<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE STORY of RADAR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/10/06/the-story-of-radar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/10/06/the-story-of-radar/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Radarjunkie</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/10/06/the-story-of-radar/#comment-1045849</link>
		<dc:creator>Radarjunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/10/06/the-story-of-radar/#comment-1045849</guid>
		<description>Why do you take the illustrations so seriously?  To draw out the actual view of the screen wouldn't sell the story and especially back then when it was "new".  

Just because both had the technology, doesn't mean we would say "Hey, here is what we have!" 

This is really good story and one that I enjoy because I work on maintaining radar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you take the illustrations so seriously?  To draw out the actual view of the screen wouldn&#8217;t sell the story and especially back then when it was &#8220;new&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Just because both had the technology, doesn&#8217;t mean we would say &#8220;Hey, here is what we have!&#8221; </p>
<p>This is really good story and one that I enjoy because I work on maintaining radar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/10/06/the-story-of-radar/#comment-586980</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/10/06/the-story-of-radar/#comment-586980</guid>
		<description>From my understanding the "self destruct" on the Norden bombsight was a pistol or aball peen hammer

http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi1004.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my understanding the &#8220;self destruct&#8221; on the Norden bombsight was a pistol or aball peen hammer</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi1004.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi1004.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/10/06/the-story-of-radar/#comment-580632</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 20:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/10/06/the-story-of-radar/#comment-580632</guid>
		<description>Did Allied aircraft have a  "self-destruct" for  the Norden bombsight and the Radar apparatus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Allied aircraft have a  &#8220;self-destruct&#8221; for  the Norden bombsight and the Radar apparatus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMyint</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/10/06/the-story-of-radar/#comment-580018</link>
		<dc:creator>JMyint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 14:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/10/06/the-story-of-radar/#comment-580018</guid>
		<description>Allied radar was way in advance of anything the Germans fielded. The early 1 metre systems employed in the Chain Home stations did not used parabolic antennas nor did they rotate or oscilllate.  They sent a pulse in one direction and listened for a return.  The germans really didn't advance much past this.  

The invention of the magnetron tube (the second most manufactured tube today)  eneable the allies to build small, reliable radar sets with the kind of directional capability we know today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allied radar was way in advance of anything the Germans fielded. The early 1 metre systems employed in the Chain Home stations did not used parabolic antennas nor did they rotate or oscilllate.  They sent a pulse in one direction and listened for a return.  The germans really didn&#8217;t advance much past this.  </p>
<p>The invention of the magnetron tube (the second most manufactured tube today)  eneable the allies to build small, reliable radar sets with the kind of directional capability we know today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/10/06/the-story-of-radar/#comment-577902</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/10/06/the-story-of-radar/#comment-577902</guid>
		<description>Electrons?
Don't think so.
Extreamely short wavelength radiowaves in brief but powerful pulses maybe.

If the enemy and the allies  both have radar,  why was it a secret?

By the way....

In a WWII movie made during the war, the Germans had  Magical Televisions  in their fighters that allowed them to  hunt Allied aircraft.
The pilot had to adjust the focus manually,  but the image looked  of  photographic quality!

In retrospect, it seems odd to attribute advanced technology to the enemy in a motion picture.

Dang! Probably in the public  domain now, but   I don't know how  to find its title.


Buy the way...
From the article illustrations...

Widescreen radar displays in the control tower!
But....  not  showing blips!

Nice screen in the airplane, but the image  isn't  significantly different from looking through the windscreen!

Parabolic rotating  or oscillating antennas notable  for their absence!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electrons?<br />
Don&#8217;t think so.<br />
Extreamely short wavelength radiowaves in brief but powerful pulses maybe.</p>
<p>If the enemy and the allies  both have radar,  why was it a secret?</p>
<p>By the way&#8230;.</p>
<p>In a WWII movie made during the war, the Germans had  Magical Televisions  in their fighters that allowed them to  hunt Allied aircraft.<br />
The pilot had to adjust the focus manually,  but the image looked  of  photographic quality!</p>
<p>In retrospect, it seems odd to attribute advanced technology to the enemy in a motion picture.</p>
<p>Dang! Probably in the public  domain now, but   I don&#8217;t know how  to find its title.</p>
<p>Buy the way&#8230;<br />
From the article illustrations&#8230;</p>
<p>Widescreen radar displays in the control tower!<br />
But&#8230;.  not  showing blips!</p>
<p>Nice screen in the airplane, but the image  isn&#8217;t  significantly different from looking through the windscreen!</p>
<p>Parabolic rotating  or oscillating antennas notable  for their absence!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
