<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HOW CAMERA SHUTTERS WORK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/03/16/how-camera-shutters-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/03/16/how-camera-shutters-work/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/03/16/how-camera-shutters-work/#comment-1052579</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/03/16/how-camera-shutters-work/#comment-1052579</guid>
		<description>Wow. At the time of this writing the Leica and the Contax did exist with "modern" focal plane shutters. They only give one sentence to this type .. apparently cutting edge! 
I like the writing style very efficient, but sufficient. The advantages and disadvantages 
remain.. only modernization has narrowed these to the point of preference.
A lot of terminolgy remains ... barrel lenses, between-the-shutter. Dial-set etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. At the time of this writing the Leica and the Contax did exist with &#8220;modern&#8221; focal plane shutters. They only give one sentence to this type .. apparently cutting edge!<br />
I like the writing style very efficient, but sufficient. The advantages and disadvantages<br />
remain.. only modernization has narrowed these to the point of preference.<br />
A lot of terminolgy remains &#8230; barrel lenses, between-the-shutter. Dial-set etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
