<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pinocchio the Puppet  (Feb, 1940)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/</link>
	<description>Yesterday&#039;s tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-1076905</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/#comment-1076905</guid>
		<description>Jerrold: It&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.estatetrinketsandtreasures.com/enesco-catalog.html#1995&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1995 ENESCO&lt;/a&gt; that originally had a MSRP of $350.  The design has been retired but you can contact ENESCO Customer Service at http://www.enesco.com/contact_us.php and ask your questions about your &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Presenting...Pinocchio&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; Model #596302</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerrold: It&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.estatetrinketsandtreasures.com/enesco-catalog.html#1995" rel="nofollow">1995 ENESCO</a> that originally had a MSRP of $350.  The design has been retired but you can contact ENESCO Customer Service at <a href="http://www.enesco.com/contact_us.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.enesco.com/contact_us.php</a> and ask your questions about your <em><strong>Presenting&#8230;Pinocchio</strong></em> Model #596302</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerrold</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-1076882</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerrold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 20:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/#comment-1076882</guid>
		<description>http://www.schiffkey.com/wdp1.JPG

Can&#039;t find this anywhere (Pinocchio in the workshop).
Anyway to figure out where it came from?

 
Is there a way to estimate how much this clock would cost to repair? Found a power adapter. The music plays (well, repeatedly) but the curtain does not close and I have not been able to put up with the music long enough to see if the clock works (ticks)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.schiffkey.com/wdp1.JPG" rel="nofollow">http://www.schiffkey.com/wdp1.JPG</a></p>
<p>Can&#8217;t find this anywhere (Pinocchio in the workshop).<br />
Anyway to figure out where it came from?</p>
<p>Is there a way to estimate how much this clock would cost to repair? Found a power adapter. The music plays (well, repeatedly) but the curtain does not close and I have not been able to put up with the music long enough to see if the clock works (ticks)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-1074860</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/#comment-1074860</guid>
		<description>Bendarr: But like the link also said, they weren&#039;t in a position to do that.  They didn&#039;t actually prosecute anyone that I&#039;m aware of, they just told them to take it down.  I feel in that case, as bad as it sounds that they had no choice.  The history is clear, if you don&#039;t vigorously defend a trademark it becomes generic or you lose it.

Wiki entry on Trademark Infringement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark_infringement

A similar issue is genericized trademarks.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark_genericization  Most people are surprised to find out that words like aspirin, zipper and cellophane were originally trademarked brand names starting with capital letters.  Over the years they lost their status of only applying to a particular brand.  I can appreciate how the Bayer company never defended their registered trademark of Heroin (but that&#039;s another story).

That story regarding Disney and the daycare center was from 1989 and I suspect that you hadn&#039;t heard about it before I provided that link.  I think that black eye healed a long time ago and people still buy Disney merchandise.  And to think they did it without your legal or public relations advice!  Amazing.

Bottom line, Disney did what they reasonably believed that they had to do under the law.  It&#039;s not just Disney, I&#039;d defend any creative person wanting to defend their intellectual property.
 If you created something and trademarked it you can do what you like.  But if you choose to defend it, I&#039;ll be cheering you on from critics disparaging you on the amount of &quot;force&quot; you use to &quot;squash&quot; moves, or acting on people even &quot;thinking&quot; about infringing on your work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bendarr: But like the link also said, they weren&#8217;t in a position to do that.  They didn&#8217;t actually prosecute anyone that I&#8217;m aware of, they just told them to take it down.  I feel in that case, as bad as it sounds that they had no choice.  The history is clear, if you don&#8217;t vigorously defend a trademark it becomes generic or you lose it.</p>
<p>Wiki entry on Trademark Infringement <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark_infringement" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T.....fringement</a></p>
<p>A similar issue is genericized trademarks.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark_genericization" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T.....ricization</a>  Most people are surprised to find out that words like aspirin, zipper and cellophane were originally trademarked brand names starting with capital letters.  Over the years they lost their status of only applying to a particular brand.  I can appreciate how the Bayer company never defended their registered trademark of Heroin (but that&#8217;s another story).</p>
<p>That story regarding Disney and the daycare center was from 1989 and I suspect that you hadn&#8217;t heard about it before I provided that link.  I think that black eye healed a long time ago and people still buy Disney merchandise.  And to think they did it without your legal or public relations advice!  Amazing.</p>
<p>Bottom line, Disney did what they reasonably believed that they had to do under the law.  It&#8217;s not just Disney, I&#8217;d defend any creative person wanting to defend their intellectual property.<br />
 If you created something and trademarked it you can do what you like.  But if you choose to defend it, I&#8217;ll be cheering you on from critics disparaging you on the amount of &#8220;force&#8221; you use to &#8220;squash&#8221; moves, or acting on people even &#8220;thinking&#8221; about infringing on your work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bendarr</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-1074859</link>
		<dc:creator>Bendarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/#comment-1074859</guid>
		<description>Firebrand38:

I agree that Disney does have the right to defend trademarks.  However I feel that Disney&#039;s bad rap is for the amount of force that they use.  As for example that you linked to.  I feel that Disney legal department made a mistake and was too overenthusiastic.  What Disney could have done is state &quot;yes, it is a trademark infringement but we won&#039;t pursue prosecution in this case.  We would like to state that we are not affiliated with this day care center however.&quot;  End result?  The Day care would have been able to keep the characters as painted and Disney would have avoided a black eye in it&#039;s reputation.  Because of that act the Disney legal department (and by association the rest of Disney itself)  has a less than sterling reputation.

Wiki entry on Copyright Term Extension act:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Term_Extension_Act

So judging from the chart, Pinocchio will remain under copyright until about 2035.  Thus giving ( I Feel) the Disney Legal department and by extension Disney itself more than enough time to either sully Disney&#039;s reputation or make some changes and show a more human face and less of a faceless Corporation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firebrand38:</p>
<p>I agree that Disney does have the right to defend trademarks.  However I feel that Disney&#8217;s bad rap is for the amount of force that they use.  As for example that you linked to.  I feel that Disney legal department made a mistake and was too overenthusiastic.  What Disney could have done is state &#8220;yes, it is a trademark infringement but we won&#8217;t pursue prosecution in this case.  We would like to state that we are not affiliated with this day care center however.&#8221;  End result?  The Day care would have been able to keep the characters as painted and Disney would have avoided a black eye in it&#8217;s reputation.  Because of that act the Disney legal department (and by association the rest of Disney itself)  has a less than sterling reputation.</p>
<p>Wiki entry on Copyright Term Extension act:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Term_Extension_Act" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C.....ension_Act</a></p>
<p>So judging from the chart, Pinocchio will remain under copyright until about 2035.  Thus giving ( I Feel) the Disney Legal department and by extension Disney itself more than enough time to either sully Disney&#8217;s reputation or make some changes and show a more human face and less of a faceless Corporation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-1074857</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/#comment-1074857</guid>
		<description>Bendarr: No doubt that it&#039;s a litigious society, but I think Disney gets a bad rap for protecting their property.  Trademarks are a  fleeting thing unless they&#039;re defended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bendarr: No doubt that it&#8217;s a litigious society, but I think Disney gets a bad rap for protecting their property.  Trademarks are a  fleeting thing unless they&#8217;re defended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bendarr</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-1074856</link>
		<dc:creator>Bendarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/#comment-1074856</guid>
		<description>I guess my general point is that now a days you wouldn&#039;t see plans for constructing a duplicate of a Disney item in a magazine that wasn&#039;t published by Disney.  The legal department from Disney would squash such a move by a magazine to publish such a plan.  For example in Second Life you cannot build a vehicle that is a copy of an existing vehicle.  Even if it&#039;s for personal use only.  You can&#039;t even say that your creation is &quot;Based on&quot; or &quot;Inspired by&quot; in your description without running into trademark trouble.  Thus I feel that plans like this wouldn&#039;t be published in our now lawyer happy society that we live in which I feel (at least in some circumstances) not for the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess my general point is that now a days you wouldn&#8217;t see plans for constructing a duplicate of a Disney item in a magazine that wasn&#8217;t published by Disney.  The legal department from Disney would squash such a move by a magazine to publish such a plan.  For example in Second Life you cannot build a vehicle that is a copy of an existing vehicle.  Even if it&#8217;s for personal use only.  You can&#8217;t even say that your creation is &#8220;Based on&#8221; or &#8220;Inspired by&#8221; in your description without running into trademark trouble.  Thus I feel that plans like this wouldn&#8217;t be published in our now lawyer happy society that we live in which I feel (at least in some circumstances) not for the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-1074853</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/#comment-1074853</guid>
		<description>Bendarr: I dunno, sounds like&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.snopes.com/disney/wdco/daycare.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; defending a trademark&lt;/a&gt; to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bendarr: I dunno, sounds like<a href="http://www.snopes.com/disney/wdco/daycare.asp" rel="nofollow"> defending a trademark</a> to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bendarr</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-1074850</link>
		<dc:creator>Bendarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/#comment-1074850</guid>
		<description>Wow, now a days you even contemplate duplicating something of Disney you get a visit from their legal department.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, now a days you even contemplate duplicating something of Disney you get a visit from their legal department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coreen</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-1072911</link>
		<dc:creator>Coreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/#comment-1072911</guid>
		<description>pinocchio is like the best ever.! i watch the dvd every night . . i love it!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pinocchio is like the best ever.! i watch the dvd every night . . i love it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hi Sibley &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hi Sibley Bibliography</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-1048476</link>
		<dc:creator>Hi Sibley &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hi Sibley Bibliography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/#comment-1048476</guid>
		<description>[...] Pinnochio the Puppet Popular Science v. 136 (February 1940) pp. 180-181 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pinnochio the Puppet Popular Science v. 136 (February 1940) pp. 180-181 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auxiliary Memory</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-139541</link>
		<dc:creator>Auxiliary Memory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/#comment-139541</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A cute little clock for a scroll saw project...&lt;/strong&gt;

Modern Mechanix ? Pinocchio the Puppet Here is a cool little project that I can use as my first project with the little scroll saw I picked up at the thrift store last week. I just need to wait for......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A cute little clock for a scroll saw project&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Modern Mechanix ? Pinocchio the Puppet Here is a cool little project that I can use as my first project with the little scroll saw I picked up at the thrift store last week. I just need to wait for&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAKE: Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/comment-page-1/#comment-137058</link>
		<dc:creator>MAKE: Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/04/19/pinocchio-the-puppet/#comment-137058</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wood horn, early answering machine, $100 submarine, alarm clocks, 4 year old pilot - make a pinocchio puppet...&lt;/strong&gt;

Take a tour of yesterday&#039;s future today -- Horns made from tree trunks give odd musical tones - Link. Phone calls answered by machine - Link. $100 submarine - Link. Odd devices wake sleepers who scorn alarm clocks - Link.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wood horn, early answering machine, $100 submarine, alarm clocks, 4 year old pilot &#8211; make a pinocchio puppet&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Take a tour of yesterday&#8217;s future today &#8212; Horns made from tree trunks give odd musical tones &#8211; Link. Phone calls answered by machine &#8211; Link. $100 submarine &#8211; Link. Odd devices wake sleepers who scorn alarm clocks &#8211; Link&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

