<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kinsey&#8217;s Study of Female Sex Behavior  (Sep, 1953)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/</link>
	<description>Yesterday&#039;s tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:35:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: godofbugs</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-1083996</link>
		<dc:creator>godofbugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 20:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/#comment-1083996</guid>
		<description>About &quot;What Kinsey’s Report Overlooks&quot; - I see no scientific relevance in:1) taking in consideration a subjective observation (not objective) of a woman watching (baby and man next to her); 2) putting love and sex together and affiliate with women behavior (that can exclude man behavior). I am actively involved in homosexual relations and I must thank Kinsey&#039;s researches on sexual behavior for taking out homosexuality from list of diseases. WE still have many things to discover. The interest for that is just the first step. And when we are doing it, we must be close to perfection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About &#8220;What Kinsey’s Report Overlooks&#8221; &#8211; I see no scientific relevance in:1) taking in consideration a subjective observation (not objective) of a woman watching (baby and man next to her); 2) putting love and sex together and affiliate with women behavior (that can exclude man behavior). I am actively involved in homosexual relations and I must thank Kinsey&#8217;s researches on sexual behavior for taking out homosexuality from list of diseases. WE still have many things to discover. The interest for that is just the first step. And when we are doing it, we must be close to perfection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-1067830</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/#comment-1067830</guid>
		<description>Re: babies born less than 9 months after the ceremony: &quot;everyone knows that a young bride can accomplish in 7 months what an older wife needs 9  months for&quot;. From an old Heinlein story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: babies born less than 9 months after the ceremony: &#8220;everyone knows that a young bride can accomplish in 7 months what an older wife needs 9  months for&#8221;. From an old Heinlein story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stannous</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-221483</link>
		<dc:creator>Stannous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/#comment-221483</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty surprised to see this depth of coverage in that old a Cosmo.

I remember reading a study of the dates of births as they relate to marriages and in the conservative Massachusetts Bay Colony and in the early 1700&#039;s about 30% of babies were born less than 9 months after the ceremony.

Nothing new under the covers (except maybe the lies about it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty surprised to see this depth of coverage in that old a Cosmo.</p>
<p>I remember reading a study of the dates of births as they relate to marriages and in the conservative Massachusetts Bay Colony and in the early 1700&#8242;s about 30% of babies were born less than 9 months after the ceremony.</p>
<p>Nothing new under the covers (except maybe the lies about it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caya</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-220069</link>
		<dc:creator>Caya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 15:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/#comment-220069</guid>
		<description>This blog is becoming rather trashy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog is becoming rather trashy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blurgle</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/comment-page-1/#comment-219817</link>
		<dc:creator>Blurgle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 12:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/03/kinseys-study-of-female-sex-behavior/#comment-219817</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So, when this Kinsey report says, â€œ40 per cent of our sample were nonvirgins before marriage,â€ â€œadultery had been committed by 25 per cent or more of the married women by the age of forty,â€ â€œhomosexuality had been actively engaged in by 20 per cent, masturbation by 62 per cent,â€ it may be referring not to you, and people like you, but to a couple of other females somewhere.&lt;/i&gt;

Wishful thinking, perhaps, by someone who would like to think of women as only being sexual when it&#039;s considered convenient and appropriate by their male partner? Because those numbers seem pretty non-controversial given the perfectly huge numbers of babies born six and seven months after their parents&#039; weddings in the 50s.

The mentality that &quot;sex is for men&quot; is strong even today: many young men who have gigabytes of lesbian porn on their computers are disgusted - disgusted, I tell you! - by both a) real lesbians and b) straight women who enjoy gay porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So, when this Kinsey report says, â€œ40 per cent of our sample were nonvirgins before marriage,â€ â€œadultery had been committed by 25 per cent or more of the married women by the age of forty,â€ â€œhomosexuality had been actively engaged in by 20 per cent, masturbation by 62 per cent,â€ it may be referring not to you, and people like you, but to a couple of other females somewhere.</i></p>
<p>Wishful thinking, perhaps, by someone who would like to think of women as only being sexual when it&#8217;s considered convenient and appropriate by their male partner? Because those numbers seem pretty non-controversial given the perfectly huge numbers of babies born six and seven months after their parents&#8217; weddings in the 50s.</p>
<p>The mentality that &#8220;sex is for men&#8221; is strong even today: many young men who have gigabytes of lesbian porn on their computers are disgusted &#8211; disgusted, I tell you! &#8211; by both a) real lesbians and b) straight women who enjoy gay porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

