<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kinsey&#8217;s Study of Female Sex Behavior</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jinxdefenestrated</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/#comment-222083</link>
		<dc:creator>jinxdefenestrated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/#comment-222083</guid>
		<description>apparently caya thinks that female sexuality has absolutely no scientific relevance; however, I am a women, and disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apparently caya thinks that female sexuality has absolutely no scientific relevance; however, I am a women, and disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stannous</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/#comment-221483</link>
		<dc:creator>Stannous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/#comment-221483</guid>
		<description>I'm pretty surprised to see this depth of coverage in that old a Cosmo.

I remember reading a study of the dates of births as they relate to marriages and in the conservative Massachusetts Bay Colony and in the early 1700's about 30% of babies were born less than 9 months after the ceremony.

Nothing new under the covers (except maybe the lies about it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty surprised to see this depth of coverage in that old a Cosmo.</p>
<p>I remember reading a study of the dates of births as they relate to marriages and in the conservative Massachusetts Bay Colony and in the early 1700&#8217;s about 30% of babies were born less than 9 months after the ceremony.</p>
<p>Nothing new under the covers (except maybe the lies about it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caya</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/#comment-220069</link>
		<dc:creator>Caya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/#comment-220069</guid>
		<description>This blog is becoming rather trashy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog is becoming rather trashy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blurgle</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/#comment-219817</link>
		<dc:creator>Blurgle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 12:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/#comment-219817</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So, when this Kinsey report says, â€œ40 per cent of our sample were nonvirgins before marriage,â€ â€œadultery had been committed by 25 per cent or more of the married women by the age of forty,â€ â€œhomosexuality had been actively engaged in by 20 per cent, masturbation by 62 per cent,â€ it may be referring not to you, and people like you, but to a couple of other females somewhere.&lt;/i&gt;

Wishful thinking, perhaps, by someone who would like to think of women as only being sexual when it's considered convenient and appropriate by their male partner? Because those numbers seem pretty non-controversial given the perfectly huge numbers of babies born six and seven months after their parents' weddings in the 50s.

The mentality that "sex is for men" is strong even today: many young men who have gigabytes of lesbian porn on their computers are disgusted - disgusted, I tell you! - by both a) real lesbians and b) straight women who enjoy gay porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So, when this Kinsey report says, â€œ40 per cent of our sample were nonvirgins before marriage,â€ â€œadultery had been committed by 25 per cent or more of the married women by the age of forty,â€ â€œhomosexuality had been actively engaged in by 20 per cent, masturbation by 62 per cent,â€ it may be referring not to you, and people like you, but to a couple of other females somewhere.</i></p>
<p>Wishful thinking, perhaps, by someone who would like to think of women as only being sexual when it&#8217;s considered convenient and appropriate by their male partner? Because those numbers seem pretty non-controversial given the perfectly huge numbers of babies born six and seven months after their parents&#8217; weddings in the 50s.</p>
<p>The mentality that &#8220;sex is for men&#8221; is strong even today: many young men who have gigabytes of lesbian porn on their computers are disgusted - disgusted, I tell you! - by both a) real lesbians and b) straight women who enjoy gay porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
