<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Giant Tanks&#8230;PEACEMAKERS OR WAR BRUTES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/08/17/new-giant-tankspeacemakers-or-war-brutes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/08/17/new-giant-tankspeacemakers-or-war-brutes/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:28:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KHarn</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/08/17/new-giant-tankspeacemakers-or-war-brutes/comment-page-1/#comment-1048324</link>
		<dc:creator>KHarn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/08/17/new-giant-tankspeacemakers-or-war-brutes/#comment-1048324</guid>
		<description>Note the tank at the begining of the artical; the US had FIVE of these, the Army had three, named &quot;Cyclone&quot;, &quot;Hurricane&quot; and &quot;Tornado&quot; with the m1916 37mm trench gun. The Marines had the other two, armed with .50 caliber machineguns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note the tank at the begining of the artical; the US had FIVE of these, the Army had three, named &#8220;Cyclone&#8221;, &#8220;Hurricane&#8221; and &#8220;Tornado&#8221; with the m1916 37mm trench gun. The Marines had the other two, armed with .50 caliber machineguns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marine Tanker</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/08/17/new-giant-tankspeacemakers-or-war-brutes/comment-page-1/#comment-443134</link>
		<dc:creator>Marine Tanker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 19:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/08/17/new-giant-tankspeacemakers-or-war-brutes/#comment-443134</guid>
		<description>Actually, *nobody* adopted a Christie designed tank. The only tank that Christie ever sold was the BT-1 to the Soviet Union and it never entered production. Even the trademark suspension was changed in the BT-2 redesign and it was changed even further in future designs and adoptions. Luckily for him, everybody still called it &quot;Christie Suspension&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, *nobody* adopted a Christie designed tank. The only tank that Christie ever sold was the BT-1 to the Soviet Union and it never entered production. Even the trademark suspension was changed in the BT-2 redesign and it was changed even further in future designs and adoptions. Luckily for him, everybody still called it &#8220;Christie Suspension&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emcha</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/08/17/new-giant-tankspeacemakers-or-war-brutes/comment-page-1/#comment-442502</link>
		<dc:creator>Emcha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 14:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/08/17/new-giant-tankspeacemakers-or-war-brutes/#comment-442502</guid>
		<description>Funny that U.S.Army abandoned Christie tank, while many other countries adopted it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that U.S.Army abandoned Christie tank, while many other countries adopted it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
