 months in 1977. Check “Now You’re Talking!”

]]> By: Jim Young http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/comment-page-1/#comment-1049140 Jim Young Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:14:54 +0000 http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/#comment-1049140 The callsign is KN6MTQ. It is a '6', not a 'G'. The callsign is KN6MTQ. It is a ‘6′, not a ‘G’.

]]> By: Tom http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/comment-page-1/#comment-1044141 Tom Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:52:35 +0000 http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/#comment-1044141 To be even pickier, the call would have been KN6MTQ, the G in the original piece had to have been a typo as ham calls would have a number designating the district. 6 would be California. The N in the call represents "novice" and if the kid successfully upgraded, the call would have become K6MTQ Just sayin' Tom NU4G To be even pickier, the call would have been KN6MTQ, the G in the original piece had to have been a typo as ham calls would have a number designating the district. 6 would be California. The N in the call represents “novice” and if the kid successfully upgraded, the call would have become K6MTQ

Just sayin’

Tom NU4G

]]> By: Jeffery Wright http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/comment-page-1/#comment-637492 Jeffery Wright Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:56:27 +0000 http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/#comment-637492 she was, of course, immediately stalked by ham radio pedo's... what was the freguency for myspace back then? har! she was, of course, immediately stalked by ham radio pedo’s… what was the freguency for myspace back then? har!

]]> By: Casandro http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/comment-page-1/#comment-12864 Casandro Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:03:21 +0000 http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/#comment-12864 This is definitely not true. I know of a radio-ham that's even younger. He was born in 1961 therefore when this issue came out he was -5 years young. This is definitely not true. I know of a radio-ham that’s even younger. He was born in 1961 therefore when this issue came out he was -5 years young.

]]> By: jraregris http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/comment-page-1/#comment-12742 jraregris Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:12:45 +0000 http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/09/26/worlds-youngest-ham/#comment-12742 Just to be picky; that's KNGMTQ. Just to be picky; that’s KNGMTQ.

]]>