<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Don&#8217;t We Have&#8230; Baby Assault Tanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/13/why-dont-we-have-baby-assault-tanks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/13/why-dont-we-have-baby-assault-tanks/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Baby Assault Tanks &#187; Needcoffee.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/13/why-dont-we-have-baby-assault-tanks/#comment-1052136</link>
		<dc:creator>Baby Assault Tanks &#187; Needcoffee.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 23:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/13/why-dont-we-have-baby-assault-tanks/#comment-1052136</guid>
		<description>[...] Debate sparked by Modern Mechanix. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Debate sparked by Modern Mechanix. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emcha</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/13/why-dont-we-have-baby-assault-tanks/#comment-128593</link>
		<dc:creator>Emcha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 14:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/13/why-dont-we-have-baby-assault-tanks/#comment-128593</guid>
		<description>Just bringing up "good" old MG tanks of 1930s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just bringing up &#8220;good&#8221; old MG tanks of 1930s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
