<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fate of UNIVERSE May Be Told in Cosmic Ray Origin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/08/fate-of-universe-may-be-told-in-cosmic-ray-origin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/08/fate-of-universe-may-be-told-in-cosmic-ray-origin/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/08/fate-of-universe-may-be-told-in-cosmic-ray-origin/#comment-311242</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/08/fate-of-universe-may-be-told-in-cosmic-ray-origin/#comment-311242</guid>
		<description>Can't mention cosmic rays and let this go by:

http://www.tvtunesonline.com/wavs/fantastic_four97.wav</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t mention cosmic rays and let this go by:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tvtunesonline.com/wavs/fantastic_four97.wav" rel="nofollow">http://www.tvtunesonline.com/w.....four97.wav</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/08/fate-of-universe-may-be-told-in-cosmic-ray-origin/#comment-311237</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/08/fate-of-universe-may-be-told-in-cosmic-ray-origin/#comment-311237</guid>
		<description>From the 1911  Encyclopedia:

www.1911encyclopedia.org/Sun

&lt;i&gt;If we examine chemical sources for maintenance of the sun's heat, combustion and other forms of combination are out of the question, because no combinations of different elements are known to exist at a temperature of 6000Â°. A source which seems plausible, perhaps only because it is less easy to test, is rearrangement of the structure of the elements' atoms. An atom is no longer figured as indivisible, it is made up of more or less complex, and more or less permanent, systems in internal circulation.&lt;/i&gt;

So atomic energy was understood to be the source of stellar energy by the 1930s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the 1911  Encyclopedia:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Sun" rel="nofollow">http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Sun</a></p>
<p><i>If we examine chemical sources for maintenance of the sun&#8217;s heat, combustion and other forms of combination are out of the question, because no combinations of different elements are known to exist at a temperature of 6000Â°. A source which seems plausible, perhaps only because it is less easy to test, is rearrangement of the structure of the elements&#8217; atoms. An atom is no longer figured as indivisible, it is made up of more or less complex, and more or less permanent, systems in internal circulation.</i></p>
<p>So atomic energy was understood to be the source of stellar energy by the 1930s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
