<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TOBACCO SMOKE NOT HARMFUL ACCORDING TO MINE TEST</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:00:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: -DOUG-</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1068463</link>
		<dc:creator>-DOUG-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/#comment-1068463</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t know, it&#039;s been 85 years since this test, and I&#039;ve yet to see anyone repeat it with different results. I think these OTHER studies are conducted with money from the antismoking lobby, you KNOW that will be biased.

As for them thinking that a single blood test would mean anything, remember this is 1924, can&#039;t expect they were thinking too hard about long term effects and repeated exposure yet. If you told them going in the sun on a regular basis was going to cause skin cancer, would even the doctors have taken you seriously?

People were probably anxious to believe this. Just like they were anxious to believe it was okay to invade Iraq. To believe that you could grow corn and sugar to turn into all the fuel we&#039;d need. To believe that fuel should get the same mileage that gasoline gets. To believe that Barack Obama would try to balance the budget.

No point in scoffing at what people were ready to believe back then. Future generations will laugh at plenty from us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t know, it&#8217;s been 85 years since this test, and I&#8217;ve yet to see anyone repeat it with different results. I think these OTHER studies are conducted with money from the antismoking lobby, you KNOW that will be biased.</p>
<p>As for them thinking that a single blood test would mean anything, remember this is 1924, can&#8217;t expect they were thinking too hard about long term effects and repeated exposure yet. If you told them going in the sun on a regular basis was going to cause skin cancer, would even the doctors have taken you seriously?</p>
<p>People were probably anxious to believe this. Just like they were anxious to believe it was okay to invade Iraq. To believe that you could grow corn and sugar to turn into all the fuel we&#8217;d need. To believe that fuel should get the same mileage that gasoline gets. To believe that Barack Obama would try to balance the budget.</p>
<p>No point in scoffing at what people were ready to believe back then. Future generations will laugh at plenty from us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notobaccocampaign</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1068419</link>
		<dc:creator>notobaccocampaign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/#comment-1068419</guid>
		<description>i disagree with this. this is not true. smoking is harmful and there are many studies to prove this.
Smoking tobacco is dangerous to your health. People should be informed by the issues about smoking. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i disagree with this. this is not true. smoking is harmful and there are many studies to prove this.<br />
Smoking tobacco is dangerous to your health. People should be informed by the issues about smoking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .......</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/comment-page-1/#comment-1067603</link>
		<dc:creator>.......</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/#comment-1067603</guid>
		<description>HAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Auricchio</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/comment-page-1/#comment-916342</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Auricchio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 02:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/#comment-916342</guid>
		<description>I like the concept of smoking in mines, where methane is present. The resulting mine explosion proves smoking can kill you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the concept of smoking in mines, where methane is present. The resulting mine explosion proves smoking can kill you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MC</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/comment-page-1/#comment-914885</link>
		<dc:creator>MC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/#comment-914885</guid>
		<description>Why would anyone imagine that a single blood test would tell whether something is harmful?  

Also, in the &quot;Duh!&quot; category, if these people had to wear goggles, doesn&#039;t that *prove* the fumes were harmful?

I smell tobacco-industry money here.  Even in the 1920s, German scientists were starting to raise questions about the health implications of smoking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would anyone imagine that a single blood test would tell whether something is harmful?  </p>
<p>Also, in the &#8220;Duh!&#8221; category, if these people had to wear goggles, doesn&#8217;t that *prove* the fumes were harmful?</p>
<p>I smell tobacco-industry money here.  Even in the 1920s, German scientists were starting to raise questions about the health implications of smoking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Brisendine</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/comment-page-1/#comment-914339</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Brisendine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/#comment-914339</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure everyone is greatful that Phillip-Morris was willing to spend their hard earned money to sponser this important test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure everyone is greatful that Phillip-Morris was willing to spend their hard earned money to sponser this important test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris L</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/comment-page-1/#comment-913454</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 09:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2007/12/15/tobacco-smoke-not-harmful-according-to-mine-test/#comment-913454</guid>
		<description>Well, that settles it, then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that settles it, then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
