<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: a radically new SEX LAW</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:00:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/comment-page-1/#comment-1072267</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/#comment-1072267</guid>
		<description>On some other sites you complain about the microchip that was implanted in you. Right.  Rather than a microchip under your skin you have your head up your ass (that means you can&#039;t wear a tinfoil hat).  Based on your rambling posts and inability to spell did it ever occur to you that Videocartoonz.com failed not because you had sex with a minor but rather because you&#039;re incompetent?  How&#039;s that for grown up?  Jerk.

PS
It&#039;s Charlie&#039;s blog not mine.  In fact I don&#039;t really exist, I&#039;m just a figment of your imagination.

PPS Was that reference to &quot;~its just started~&quot; supposed to intimidate me?  News flash Ace, I&#039;m not some underage school girl, so it takes more than you to make me pause and catch my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On some other sites you complain about the microchip that was implanted in you. Right.  Rather than a microchip under your skin you have your head up your ass (that means you can&#8217;t wear a tinfoil hat).  Based on your rambling posts and inability to spell did it ever occur to you that <a href="http://Videocartoonz.com" title="http://Videocartoonz.com" class="autohyperlink" target="_blank">Videocartoonz.com</a> failed not because you had sex with a minor but rather because you&#8217;re incompetent?  How&#8217;s that for grown up?  Jerk.</p>
<p>PS<br />
It&#8217;s Charlie&#8217;s blog not mine.  In fact I don&#8217;t really exist, I&#8217;m just a figment of your imagination.</p>
<p>PPS Was that reference to &#8220;~its just started~&#8221; supposed to intimidate me?  News flash Ace, I&#8217;m not some underage school girl, so it takes more than you to make me pause and catch my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/comment-page-1/#comment-1072264</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/#comment-1072264</guid>
		<description>Keith Richard Radford Jr: Gee freak!  I&#039;d hate to be compared to a kid that you knew!  I&#039;ll bet there are a couple of kids that are trying to forget you as well.  News flash dude, you&#039;re a registered sex offender.  I get it, you don&#039;t like sex offender laws.  Unlike the other blogs you&#039;ve posted your nonsense on folks here know what you are.  Is that grown up enough for you, you sad bastard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith Richard Radford Jr: Gee freak!  I&#8217;d hate to be compared to a kid that you knew!  I&#8217;ll bet there are a couple of kids that are trying to forget you as well.  News flash dude, you&#8217;re a registered sex offender.  I get it, you don&#8217;t like sex offender laws.  Unlike the other blogs you&#8217;ve posted your nonsense on folks here know what you are.  Is that grown up enough for you, you sad bastard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Richard Radford Jr</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/comment-page-1/#comment-1072263</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Richard Radford Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/#comment-1072263</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t Know if you wait with great antispation for my next statment on you blog sir but your &quot;Keith, did you say something? I didn’t think so.&quot; is a cut and sounds like a kid I once knew and hoped to forget, never the less you will be seeing this step being stepped over by many more. The law is bad and must be changed because it is not for the good of anyone but people who write garbage like &quot;Keith, did you say something? I didn’t think so.&quot; Yes I have much to say! ~its just started~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t Know if you wait with great antispation for my next statment on you blog sir but your &#8220;Keith, did you say something? I didn’t think so.&#8221; is a cut and sounds like a kid I once knew and hoped to forget, never the less you will be seeing this step being stepped over by many more. The law is bad and must be changed because it is not for the good of anyone but people who write garbage like &#8220;Keith, did you say something? I didn’t think so.&#8221; Yes I have much to say! ~its just started~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/comment-page-1/#comment-1071722</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/#comment-1071722</guid>
		<description>Keith, did you say something?  I didn&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith, did you say something?  I didn&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMyint</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/comment-page-1/#comment-1071651</link>
		<dc:creator>JMyint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/#comment-1071651</guid>
		<description>Though it came in as law much later, also in Illinois it is not a felony for two minors between the ages of 13 and 17 to have consensual sex. The law was changed because far to many 15, 16, and 17 year old boys were going to prison for having sex with their girlfriends. Though personally I feel children should wait until they are 17 before having sex, realistically I know many kids just can&#039;t wait. 

Forced sex with minors is just wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though it came in as law much later, also in Illinois it is not a felony for two minors between the ages of 13 and 17 to have consensual sex. The law was changed because far to many 15, 16, and 17 year old boys were going to prison for having sex with their girlfriends. Though personally I feel children should wait until they are 17 before having sex, realistically I know many kids just can&#8217;t wait. </p>
<p>Forced sex with minors is just wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/comment-page-1/#comment-1071649</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/#comment-1071649</guid>
		<description>-DOUG-: The pity is I&#039;m lactose intolerant. Doug, you got it in one.  I have to wonder how such an asshole takes such a great picture?

http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/cgi/prosoma.dll?zoomAction=Box&amp;zoomAction=clickcenter&amp;zoomAction=clickoffender&amp;lastName=radford&amp;firstName=Keith&amp;Address=&amp;City=&amp;zipcode=&amp;searchDistance=.75&amp;City2=&amp;countyLocation=&amp;zipcode2=&amp;SelectCounty=&amp;ParkName=&amp;searchDistance2=.75&amp;City3=&amp;zipcode3=&amp;countyLocation3=&amp;schoolName=&amp;searchDistance3=.75&amp;City4=&amp;zipcode4=&amp;countyLocation4=&amp;refineID=&amp;pan=&amp;distacross=107211&amp;centerlat=38409907&amp;centerlon=-121514242&amp;starlat=&amp;starlon=&amp;startext=&amp;x1=&amp;y1=&amp;x2=&amp;y2=&amp;mapwidth=525&amp;mapheight=400&amp;zoom=&amp;searchBy=namelist&amp;id=&amp;docountycitylist=2&amp;OFDTYPE=&amp;lang=ENGLISH

Now me, I wish I had a smile like that.

Well, Keith...anything else you want to share with the class?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-DOUG-: The pity is I&#8217;m lactose intolerant. Doug, you got it in one.  I have to wonder how such an asshole takes such a great picture?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/cgi/prosoma.dll?zoomAction=Box&amp;zoomAction=clickcenter&amp;zoomAction=clickoffender&amp;lastName=radford&amp;firstName=Keith&amp;Address=&amp;City=&amp;zipcode=&amp;searchDistance=.75&amp;City2=&amp;countyLocation=&amp;zipcode2=&amp;SelectCounty=&amp;ParkName=&amp;searchDistance2=.75&amp;City3=&amp;zipcode3=&amp;countyLocation3=&amp;schoolName=&amp;searchDistance3=.75&amp;City4=&amp;zipcode4=&amp;countyLocation4=&amp;refineID=&amp;pan=&amp;distacross=107211&amp;centerlat=38409907&amp;centerlon=-121514242&amp;starlat=&amp;starlon=&amp;startext=&amp;x1=&amp;y1=&amp;x2=&amp;y2=&amp;mapwidth=525&amp;mapheight=400&amp;zoom=&amp;searchBy=namelist&amp;id=&amp;docountycitylist=2&amp;OFDTYPE=&amp;lang=ENGLISH" rel="nofollow">http://www.meganslaw.ca.gov/cg.....ng=ENGLISH</a></p>
<p>Now me, I wish I had a smile like that.</p>
<p>Well, Keith&#8230;anything else you want to share with the class?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -DOUG-</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/comment-page-1/#comment-1071648</link>
		<dc:creator>-DOUG-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/#comment-1071648</guid>
		<description>Oh, it&#039;s FIBER BRAN? I get it, you&#039;re a CEREAL.

But I&#039;m curious what &quot;Misconceptions&quot; that our laws are based on. I remember when a sweeper truck driver around here witnessed a gang rape in hte middle of the night and drove on and never said anything. When the police eventually questined if he&#039;d saen anything, he told them everything, and said he went off and ignored it &quot;In case she wound up having a good time.&quot; Laughing as he said it. Let&#039;s just say I heard him say it. Has he identified one of the misconceptions here?

I mean, if it&#039;s just a myth that it&#039;s wrong to drug a 13 year old unconcious and rape her, you&#039;d better let the L.A. courts know; or this Roman Polanski thing will just keep dragging on.

But I get the idea that the box of cereal is wrong, you&#039;re not just a nut with something to babble. You&#039;re on that registry, aren&#039;t you. I didn&#039;t read much of your nonsense the first time, but I did this time; that&#039;s one advanced psychosis you have going there, trying to justify yourself. Or do you just know you&#039;ve done things that COULD land you on that registry?

Meanwhile, let&#039;s make the commercial for the cereal:

.                                           FIREBRAND38
.     (Speaking before crowd)
Fiber bran is also good with milk poured on.
.     (All near him dowse him with milk)
Not ME, the CEREAL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, it&#8217;s FIBER BRAN? I get it, you&#8217;re a CEREAL.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m curious what &#8220;Misconceptions&#8221; that our laws are based on. I remember when a sweeper truck driver around here witnessed a gang rape in hte middle of the night and drove on and never said anything. When the police eventually questined if he&#8217;d saen anything, he told them everything, and said he went off and ignored it &#8220;In case she wound up having a good time.&#8221; Laughing as he said it. Let&#8217;s just say I heard him say it. Has he identified one of the misconceptions here?</p>
<p>I mean, if it&#8217;s just a myth that it&#8217;s wrong to drug a 13 year old unconcious and rape her, you&#8217;d better let the L.A. courts know; or this Roman Polanski thing will just keep dragging on.</p>
<p>But I get the idea that the box of cereal is wrong, you&#8217;re not just a nut with something to babble. You&#8217;re on that registry, aren&#8217;t you. I didn&#8217;t read much of your nonsense the first time, but I did this time; that&#8217;s one advanced psychosis you have going there, trying to justify yourself. Or do you just know you&#8217;ve done things that COULD land you on that registry?</p>
<p>Meanwhile, let&#8217;s make the commercial for the cereal:</p>
<p>.                                           FIREBRAND38<br />
.     (Speaking before crowd)<br />
Fiber bran is also good with milk poured on.<br />
.     (All near him dowse him with milk)<br />
Not ME, the CEREAL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Richard Radford Jr</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/comment-page-1/#comment-1071646</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Richard Radford Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/#comment-1071646</guid>
		<description>Well Fiber Man you can go look again at what I sais and let it sink into your hard headed personage and maybe even re read it again because you are out and so are sex offender laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Fiber Man you can go look again at what I sais and let it sink into your hard headed personage and maybe even re read it again because you are out and so are sex offender laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/comment-page-1/#comment-1071410</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/#comment-1071410</guid>
		<description>Keith Richard Radford Jr: Keith you need to go back to whoever prescribes your meds.  I mean, you&#039;re either getting too big a dose or not enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith Richard Radford Jr: Keith you need to go back to whoever prescribes your meds.  I mean, you&#8217;re either getting too big a dose or not enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Richard Radford Jr</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/comment-page-1/#comment-1071409</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Richard Radford Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/#comment-1071409</guid>
		<description>Getting to maters that mater is something we seem to be able to get down to humbly; I would like to share this with you. This from my life experience is a true connection to the ties of races through our own sex laws which have been built on misconceptions and myth.

The Supreme Court just ruled on sex offender laws where some factions of our government think by some inert reasoning that sex offender should be quarantined like some virus steaming from draconian/Islamic law sex offenders should be executed. I have seen for myself, video taken in another country where a sex offender is placed on a pole much like the Catholics use to use a pyramid shaped object and have them sit on it and spin, the pole travels through the body looking for the throat but if not found its ok cause the sharpened end of the pole will come out somewhere. The heritage of the act is in its self a throwback to troglodyte’s who are so obsessed with sex they can find that the way to deal with the issue is as revolutionary, as war, and two wrongs don’t make a right but has in fact called up deep rooted issues of people who have had to put up with this kind of &quot;hierarchy&quot; of historic hysteria far to long. A word taken from hysterectomy, hysteria is tied to castration used to make animals less threatening right? Good old Monty Hall. Well no wonder it’s wrong, right? 

Anyway we are supposed to be the most advanced nation and we still have a death penalty when the rest of the world except for nations we are still warring with, {think!} While other nations went home our weapons dealers and torture lovers delighting in support for the death of people they don’t know or want to simply because they don’t know how to get money with out taking it from someone by force, is that supposed to includes mutilations? In my humble opinion that alone are terrorist activities as much as severed hands, ears, heads,  or making a case with nothing more than an obsession justified by lies.

The truth about the sex offender registry will come out soon enough. When it does, People will see how the use of the registry was created, and by exactly who and why and the devastation it has created and the worthlessness of the use of it. It’s origin in the Crow laws that brought disgrace to our nation allowing thieves and murderous societal bigots who have trashed any shot at making good of a program in its design to make money destroying our nation and its people. We can not play god and we can not survive using this behavior model because we are compounding the problem.

It&#039;s a ruse designed by people who are getting rich off the castration/hysterectomy/health care/physic care of people through sex laws that have gone wild. What about the people who are being used by the Medicare programs that requires these mutilations for both men and woman after they take their means of support? Can&#039;t you see? You have created the model and it is worthless! Why don&#039;t you just indiscriminately kill people you don&#039;t know that’s statically the next sex offender because over 90% of all new offences are people not on the sex offender registry and the numbers are increasing not decreasing so as a behavior model the chumps put together is really screwed up and they were told before they tried it. So what is the use of such laws as the sex offender registry other than to terrorize people? With the murder of so many sex offenders and the continued disregard for life by the use of the registry it’s just a mater of time before the federal government will be held liable for the deaths through federal court.

In a nation where a statement may have a double or triple meaning and our entire linage can be traced through mud, guts, and beer it’s nice once in a while to get the picture of what is meant instead of what some thinks someone may have implied. So it is from the trenches to the hill. Remember the game where someone says something in someone’s ear then passes it the same way to the next; the person advocating such destructive laws are the ones who need to be section 8 by simple brake down of the issue not sex offenders. Best regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting to maters that mater is something we seem to be able to get down to humbly; I would like to share this with you. This from my life experience is a true connection to the ties of races through our own sex laws which have been built on misconceptions and myth.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court just ruled on sex offender laws where some factions of our government think by some inert reasoning that sex offender should be quarantined like some virus steaming from draconian/Islamic law sex offenders should be executed. I have seen for myself, video taken in another country where a sex offender is placed on a pole much like the Catholics use to use a pyramid shaped object and have them sit on it and spin, the pole travels through the body looking for the throat but if not found its ok cause the sharpened end of the pole will come out somewhere. The heritage of the act is in its self a throwback to troglodyte’s who are so obsessed with sex they can find that the way to deal with the issue is as revolutionary, as war, and two wrongs don’t make a right but has in fact called up deep rooted issues of people who have had to put up with this kind of &#8220;hierarchy&#8221; of historic hysteria far to long. A word taken from hysterectomy, hysteria is tied to castration used to make animals less threatening right? Good old Monty Hall. Well no wonder it’s wrong, right? </p>
<p>Anyway we are supposed to be the most advanced nation and we still have a death penalty when the rest of the world except for nations we are still warring with, {think!} While other nations went home our weapons dealers and torture lovers delighting in support for the death of people they don’t know or want to simply because they don’t know how to get money with out taking it from someone by force, is that supposed to includes mutilations? In my humble opinion that alone are terrorist activities as much as severed hands, ears, heads,  or making a case with nothing more than an obsession justified by lies.</p>
<p>The truth about the sex offender registry will come out soon enough. When it does, People will see how the use of the registry was created, and by exactly who and why and the devastation it has created and the worthlessness of the use of it. It’s origin in the Crow laws that brought disgrace to our nation allowing thieves and murderous societal bigots who have trashed any shot at making good of a program in its design to make money destroying our nation and its people. We can not play god and we can not survive using this behavior model because we are compounding the problem.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a ruse designed by people who are getting rich off the castration/hysterectomy/health care/physic care of people through sex laws that have gone wild. What about the people who are being used by the Medicare programs that requires these mutilations for both men and woman after they take their means of support? Can&#8217;t you see? You have created the model and it is worthless! Why don&#8217;t you just indiscriminately kill people you don&#8217;t know that’s statically the next sex offender because over 90% of all new offences are people not on the sex offender registry and the numbers are increasing not decreasing so as a behavior model the chumps put together is really screwed up and they were told before they tried it. So what is the use of such laws as the sex offender registry other than to terrorize people? With the murder of so many sex offenders and the continued disregard for life by the use of the registry it’s just a mater of time before the federal government will be held liable for the deaths through federal court.</p>
<p>In a nation where a statement may have a double or triple meaning and our entire linage can be traced through mud, guts, and beer it’s nice once in a while to get the picture of what is meant instead of what some thinks someone may have implied. So it is from the trenches to the hill. Remember the game where someone says something in someone’s ear then passes it the same way to the next; the person advocating such destructive laws are the ones who need to be section 8 by simple brake down of the issue not sex offenders. Best regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beauzeaux</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/comment-page-1/#comment-999219</link>
		<dc:creator>Beauzeaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 07:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/#comment-999219</guid>
		<description>Ugh...bad syntax in the title of the article. The law itself was radical, not the newness of the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh&#8230;bad syntax in the title of the article. The law itself was radical, not the newness of the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/comment-page-1/#comment-994588</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 17:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/06/a-radically-new-sex-law/#comment-994588</guid>
		<description>A couple of interesting point, the new law decriminalized  sex with animals, and the way this is article is worded, it sounds like a sex show between a child and an animal would be legal as long as no violence was in evidence or money was given to the child.

I wonder if paying for sex with stocks or bonds would be legal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of interesting point, the new law decriminalized  sex with animals, and the way this is article is worded, it sounds like a sex show between a child and an animal would be legal as long as no violence was in evidence or money was given to the child.</p>
<p>I wonder if paying for sex with stocks or bonds would be legal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
