<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is the Supersonic Barrier  (Feb, 1947)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/</link>
	<description>Yesterday&#039;s tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-899924</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/#comment-899924</guid>
		<description>Turns out that the airfoil NACA 65-110 on the Bell X-1 flown by Yeager did the trick.

NACA 0012:
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4219/Chapter3.html

NACA 65-110
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/pao/History/SP-445/ch2-4.htm#fig5

The NACA 0012 cross section didn&#039;t go to waste though...seems that the decidedly subsonic C-5 Galaxy uses the NACA 0012.41 mod profile at the wing root.

I still love that drawing.  The breathless articles about future aircraft are like a virgin talking about sex; they do it with enthusiasm and ignorance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turns out that the airfoil NACA 65-110 on the Bell X-1 flown by Yeager did the trick.</p>
<p>NACA 0012:<br />
<a href="http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4219/Chapter3.html" rel="nofollow">http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4219/Chapter3.html</a></p>
<p>NACA 65-110<br />
<a href="http://www.hq.nasa.gov/pao/History/SP-445/ch2-4.htm#fig5" rel="nofollow">http://www.hq.nasa.gov/pao/His.....4.htm#fig5</a></p>
<p>The NACA 0012 cross section didn&#8217;t go to waste though&#8230;seems that the decidedly subsonic C-5 Galaxy uses the NACA 0012.41 mod profile at the wing root.</p>
<p>I still love that drawing.  The breathless articles about future aircraft are like a virgin talking about sex; they do it with enthusiasm and ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-895238</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/#comment-895238</guid>
		<description>Google for   Thunberdirds    (cut and paste)   High-larious!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google for   Thunberdirds    (cut and paste)   High-larious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmyint</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-894899</link>
		<dc:creator>jmyint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/#comment-894899</guid>
		<description>There was also the Russian TU-144 that flew comercially from 1975 to 1978.  As of 1999 the was still at least two in use as flying labratories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was also the Russian TU-144 that flew comercially from 1975 to 1978.  As of 1999 the was still at least two in use as flying labratories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-894428</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/#comment-894428</guid>
		<description>Look at that picture again....
Thunderbirds are GO!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at that picture again&#8230;.<br />
Thunderbirds are GO!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-890367</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/#comment-890367</guid>
		<description>Concorde was, no longer in service</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concorde was, no longer in service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myles</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/comment-page-1/#comment-890177</link>
		<dc:creator>Myles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/09/this-is-the-supersonic-barrier/#comment-890177</guid>
		<description>Are any supersonic airliners close to being put into production?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are any supersonic airliners close to being put into production?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

