<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Make Street Intersections PAY a PROFIT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:00:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard C</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-983460</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/#comment-983460</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not the intersection that &quot;pays a profit&quot;, it&#039;s the commercial building that does so.  If you put the commercial building in the middle of the block, it&#039;d pay the same profit, and it would be simpler to construct there, too.  Put it on that empty corner lot just to the left of its present position, and it&#039;s even easier and cheaper to build there, so its profit will be even higher.

He&#039;s combined two ideas: that of using overpass/underpasses to separate traffic, and that of constructing office buildings on top of the real estate used by streets.  The former is reasonable under some circumstances, the latter rarely so.  

Imagine when a gasoline tanker crashes and catches fire under the building, like happened in Oakland&#039;s MacArthur Maze awhile back, causing the overpass to fall down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not the intersection that &#8220;pays a profit&#8221;, it&#8217;s the commercial building that does so.  If you put the commercial building in the middle of the block, it&#8217;d pay the same profit, and it would be simpler to construct there, too.  Put it on that empty corner lot just to the left of its present position, and it&#8217;s even easier and cheaper to build there, so its profit will be even higher.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s combined two ideas: that of using overpass/underpasses to separate traffic, and that of constructing office buildings on top of the real estate used by streets.  The former is reasonable under some circumstances, the latter rarely so.  </p>
<p>Imagine when a gasoline tanker crashes and catches fire under the building, like happened in Oakland&#8217;s MacArthur Maze awhile back, causing the overpass to fall down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glindsey</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-983208</link>
		<dc:creator>glindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/#comment-983208</guid>
		<description>Actually, I think the idea was that the pedestrians would be at ground level, with the east-west traffic below them and the north-south traffic above them.  Interesting concept, except for the problems noted above -- no left turns would make for some crazy navigation in the city, and large trucks would definitely be an issue (though I&#039;ll bet the designer assumed all cargo would be transported through an extensive rail system).  And can you imagine one of these at every single city street intersection?  You&#039;d constantly be going up and down ramps, trying to get around!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think the idea was that the pedestrians would be at ground level, with the east-west traffic below them and the north-south traffic above them.  Interesting concept, except for the problems noted above &#8212; no left turns would make for some crazy navigation in the city, and large trucks would definitely be an issue (though I&#8217;ll bet the designer assumed all cargo would be transported through an extensive rail system).  And can you imagine one of these at every single city street intersection?  You&#8217;d constantly be going up and down ramps, trying to get around!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stannous</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-982011</link>
		<dc:creator>Stannous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 05:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/#comment-982011</guid>
		<description>And I didn&#039;t think about it until later but if one street goes under there is no reason for the other to go up.

I can&#039;t believe they granted a patent on this silliness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I didn&#8217;t think about it until later but if one street goes under there is no reason for the other to go up.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe they granted a patent on this silliness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Auricchio</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-981614</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Auricchio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/#comment-981614</guid>
		<description>The beacons are a nice touch.

They assume the air is polluted enough so that an aviator can see the beam pointing toward the airport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The beacons are a nice touch.</p>
<p>They assume the air is polluted enough so that an aviator can see the beam pointing toward the airport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Auricchio</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-981609</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Auricchio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/#comment-981609</guid>
		<description>Or a large truck tries to get through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or a large truck tries to get through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stannous</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/comment-page-1/#comment-980190</link>
		<dc:creator>Stannous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/01/make-street-intersections-pay-a-profit/#comment-980190</guid>
		<description>Works great unless some troublemaker wants to make a left turn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works great unless some troublemaker wants to make a left turn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
