<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Home Movies From Phonograph Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/19/home-movies-from-phonograph-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/19/home-movies-from-phonograph-records/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nextz77</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/19/home-movies-from-phonograph-records/#comment-1052238</link>
		<dc:creator>nextz77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/19/home-movies-from-phonograph-records/#comment-1052238</guid>
		<description>phonograph record,so there was video at that time ,this is unique !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phonograph record,so there was video at that time ,this is unique !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Lindemeyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/19/home-movies-from-phonograph-records/#comment-1048240</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lindemeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/19/home-movies-from-phonograph-records/#comment-1048240</guid>
		<description>Baird's system ("Phonovision") was actually based on television technology, not film. But I guess any recorded visual motion would qualify as a "movie."

What killed it was that the phonorecording process introduced way too much noise to allow the picture to be played back. 

It took 60+ years before an engineer in Scotland figured out how to do it, and it took all kinds of electronic cleaning up.

http://tvdawn.com tells the story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baird&#8217;s system (&#8221;Phonovision&#8221;) was actually based on television technology, not film. But I guess any recorded visual motion would qualify as a &#8220;movie.&#8221;</p>
<p>What killed it was that the phonorecording process introduced way too much noise to allow the picture to be played back. </p>
<p>It took 60+ years before an engineer in Scotland figured out how to do it, and it took all kinds of electronic cleaning up.</p>
<p><a href="http://tvdawn.com" rel="nofollow">http://tvdawn.com</a> tells the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirby L. Wallace</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/19/home-movies-from-phonograph-records/#comment-985976</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirby L. Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/06/19/home-movies-from-phonograph-records/#comment-985976</guid>
		<description>It's funny how just about anyone who is from Germany seems to be portrayed with one of those short "hitler moustaches."  THis story, and the one earrlier in the "ahead of their time" list (the one about the "large screen viewer for public speakers, Nov '37) both show people from Germany with a hitler 'stache.

Must have been the popular style back then, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how just about anyone who is from Germany seems to be portrayed with one of those short &#8220;hitler moustaches.&#8221;  THis story, and the one earrlier in the &#8220;ahead of their time&#8221; list (the one about the &#8220;large screen viewer for public speakers, Nov &#8216;37) both show people from Germany with a hitler &#8217;stache.</p>
<p>Must have been the popular style back then, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
