<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WHAT&#8217;S WRONG With Uncle Sam&#8217;s Navy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/17/whats-wrong-with-uncle-sams-navy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/17/whats-wrong-with-uncle-sams-navy/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil Russell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/17/whats-wrong-with-uncle-sams-navy/#comment-625153</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/17/whats-wrong-with-uncle-sams-navy/#comment-625153</guid>
		<description>"As a gesture of our peaceful intentions toward Japan and other nations of the Far East we gave up the fortification and equipment of naval bases west of Hawaii. Simultaneously we scrapped 842,000 tons of new naval construction at an expense of $275,439,275 to the American taxpayers. Included in this were eleven of the finest and most modern men-of-war; seven powerful battleships and four battle cruisers. These ships were building at the time and the average stage of completion was 30 per cent. No other nation made such sacrifices."

The more things change right?

There was at least some prophecy in the last sentence; before the Roosevelt administration was over the US Navy was truly second to none.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As a gesture of our peaceful intentions toward Japan and other nations of the Far East we gave up the fortification and equipment of naval bases west of Hawaii. Simultaneously we scrapped 842,000 tons of new naval construction at an expense of $275,439,275 to the American taxpayers. Included in this were eleven of the finest and most modern men-of-war; seven powerful battleships and four battle cruisers. These ships were building at the time and the average stage of completion was 30 per cent. No other nation made such sacrifices.&#8221;</p>
<p>The more things change right?</p>
<p>There was at least some prophecy in the last sentence; before the Roosevelt administration was over the US Navy was truly second to none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/17/whats-wrong-with-uncle-sams-navy/#comment-259762</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/17/whats-wrong-with-uncle-sams-navy/#comment-259762</guid>
		<description>Good question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blurgle</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/17/whats-wrong-with-uncle-sams-navy/#comment-259507</link>
		<dc:creator>Blurgle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/17/whats-wrong-with-uncle-sams-navy/#comment-259507</guid>
		<description>What does Hannibal on page 2 there have to do with any of this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does Hannibal on page 2 there have to do with any of this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
