<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: POCKET STEREOSCOPE  (Jul, 1933)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/09/pocket-stereoscope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/09/pocket-stereoscope/</link>
	<description>Yesterday&#039;s tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:12:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toronto</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/09/pocket-stereoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-1078022</link>
		<dc:creator>Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 03:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/09/pocket-stereoscope/#comment-1078022</guid>
		<description>Post Cereal gave away somewhat similar 3d viewers in the early &#039;60s. If I recall, you got the viewer for 3 box tops, and a slide or two in every box. Probably half-frame 35mm film.

I had a whole set of dinosaur slides. Post cereals were mostly crap, but they had the best bonuses and the best cartoons.

(Actually, Shredded Wheat/Shreddies had the best promotional items - things like checker sets and sets of fighter planes (1:288 or smaller), etc. But what kid ate those?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post Cereal gave away somewhat similar 3d viewers in the early &#8217;60s. If I recall, you got the viewer for 3 box tops, and a slide or two in every box. Probably half-frame 35mm film.</p>
<p>I had a whole set of dinosaur slides. Post cereals were mostly crap, but they had the best bonuses and the best cartoons.</p>
<p>(Actually, Shredded Wheat/Shreddies had the best promotional items &#8211; things like checker sets and sets of fighter planes (1:288 or smaller), etc. But what kid ate those?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew L. Ayers</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/09/pocket-stereoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-1078016</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew L. Ayers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 22:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/09/pocket-stereoscope/#comment-1078016</guid>
		<description>I own one of these (or one really similar). I found it an antique store; it came with one roll of images (but the roll has been stored for so long that I don&#039;t dare to try to unroll it) - its about the same vintage, from what I remember. I consider it a part of my &quot;virtual reality&quot; collection...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own one of these (or one really similar). I found it an antique store; it came with one roll of images (but the roll has been stored for so long that I don&#8217;t dare to try to unroll it) &#8211; its about the same vintage, from what I remember. I consider it a part of my &#8220;virtual reality&#8221; collection&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/09/pocket-stereoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-124011</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/09/pocket-stereoscope/#comment-124011</guid>
		<description>Re #1:

The viewmaster reel transpanencies are way smaller than 35mm.

16mm or some proprietary scale.

Re #2

I&#039;ll check that out. Thanks.

*********

The guys who developed HDTV, should have made 3DTV instead.

Supposedly at a recent Consumer Electronics Show, LG, the maker of LCD TVs amoung other things, demonstrated a goggelless 3D large screen LCD.

I suspect to get the left eye/right eye seperation, the viewers would have to be in designated areas in front of the screen.

(My ascii-fu is weak but something like this...)

*****L*R***L*R***L*R***L*R*****

****(@^@)*******(@^@)**********

where bands of left eye image and right eye image areas from the screen have to meet the viewers&#039; appropriate eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re #1:</p>
<p>The viewmaster reel transpanencies are way smaller than 35mm.</p>
<p>16mm or some proprietary scale.</p>
<p>Re #2</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll check that out. Thanks.</p>
<p>*********</p>
<p>The guys who developed HDTV, should have made 3DTV instead.</p>
<p>Supposedly at a recent Consumer Electronics Show, LG, the maker of LCD TVs amoung other things, demonstrated a goggelless 3D large screen LCD.</p>
<p>I suspect to get the left eye/right eye seperation, the viewers would have to be in designated areas in front of the screen.</p>
<p>(My ascii-fu is weak but something like this&#8230;)</p>
<p>*****L*R***L*R***L*R***L*R*****</p>
<p>****(@^@)*******(@^@)**********</p>
<p>where bands of left eye image and right eye image areas from the screen have to meet the viewers&#8217; appropriate eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/09/pocket-stereoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-123424</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/09/pocket-stereoscope/#comment-123424</guid>
		<description>Very cool site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stannous</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/09/pocket-stereoscope/comment-page-1/#comment-123329</link>
		<dc:creator>Stannous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/09/pocket-stereoscope/#comment-123329</guid>
		<description>you&#039;re absolutely right, I think the Viewmaster even uses 35mm film.

Check out this 3D viewer site- lots of vintage stuff!
http://www.3dstereo.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you&#8217;re absolutely right, I think the Viewmaster even uses 35mm film.</p>
<p>Check out this 3D viewer site- lots of vintage stuff!<br />
<a href="http://www.3dstereo.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.3dstereo.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

