<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CADILLAC  (Oct, 1931)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/15/cadillac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/15/cadillac/</link>
	<description>Yesterday&#039;s tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:33:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: another</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/15/cadillac/comment-page-1/#comment-1047619</link>
		<dc:creator>another</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/15/cadillac/#comment-1047619</guid>
		<description>compared to the Duesenberg, and the Marmon V16&#039;s, the Cadillacs were under powered.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duesenberg

http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/2364/Marmon-V16-Coupe-Convertible.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>compared to the Duesenberg, and the Marmon V16&#8242;s, the Cadillacs were under powered.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duesenberg" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duesenberg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/2364/Marmon-V16-Coupe-Convertible.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ultimatecarpage.com.....tible.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nlpnt</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/15/cadillac/comment-page-1/#comment-1046911</link>
		<dc:creator>nlpnt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 02:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/15/cadillac/#comment-1046911</guid>
		<description>Cadillac stayed with the funeral-formal look from the &#039;70s for far too long</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cadillac stayed with the funeral-formal look from the &#8217;70s for far too long</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

