<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Efficient Antenna for Auto Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/08/efficient-antenna-for-auto-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/08/efficient-antenna-for-auto-radio/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:00:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Casandro</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/08/efficient-antenna-for-auto-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-1048280</link>
		<dc:creator>Casandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/08/efficient-antenna-for-auto-radio/#comment-1048280</guid>
		<description>Under the car is probably the worst place to put an antenna. Not only would it be shielded on the top by the car, but also on the bottom by dirt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under the car is probably the worst place to put an antenna. Not only would it be shielded on the top by the car, but also on the bottom by dirt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/08/efficient-antenna-for-auto-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-1048236</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/03/08/efficient-antenna-for-auto-radio/#comment-1048236</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how that would be more efficient than one mounted higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how that would be more efficient than one mounted higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
