<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Air Liners Have Berth Facilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/28/air-liners-have-berth-facilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/28/air-liners-have-berth-facilities/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/28/air-liners-have-berth-facilities/#comment-1047863</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/28/air-liners-have-berth-facilities/#comment-1047863</guid>
		<description>FB: Nice to hear the sense of community. Feel like writing a guest post for our blog? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FB: Nice to hear the sense of community. Feel like writing a guest post for our blog? <img src='http://blog.modernmechanix.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/28/air-liners-have-berth-facilities/#comment-1047862</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/28/air-liners-have-berth-facilities/#comment-1047862</guid>
		<description>See also our own blog http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/31/new-de-luxe-sleeper-planes/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See also our own blog <a href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/01/31/new-de-luxe-sleeper-planes/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.modernmechanix.com.....er-planes/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/28/air-liners-have-berth-facilities/#comment-1047656</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 05:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/28/air-liners-have-berth-facilities/#comment-1047656</guid>
		<description>The DC-3 DST had a similar arrangement (with upper and lower berths) but it first flew about a year and a half after this article was published http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Aerospace/DC-3/Aero29.htm

Also see http://www.dc3airways.com/aa_photos.html and http://www.stinsonflyer.com/prop/idc3-2.jpg for the DST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DC-3 DST had a similar arrangement (with upper and lower berths) but it first flew about a year and a half after this article was published <a href="http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Aerospace/DC-3/Aero29.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.centennialofflight......Aero29.htm</a></p>
<p>Also see <a href="http://www.dc3airways.com/aa_photos.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dc3airways.com/aa_photos.html</a> and <a href="http://www.stinsonflyer.com/prop/idc3-2.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.stinsonflyer.com/prop/idc3-2.jpg</a> for the DST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan J. Richer</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/28/air-liners-have-berth-facilities/#comment-1047629</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan J. Richer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/28/air-liners-have-berth-facilities/#comment-1047629</guid>
		<description>I think you're right - the only other one that comes to mind is the DST (Douglas Sleeper Transport - the first production DC3s) and I believe they used a folding bunk though I'm not positive on that.

                            Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right - the only other one that comes to mind is the DST (Douglas Sleeper Transport - the first production DC3s) and I believe they used a folding bunk though I&#8217;m not positive on that.</p>
<p>                            Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/28/air-liners-have-berth-facilities/#comment-1047618</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/02/28/air-liners-have-berth-facilities/#comment-1047618</guid>
		<description>Oddly enough, these airliners were quite luxurious.  Unless I miss my guess this article is referring to the Curtiss Condor II T-32 airliner.  It was a biplane and carried only 12 passengers.
American Airways later became American Airlines, of course.


http://modelingmadness.com/reviews/civil/cazcondor.htm
http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=4251</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly enough, these airliners were quite luxurious.  Unless I miss my guess this article is referring to the Curtiss Condor II T-32 airliner.  It was a biplane and carried only 12 passengers.<br />
American Airways later became American Airlines, of course.</p>
<p><a href="http://modelingmadness.com/reviews/civil/cazcondor.htm" rel="nofollow">http://modelingmadness.com/rev.....condor.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=4251" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalmuseum.af.m.....sp?id=4251</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
