<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New &#8220;Camera&#8221; Makes X-Ray Movies  (Jul, 1939)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/05/10/new-camera-makes-x-ray-movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/05/10/new-camera-makes-x-ray-movies/</link>
	<description>Yesterday&#039;s tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NikFromNYC</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/05/10/new-camera-makes-x-ray-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-1023980</link>
		<dc:creator>NikFromNYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/05/10/new-camera-makes-x-ray-movies/#comment-1023980</guid>
		<description>I used to be a chemistry PhD student. And the top (at least biggest group and biggest ego...who had angels painted on a sky-filled ceiling in his master bedroom), predicted, off-hand, via the statement &quot;well, we don&#039;t have x-ray movies yet.&quot; What he MEANT was x-ray *crystallography* movies that showed how molecules move if your watch included a nano (actually femto) second dial. And the new millennium we have not one but two of those technologies now available. One is the ability to take a &quot;crystal structure&quot; (AKA Crick and Watson DNA=Helix Nobel Prize) using *one* molecule in some sort of vacuum chamber, but also some other thing I forget. The big breakthrough though is that it was TOO HARD to &quot;crystallize&quot; the most important medical pill worthy proteins, since they were, in a cell, imbedded in the soap-bubble-like cell membrane, but they wouldn&#039;t crystallize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to be a chemistry PhD student. And the top (at least biggest group and biggest ego&#8230;who had angels painted on a sky-filled ceiling in his master bedroom), predicted, off-hand, via the statement &#8220;well, we don&#8217;t have x-ray movies yet.&#8221; What he MEANT was x-ray *crystallography* movies that showed how molecules move if your watch included a nano (actually femto) second dial. And the new millennium we have not one but two of those technologies now available. One is the ability to take a &#8220;crystal structure&#8221; (AKA Crick and Watson DNA=Helix Nobel Prize) using *one* molecule in some sort of vacuum chamber, but also some other thing I forget. The big breakthrough though is that it was TOO HARD to &#8220;crystallize&#8221; the most important medical pill worthy proteins, since they were, in a cell, imbedded in the soap-bubble-like cell membrane, but they wouldn&#8217;t crystallize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

