<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Doubling Univac&#8217;s Speed!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/03/doubling-univacs-speed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/03/doubling-univacs-speed/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:04:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mlines</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/03/doubling-univacs-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-1052383</link>
		<dc:creator>mlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/03/doubling-univacs-speed/#comment-1052383</guid>
		<description>Core memory is immune to electromagnetic pulse (EMP).  Back in the &#039;70s I was shown core memory cards in equipment inside a missile defense command capsule.  Core has less bytes per volume than other memory of the era, but it does no good in a war to have your memory wiped out by an EMP from a nuke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Core memory is immune to electromagnetic pulse (EMP).  Back in the &#8217;70s I was shown core memory cards in equipment inside a missile defense command capsule.  Core has less bytes per volume than other memory of the era, but it does no good in a war to have your memory wiped out by an EMP from a nuke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan J. Richer</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/03/doubling-univacs-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-1047874</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan J. Richer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/03/doubling-univacs-speed/#comment-1047874</guid>
		<description>Unless it&#039;s deliberately demagnetized it won&#039;t erase. This is very unlike modern semiconductor memory (which is capacitor-based) where the locations have to be refreshed on a very short cycle to maintain their integrity.

There was static semiconductor memory, but even that would lose its storage if power was removed. Yes, I know there were PROMs, EPROMs and other types of static semiconductor memory but these were never used as system memory as core was.

                         Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless it&#8217;s deliberately demagnetized it won&#8217;t erase. This is very unlike modern semiconductor memory (which is capacitor-based) where the locations have to be refreshed on a very short cycle to maintain their integrity.</p>
<p>There was static semiconductor memory, but even that would lose its storage if power was removed. Yes, I know there were PROMs, EPROMs and other types of static semiconductor memory but these were never used as system memory as core was.</p>
<p>                         Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/03/doubling-univacs-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-1047791</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/03/doubling-univacs-speed/#comment-1047791</guid>
		<description>My understanding is that one of the big advantages of core memory is that it&#039;s very hard to accidentally erase. It&#039;s not vulnerable to cosmic rays and such.  That is one reason they used it for certain parts of the memory for the space shuttle. I remember reading somewhere that when the challenger blew up they reassembled the core memory (each ring was numbered) and read the data from the moment it exploded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding is that one of the big advantages of core memory is that it&#8217;s very hard to accidentally erase. It&#8217;s not vulnerable to cosmic rays and such.  That is one reason they used it for certain parts of the memory for the space shuttle. I remember reading somewhere that when the challenger blew up they reassembled the core memory (each ring was numbered) and read the data from the moment it exploded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dillenger69</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/03/doubling-univacs-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-1047788</link>
		<dc:creator>Dillenger69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/03/doubling-univacs-speed/#comment-1047788</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s spooky is that that very magnetic core memory was at the heart of the Sperry Univac cp890 I worked on in the late 80s and early 90s while in the navy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s spooky is that that very magnetic core memory was at the heart of the Sperry Univac cp890 I worked on in the late 80s and early 90s while in the navy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
