<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCIENCE ON THE MARCH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:55:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nlpnt</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/comment-page-1/#comment-1046673</link>
		<dc:creator>nlpnt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046673</guid>
		<description>Mr. Leydenfrost&#039;s future car is somewhat accurate except for the bubble top (everyone thought we&#039;d have these) and lack of prominence given to the wheels (no one saw the big-wheels-pushed-out-to-the-corners look coming)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Leydenfrost&#8217;s future car is somewhat accurate except for the bubble top (everyone thought we&#8217;d have these) and lack of prominence given to the wheels (no one saw the big-wheels-pushed-out-to-the-corners look coming)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7b</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/comment-page-1/#comment-1046590</link>
		<dc:creator>7b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046590</guid>
		<description>Um, yes James. That&#039;s exactly what he said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, yes James. That&#8217;s exactly what he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/comment-page-1/#comment-1046547</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046547</guid>
		<description>Jay: No I just had to make a bunch of corrections by hand.  Doing the OCR is always the biggest pain of posting here, but I&#039;ve gotten pretty quick at it. There are small problems with almost every article. But after I spell check and clean them up with some macros I&#039;ve written it&#039;s not that bad.

The worst things to OCR are articles where the text isn&#039;t in rectangular sections, eg, when they wrap around a circular inset or something. The second worst is fractions. It hates fractions. 1/2 always ends up as % or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay: No I just had to make a bunch of corrections by hand.  Doing the OCR is always the biggest pain of posting here, but I&#8217;ve gotten pretty quick at it. There are small problems with almost every article. But after I spell check and clean them up with some macros I&#8217;ve written it&#8217;s not that bad.</p>
<p>The worst things to OCR are articles where the text isn&#8217;t in rectangular sections, eg, when they wrap around a circular inset or something. The second worst is fractions. It hates fractions. 1/2 always ends up as % or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/comment-page-1/#comment-1046544</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046544</guid>
		<description>Charlie... Did you have to type the article by hand?
Couldn&#039;t the colors be stripped   away after scanning?

I read that the  most OCR  unfriendly project ever was the Websters Dictionary.
Each word  had  up to 30 different typestyles and sizes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie&#8230; Did you have to type the article by hand?<br />
Couldn&#8217;t the colors be stripped   away after scanning?</p>
<p>I read that the  most OCR  unfriendly project ever was the Websters Dictionary.<br />
Each word  had  up to 30 different typestyles and sizes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Schend</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/comment-page-1/#comment-1046518</link>
		<dc:creator>James Schend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046518</guid>
		<description>Too bad Karl Compton didn&#039;t predict OCR software, or he may have requested that they leave the balloons out. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad Karl Compton didn&#8217;t predict OCR software, or he may have requested that they leave the balloons out. <img src='http://blog.modernmechanix.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
