<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LETTERS COPIED AT HIGH SPEED</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/10/letters-copied-at-high-speed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/10/letters-copied-at-high-speed/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Brisendine</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/10/letters-copied-at-high-speed/#comment-717733</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Brisendine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 01:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/10/letters-copied-at-high-speed/#comment-717733</guid>
		<description>It does indeed look like a photostat process. Though xerography (xerox) replaced stats for office documents stats were still used by graphic artist until scanners came into popular use. Photostats were much sharper. Plus you could cut and paste stats and have better control of exposure and size, depending on the camera used. In my younger days I made tens of thousands of those things. You would expose the negative paper and marry it to a positive reciever through a nasty activator chemical and a simple machine with rollers. After final approval the sheets were often shot on a process camera to make a litho negative that would then be used to make plates for printing presses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does indeed look like a photostat process. Though xerography (xerox) replaced stats for office documents stats were still used by graphic artist until scanners came into popular use. Photostats were much sharper. Plus you could cut and paste stats and have better control of exposure and size, depending on the camera used. In my younger days I made tens of thousands of those things. You would expose the negative paper and marry it to a positive reciever through a nasty activator chemical and a simple machine with rollers. After final approval the sheets were often shot on a process camera to make a litho negative that would then be used to make plates for printing presses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blurgle</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/10/letters-copied-at-high-speed/#comment-714825</link>
		<dc:creator>Blurgle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 16:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/10/letters-copied-at-high-speed/#comment-714825</guid>
		<description>Was this a photostat machine? Because the time, mess, and expense of creating photostat copies is what drove Chester Carlson to invent xerography in 1938.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was this a photostat machine? Because the time, mess, and expense of creating photostat copies is what drove Chester Carlson to invent xerography in 1938.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stannous</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/10/letters-copied-at-high-speed/#comment-714731</link>
		<dc:creator>Stannous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/10/letters-copied-at-high-speed/#comment-714731</guid>
		<description>But there's no room to put your hideous naked butt!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But there&#8217;s no room to put your hideous naked butt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
