At least I got you to go off the canned message you inflict on everyone else

SODOMY WITH PERSON UNDER 14 YEARS OR WITH FORCE
ORAL COPULATION WITH PERSON UNDER 14/ETC OR BY FORCE/ETC

By the way, I found another website where Keith made his original post. Seems that coming up with a rant strains his creativity so he just starts repeating the same post over and over http://www.daytondailynews.com.....71844.html Apparently this is the only blog not letting him go unchallenged.

I see that you have a new picture up on your page on the Megan’s Law California website that I referenced earlier. Why so serious, is the microchip that the government implanted in your head causing discomfort? I keep telling you that an aluminum foil hat will block the signals.

Wow, a piece of trash Sex Offender referring to Sex Offender laws as “trash”? The only theory I have about the long absences between your posts is when you stop taking your anti-psychotic prescriptions or your electro shock treatments wear off.

“Tom foolery”? Dude, you got more problems then being a pervert!

Oh yeah, that slipping a letter on your name? Wow! You’re just to slick for me! You’re a real James Bond! Oh, what am I saying? He preferred women not kids!

PS
It’s Charlie’s blog not mine. In fact I don’t really exist, I’m just a figment of your imagination.

PPS Was that reference to “~its just started~” supposed to intimidate me? News flash Ace, I’m not some underage school girl, so it takes more than you to make me pause and catch my breath.

Forced sex with minors is just wrong.

http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/cg.....ng=ENGLISH

Now me, I wish I had a smile like that.

Well, Keith…anything else you want to share with the class?

But I’m curious what “Misconceptions” that our laws are based on. I remember when a sweeper truck driver around here witnessed a gang rape in hte middle of the night and drove on and never said anything. When the police eventually questined if he’d saen anything, he told them everything, and said he went off and ignored it “In case she wound up having a good time.” Laughing as he said it. Let’s just say I heard him say it. Has he identified one of the misconceptions here?

I mean, if it’s just a myth that it’s wrong to drug a 13 year old unconcious and rape her, you’d better let the L.A. courts know; or this Roman Polanski thing will just keep dragging on.

But I get the idea that the box of cereal is wrong, you’re not just a nut with something to babble. You’re on that registry, aren’t you. I didn’t read much of your nonsense the first time, but I did this time; that’s one advanced psychosis you have going there, trying to justify yourself. Or do you just know you’ve done things that COULD land you on that registry?

Meanwhile, let’s make the commercial for the cereal:

. FIREBRAND38
. (Speaking before crowd)
Fiber bran is also good with milk poured on.
. (All near him dowse him with milk)
Not ME, the CEREAL.

The Supreme Court just ruled on sex offender laws where some factions of our government think by some inert reasoning that sex offender should be quarantined like some virus steaming from draconian/Islamic law sex offenders should be executed. I have seen for myself, video taken in another country where a sex offender is placed on a pole much like the Catholics use to use a pyramid shaped object and have them sit on it and spin, the pole travels through the body looking for the throat but if not found its ok cause the sharpened end of the pole will come out somewhere. The heritage of the act is in its self a throwback to troglodyte’s who are so obsessed with sex they can find that the way to deal with the issue is as revolutionary, as war, and two wrongs don’t make a right but has in fact called up deep rooted issues of people who have had to put up with this kind of “hierarchy” of historic hysteria far to long. A word taken from hysterectomy, hysteria is tied to castration used to make animals less threatening right? Good old Monty Hall. Well no wonder it’s wrong, right?

Anyway we are supposed to be the most advanced nation and we still have a death penalty when the rest of the world except for nations we are still warring with, {think!} While other nations went home our weapons dealers and torture lovers delighting in support for the death of people they don’t know or want to simply because they don’t know how to get money with out taking it from someone by force, is that supposed to includes mutilations? In my humble opinion that alone are terrorist activities as much as severed hands, ears, heads, or making a case with nothing more than an obsession justified by lies.

The truth about the sex offender registry will come out soon enough. When it does, People will see how the use of the registry was created, and by exactly who and why and the devastation it has created and the worthlessness of the use of it. It’s origin in the Crow laws that brought disgrace to our nation allowing thieves and murderous societal bigots who have trashed any shot at making good of a program in its design to make money destroying our nation and its people. We can not play god and we can not survive using this behavior model because we are compounding the problem.

It’s a ruse designed by people who are getting rich off the castration/hysterectomy/health care/physic care of people through sex laws that have gone wild. What about the people who are being used by the Medicare programs that requires these mutilations for both men and woman after they take their means of support? Can’t you see? You have created the model and it is worthless! Why don’t you just indiscriminately kill people you don’t know that’s statically the next sex offender because over 90% of all new offences are people not on the sex offender registry and the numbers are increasing not decreasing so as a behavior model the chumps put together is really screwed up and they were told before they tried it. So what is the use of such laws as the sex offender registry other than to terrorize people? With the murder of so many sex offenders and the continued disregard for life by the use of the registry it’s just a mater of time before the federal government will be held liable for the deaths through federal court.

In a nation where a statement may have a double or triple meaning and our entire linage can be traced through mud, guts, and beer it’s nice once in a while to get the picture of what is meant instead of what some thinks someone may have implied. So it is from the trenches to the hill. Remember the game where someone says something in someone’s ear then passes it the same way to the next; the person advocating such destructive laws are the ones who need to be section 8 by simple brake down of the issue not sex offenders. Best regards

I wonder if paying for sex with stocks or bonds would be legal?