<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCIENCE ON THE MARCH</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nlpnt</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046673</link>
		<dc:creator>nlpnt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046673</guid>
		<description>Mr. Leydenfrost's future car is somewhat accurate except for the bubble top (everyone thought we'd have these) and lack of prominence given to the wheels (no one saw the big-wheels-pushed-out-to-the-corners look coming)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Leydenfrost&#8217;s future car is somewhat accurate except for the bubble top (everyone thought we&#8217;d have these) and lack of prominence given to the wheels (no one saw the big-wheels-pushed-out-to-the-corners look coming)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7b</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046590</link>
		<dc:creator>7b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046590</guid>
		<description>Um, yes James. That's exactly what he said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, yes James. That&#8217;s exactly what he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046547</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046547</guid>
		<description>Jay: No I just had to make a bunch of corrections by hand.  Doing the OCR is always the biggest pain of posting here, but I've gotten pretty quick at it. There are small problems with almost every article. But after I spell check and clean them up with some macros I've written it's not that bad.

The worst things to OCR are articles where the text isn't in rectangular sections, eg, when they wrap around a circular inset or something. The second worst is fractions. It hates fractions. 1/2 always ends up as % or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay: No I just had to make a bunch of corrections by hand.  Doing the OCR is always the biggest pain of posting here, but I&#8217;ve gotten pretty quick at it. There are small problems with almost every article. But after I spell check and clean them up with some macros I&#8217;ve written it&#8217;s not that bad.</p>
<p>The worst things to OCR are articles where the text isn&#8217;t in rectangular sections, eg, when they wrap around a circular inset or something. The second worst is fractions. It hates fractions. 1/2 always ends up as % or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046544</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046544</guid>
		<description>Charlie... Did you have to type the article by hand?
Couldn't the colors be stripped   away after scanning?

I read that the  most OCR  unfriendly project ever was the Websters Dictionary.
Each word  had  up to 30 different typestyles and sizes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie&#8230; Did you have to type the article by hand?<br />
Couldn&#8217;t the colors be stripped   away after scanning?</p>
<p>I read that the  most OCR  unfriendly project ever was the Websters Dictionary.<br />
Each word  had  up to 30 different typestyles and sizes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Schend</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046518</link>
		<dc:creator>James Schend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/11/science-on-the-march/#comment-1046518</guid>
		<description>Too bad Karl Compton didn't predict OCR software, or he may have requested that they leave the balloons out. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad Karl Compton didn&#8217;t predict OCR software, or he may have requested that they leave the balloons out. <img src='http://blog.modernmechanix.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
