<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Camera Is Also Projector</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/04/movie-camera-is-also-projector/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/04/movie-camera-is-also-projector/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/04/movie-camera-is-also-projector/#comment-1045619</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/04/movie-camera-is-also-projector/#comment-1045619</guid>
		<description>I read about this.
One drawback was a sprocket malfunction would scratch the center of the image.

I never noticed WWII film in this format.
(But then... how would I know?)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9.5_mm_film</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read about this.<br />
One drawback was a sprocket malfunction would scratch the center of the image.</p>
<p>I never noticed WWII film in this format.<br />
(But then&#8230; how would I know?)</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9.5_mm_film" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9.5_mm_film</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
