<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super-Gun for Modern Crime Fighters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:55:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/comment-page-1/#comment-1070759</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/#comment-1070759</guid>
		<description>Roger Knights:  The &quot;SKS assault rifle on NATO&quot;??  Are you kidding?  I&#039;m sure that you mean the 7.62mm NATO cartridge. The SKS of course being a Soviet rifle (but you knew that). NATO coiuntries adopted their own weapons to fire the 7.62 NATO (but you knew that too).  I hope the article doesn&#039;t put it that way.  By the way the forward assist was an improvement on the action.  Take it from someone who carried an M-16.  Every previous infantry rifle had a means of pushing the bolt forward.

neoatomica: Bullet shouldn&#039;t be lubricated, it was the AR-15 NOT the M-15 (actually, the Squad Automatic Rifle version of the M-14 don&#039;t you know).  It&#039;s a myth that bullets &quot;knock people down&quot; 7.62 or otherwise.

Tim Tracy:  A lot of the &quot;flaws&quot; that amateurs keep harping about were fixed a long time ago, but that doesn&#039;t stop bloggers and even people in uniform from  repeating them over and over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger Knights:  The &#8220;SKS assault rifle on NATO&#8221;??  Are you kidding?  I&#8217;m sure that you mean the 7.62mm NATO cartridge. The SKS of course being a Soviet rifle (but you knew that). NATO coiuntries adopted their own weapons to fire the 7.62 NATO (but you knew that too).  I hope the article doesn&#8217;t put it that way.  By the way the forward assist was an improvement on the action.  Take it from someone who carried an M-16.  Every previous infantry rifle had a means of pushing the bolt forward.</p>
<p>neoatomica: Bullet shouldn&#8217;t be lubricated, it was the AR-15 NOT the M-15 (actually, the Squad Automatic Rifle version of the M-14 don&#8217;t you know).  It&#8217;s a myth that bullets &#8220;knock people down&#8221; 7.62 or otherwise.</p>
<p>Tim Tracy:  A lot of the &#8220;flaws&#8221; that amateurs keep harping about were fixed a long time ago, but that doesn&#8217;t stop bloggers and even people in uniform from  repeating them over and over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie snook</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/comment-page-1/#comment-1070758</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie snook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/#comment-1070758</guid>
		<description>I have commented here before.  The author of this article was my father.  If anyone knows of any other sites where his articles can be read, could you please let me know?  Thank you, Stephanie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have commented here before.  The author of this article was my father.  If anyone knows of any other sites where his articles can be read, could you please let me know?  Thank you, Stephanie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Tracy</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/comment-page-1/#comment-1058374</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/#comment-1058374</guid>
		<description>The flaws of the military version, M16 are are well documented.  These flaws were almost all of them the result of changes made by the military to the design and manufacture of the AR15 to adapt it to their specs and requirements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flaws of the military version, M16 are are well documented.  These flaws were almost all of them the result of changes made by the military to the design and manufacture of the AR15 to adapt it to their specs and requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie snook</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/comment-page-1/#comment-1053914</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie snook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 01:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/#comment-1053914</guid>
		<description>My father wrote this article and I must say, I have just now read it.  I am proud of all he did and all he wrote......this was just the beginning of his life of writing.  If anyone is interested in anything more he wrote, they are welcome to contact me at rivermaggie@hotmail.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My father wrote this article and I must say, I have just now read it.  I am proud of all he did and all he wrote&#8230;&#8230;this was just the beginning of his life of writing.  If anyone is interested in anything more he wrote, they are welcome to contact me at <a href="mailto:rivermaggie@hotmail.com">rivermaggie@hotmail.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Knights</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/comment-page-1/#comment-1021395</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Knights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 07:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/#comment-1021395</guid>
		<description>In the June 1981 Atlantic magazine, James Fallows published &quot;M-16: A Bureaucratic Horror Story.&quot; It described how the Army&#039;s ordnance department, feathers ruffled from having foisted the unworkable (too heavy a caliber) SKS assault rifle on NATO over the protests of the British and others, who wanted a light-caliber round similar to what the Germans and Russians had used effectively in WW II, sabotaged the AR-15 by inserting three requirements over the frenzied protests of its designer, a genius named Stoner at Armalite. 

The barrel twist had to be increased to improve accuracy 9but this halved lethality); the ammunition had to be changed to a dirty-burning compound from Olin (because it was similar to the powder used in other weapons); and an insertion-assist had to be added to force home recalcitrant rounds (this added zero to effectiveness, but increased cost and weight). 

The original weapon, which can be bought from Armalite, is as good as the article says. But the Army still wouldn&#039;t back down from its mistaken specs, even after the hearings exposed the Ordnance dept.&#039;s blunder. &quot;The system&quot; protects its own--and it recognized blood-brothers in the mediocrity and petty gamesmanship of the blunderers.

Fallowsâ€™ article isnâ€™t available online yet, Fallows explains in his thread on the Atlanticâ€™s site that articles from that date have to be scanned in and are still in a legal limbo. But you can obtain it by interlibrary loanâ€”they may even make a free copy for you and mail it to you. Check with your library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the June 1981 Atlantic magazine, James Fallows published &#8220;M-16: A Bureaucratic Horror Story.&#8221; It described how the Army&#8217;s ordnance department, feathers ruffled from having foisted the unworkable (too heavy a caliber) SKS assault rifle on NATO over the protests of the British and others, who wanted a light-caliber round similar to what the Germans and Russians had used effectively in WW II, sabotaged the AR-15 by inserting three requirements over the frenzied protests of its designer, a genius named Stoner at Armalite. </p>
<p>The barrel twist had to be increased to improve accuracy 9but this halved lethality); the ammunition had to be changed to a dirty-burning compound from Olin (because it was similar to the powder used in other weapons); and an insertion-assist had to be added to force home recalcitrant rounds (this added zero to effectiveness, but increased cost and weight). </p>
<p>The original weapon, which can be bought from Armalite, is as good as the article says. But the Army still wouldn&#8217;t back down from its mistaken specs, even after the hearings exposed the Ordnance dept.&#8217;s blunder. &#8220;The system&#8221; protects its own&#8211;and it recognized blood-brothers in the mediocrity and petty gamesmanship of the blunderers.</p>
<p>Fallowsâ€™ article isnâ€™t available online yet, Fallows explains in his thread on the Atlanticâ€™s site that articles from that date have to be scanned in and are still in a legal limbo. But you can obtain it by interlibrary loanâ€”they may even make a free copy for you and mail it to you. Check with your library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neoatomica</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/comment-page-1/#comment-49812</link>
		<dc:creator>neoatomica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/#comment-49812</guid>
		<description>The m16 is not the m15. When first introduced he m16 did not have a chromed barrel and would jam way too much because of that. also the lubricant on the bullets became sticky and would jam the gun further. The enviroment also sucked for this weapon. The cartrige still has its faults and should be redesigined, it lacks stopping power regardless of its hydrostatic shock. It will not knock a man over like the 7.62.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The m16 is not the m15. When first introduced he m16 did not have a chromed barrel and would jam way too much because of that. also the lubricant on the bullets became sticky and would jam the gun further. The enviroment also sucked for this weapon. The cartrige still has its faults and should be redesigined, it lacks stopping power regardless of its hydrostatic shock. It will not knock a man over like the 7.62.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; What a firearm1</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/comment-page-1/#comment-49802</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; What a firearm1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/#comment-49802</guid>
		<description>[...] To good to be true? “Hey,” one of the officers asked, “aren’t you going to clean it?” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To good to be true? “Hey,” one of the officers asked, “aren’t you going to clean it?” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stannous</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/comment-page-1/#comment-20713</link>
		<dc:creator>Stannous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/11/15/super-gun-for-modern-crime-fighters/#comment-20713</guid>
		<description>â€œOh,â€ Murphy grinned as he snapped the box shut, â€œdidnâ€™t I tell you? The whole gun is non-corrosive, even under a salt water spray, and the lubricants are permanently fused into the metal. Itâ€™ll never need oil, and dirt canâ€™t stick to any of the moving parts. Bury it in sand, dig it up, bang the butt on the ground once to clean it out, and itâ€™ll work like a hundred-dollar watch.â€
My sweet ass!
As the M-16 this weapon was notorious for troubles in the swamps and jungles of Vietnam for jamming. It took several years to work out the problems and cost lots of grunts their lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œOh,â€ Murphy grinned as he snapped the box shut, â€œdidnâ€™t I tell you? The whole gun is non-corrosive, even under a salt water spray, and the lubricants are permanently fused into the metal. Itâ€™ll never need oil, and dirt canâ€™t stick to any of the moving parts. Bury it in sand, dig it up, bang the butt on the ground once to clean it out, and itâ€™ll work like a hundred-dollar watch.â€<br />
My sweet ass!<br />
As the M-16 this weapon was notorious for troubles in the swamps and jungles of Vietnam for jamming. It took several years to work out the problems and cost lots of grunts their lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
