<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV Tubes Get Bigger&#8230;And Tuners Cross the Room</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/30/tv-tubes-get-biggerand-tuners-cross-the-room/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/30/tv-tubes-get-biggerand-tuners-cross-the-room/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:04:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/30/tv-tubes-get-biggerand-tuners-cross-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-1059800</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/30/tv-tubes-get-biggerand-tuners-cross-the-room/#comment-1059800</guid>
		<description>Hey, I just linked to your blog through my website. I&#039;ve been curious as to how this &quot;trackback&quot; thing works. If there&#039;s anything better about a &quot;trackback&quot; vs. a link, and you&#039;d prefer that, let me know. I probably can&#039;t post the link to my site here, but if you follow my page, about, and then click the &quot;informal&quot; link up at the top, you&#039;ll find something about TV tubes half-way-down the page with your link. No biggie, just a curiosity about the trackback thing, and thanks for posting those retro tv pics! -- Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I just linked to your blog through my website. I&#8217;ve been curious as to how this &#8220;trackback&#8221; thing works. If there&#8217;s anything better about a &#8220;trackback&#8221; vs. a link, and you&#8217;d prefer that, let me know. I probably can&#8217;t post the link to my site here, but if you follow my page, about, and then click the &#8220;informal&#8221; link up at the top, you&#8217;ll find something about TV tubes half-way-down the page with your link. No biggie, just a curiosity about the trackback thing, and thanks for posting those retro tv pics! &#8212; Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasper</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/30/tv-tubes-get-biggerand-tuners-cross-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-383948</link>
		<dc:creator>jasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 00:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/30/tv-tubes-get-biggerand-tuners-cross-the-room/#comment-383948</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s Dr. Allan B. DuMont, inventor, engineer and President of the DuMont Network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s Dr. Allan B. DuMont, inventor, engineer and President of the DuMont Network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: avatar28</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/30/tv-tubes-get-biggerand-tuners-cross-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-378981</link>
		<dc:creator>avatar28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 03:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/30/tv-tubes-get-biggerand-tuners-cross-the-room/#comment-378981</guid>
		<description>Yeah, tubes really max out at about 40-45 inches or so. It IS possible to make them larger, but not especially practical. The larger sizes require ever higher voltages to the electron guns which in turn increase x-ray production when the electrons strike the screen and thus thicker and heavier glass. By the time you&#039;re getting into the 40 inch you&#039;re looking at 200+ lbs pretty easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, tubes really max out at about 40-45 inches or so. It IS possible to make them larger, but not especially practical. The larger sizes require ever higher voltages to the electron guns which in turn increase x-ray production when the electrons strike the screen and thus thicker and heavier glass. By the time you&#8217;re getting into the 40 inch you&#8217;re looking at 200+ lbs pretty easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/30/tv-tubes-get-biggerand-tuners-cross-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-365678</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/07/30/tv-tubes-get-biggerand-tuners-cross-the-room/#comment-365678</guid>
		<description>30 inch direct view isn&#039;t too bad even by todays standards.

The TV must have weighed 500 lbs!

Is that guy the president?

On New Years Day TMC (The Movie Channel) played classic SF films back to back to back, including &quot;Red Planet Mars&quot; (1952).

The scientist had a big tube in the lab... but he had a huge hi-def widescreen flatscreen in his house! WITH remote!
(As the movie was in glorious black and white, I couldn&#039;t tell if it was color.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30 inch direct view isn&#8217;t too bad even by todays standards.</p>
<p>The TV must have weighed 500 lbs!</p>
<p>Is that guy the president?</p>
<p>On New Years Day TMC (The Movie Channel) played classic SF films back to back to back, including &#8220;Red Planet Mars&#8221; (1952).</p>
<p>The scientist had a big tube in the lab&#8230; but he had a huge hi-def widescreen flatscreen in his house! WITH remote!<br />
(As the movie was in glorious black and white, I couldn&#8217;t tell if it was color.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
