<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MACHINES THAT WILL FIGHT THE Next War  (Oct, 1934)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/19/machines-that-will-fight-the-next-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/19/machines-that-will-fight-the-next-war/</link>
	<description>Yesterday&#039;s tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:39:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/19/machines-that-will-fight-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-768851</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/19/machines-that-will-fight-the-next-war/#comment-768851</guid>
		<description>I believe you are talking about Winged Defense by General Billy Mitchell published in 1925 and still in print by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe you are talking about Winged Defense by General Billy Mitchell published in 1925 and still in print by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/19/machines-that-will-fight-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-768556</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/19/machines-that-will-fight-the-next-war/#comment-768556</guid>
		<description>Predicted Blitkreig: +1
Predicted sea-launched bombing raids: +1
Predicted demoralised civilians after air attack: -1
(Neither Londoners nor Berliners were demoralized sufficiently by air attacks. If anything, it made them angry at the enemy.)

No mention of V1 or V2 type weapons or Atomic weapons.
(Not even a mention of Dirty Bombs.)

Who wrote that book about the Japanese attacking Pearl Harbor well before they actually did?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Predicted Blitkreig: +1<br />
Predicted sea-launched bombing raids: +1<br />
Predicted demoralised civilians after air attack: -1<br />
(Neither Londoners nor Berliners were demoralized sufficiently by air attacks. If anything, it made them angry at the enemy.)</p>
<p>No mention of V1 or V2 type weapons or Atomic weapons.<br />
(Not even a mention of Dirty Bombs.)</p>
<p>Who wrote that book about the Japanese attacking Pearl Harbor well before they actually did?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gasbow</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/19/machines-that-will-fight-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-768021</link>
		<dc:creator>Gasbow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/11/19/machines-that-will-fight-the-next-war/#comment-768021</guid>
		<description>except for the gas warfare and perhabs the underestimation of tanks, this one got it pretty right.

and it is one of the few articles that forsaw the importance of air warfare</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>except for the gas warfare and perhabs the underestimation of tanks, this one got it pretty right.</p>
<p>and it is one of the few articles that forsaw the importance of air warfare</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

