<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FUTURE GI  (May, 1959)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/02/future-gi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/02/future-gi/</link>
	<description>Yesterday&#039;s tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:33:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/02/future-gi/comment-page-1/#comment-1070862</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/02/future-gi/#comment-1070862</guid>
		<description>JMyint: No it isn&#039;t.  The Army&#039;s testing for the AR-10 had already ended disastrously in 1957 when the barrel burst.  Also the handguards don&#039;t match the AR-10 but rather match the photos in &lt;em&gt;The Black Rifle&lt;/em&gt; available through Collector&#039;s Grade publications http://www.collectorgrade.com/bookshelf4.html on page 59 I think you&#039;ll find.

Also the reinforcing grooves on the magazine only run vertically.  The AR-10 had a &quot;waffle pattern&quot; of vertical and horizontal reinforcement on the magazine.

Check out the page that you linked to.  They either have M-14 mags or the original waffle pattern.

Also check out pages 39 &amp; 40 of the PDF document at http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/AD301918</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JMyint: No it isn&#8217;t.  The Army&#8217;s testing for the AR-10 had already ended disastrously in 1957 when the barrel burst.  Also the handguards don&#8217;t match the AR-10 but rather match the photos in <em>The Black Rifle</em> available through Collector&#8217;s Grade publications <a href="http://www.collectorgrade.com/bookshelf4.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.collectorgrade.com/bookshelf4.html</a> on page 59 I think you&#8217;ll find.</p>
<p>Also the reinforcing grooves on the magazine only run vertically.  The AR-10 had a &#8220;waffle pattern&#8221; of vertical and horizontal reinforcement on the magazine.</p>
<p>Check out the page that you linked to.  They either have M-14 mags or the original waffle pattern.</p>
<p>Also check out pages 39 &#038; 40 of the PDF document at <a href="http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/AD301918" rel="nofollow">http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/AD301918</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMyint</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/02/future-gi/comment-page-1/#comment-1070860</link>
		<dc:creator>JMyint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/02/future-gi/#comment-1070860</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an AR-10 Rifle Eugene Stoner&#039;s previous design.

world.guns.ru/assault/as16-e.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an AR-10 Rifle Eugene Stoner&#8217;s previous design.</p>
<p>world.guns.ru/assault/as16-e.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/02/future-gi/comment-page-1/#comment-1070859</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/02/future-gi/#comment-1070859</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s an example of the very earliest version of the AR-15.  If you look closely you&#039;ll see that the cocking handle is in the handgrip on top of the weapon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s an example of the very earliest version of the AR-15.  If you look closely you&#8217;ll see that the cocking handle is in the handgrip on top of the weapon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/02/future-gi/comment-page-1/#comment-1070858</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/02/future-gi/#comment-1070858</guid>
		<description>Is that a ar-15 prototype in his hands?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that a ar-15 prototype in his hands?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stannous</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/02/future-gi/comment-page-1/#comment-17599</link>
		<dc:creator>Stannous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 03:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/02/future-gi/#comment-17599</guid>
		<description>pretty accurate but not much help in the mentioned &#039;atomic war&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty accurate but not much help in the mentioned &#8216;atomic war&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

