Pleasure-Tower Half Mile High (Jul, 1933)
Filed under: Architecture, Impractical — @ 10:09 pm
Source: Modern Mechanix ( More articles from this issue )
Issue: Jul, 1933
| Buy on Ebay
Source: Modern Mechanix ( More articles from this issue )
Issue: Jul, 1933
| Buy on Ebay
Pleasure-Tower Half Mile High
Towering almost half a mile above the ground, dwarfing such gigantic structures as the Empire State Building and the Eiffel tower, a huge concrete tower 2300 feet high, surmounted with a beacon and built with a spiral ramp for autos to climb up its sides, stuns the imagination with its vastness. It is the design of the French engineer, M. Freyssinet, intended for the 1937 Paris Exhibition. He estimates the cost at less than half the Eiffel Tower, or in the neighborhood of $2,500,000. It will be called the “Phare du Monde,” or Lighthouse of the World- The project appears far removed from the visionary and a new all-time “high” in buildings seems in a fair way to being achieved.
a car crash on that spiral would be a major disaster and if it went over the side would take out the lower parts of the spiral
Comment by Davros — April 6, 2008 @ 10:23 pm
I can’t imagine your 30s-era transmission lasting the whole way up either.
Comment by AndyB — April 6, 2008 @ 10:47 pm
Wow, that was actually way back when people still believed automobiles had any future.
Comment by Casandro — April 7, 2008 @ 3:03 am
No Freudian remarks?
Sometimes a steel and concrete tower is just a steel and concrete tower.
Comment by jayessell — April 7, 2008 @ 5:34 am
I hope they planned rest stops….
Comment by galagator — April 7, 2008 @ 7:31 am
Anytime I see a spiral ramp at a parking garage, it is covered with paint scrapes from cars cutting the corner too close. I’m sure this designer owned an autobody shop.
Comment by Myles — April 7, 2008 @ 9:26 am
It would be a fun ride down when your breaks fail.
Comment by Thundercat — April 7, 2008 @ 11:49 am
If’n the picture is to scale the diameter of the base is 1/5 the height of the beacon. That puts the circumference at about 1445 feet or .27 miles. There are 29 turns of the ramp so a rough estimate would be a little less than 7.5 miles to the top or a half hour drive at 15 miles per hour.
Seeing how this is 75 years later and the number of privately owned automobiles still increase every year, I would say automobiles will still be with us for quite some time to come.
Hydraulic brakes had appeared just a few years before this and wouldn’t be standard on every car for another 20 years so the trip down would be a white knuckle ride for sure.
Comment by jmyint — April 7, 2008 @ 2:50 pm
I’d have a double helix of ramps.
One going up. One going down.
Would that make them too steep?
Comment by jayessell — April 7, 2008 @ 3:28 pm
See one in glorious Supermarionation!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3P_OjSEI8E
Comment by jayessell — April 7, 2008 @ 3:37 pm
I was wondering what kind of pleasure was worth the drive up?
Comment by Rick Auricchio — April 7, 2008 @ 5:03 pm
I can’t imagine how he planned to have deliveries made to the restaurant at the top, let alone piping fresh water up that high.
Comment by Anne — April 7, 2008 @ 5:40 pm
Elevators and loading docks did exist in the 30s. The tower’s probably hollow in the center for the elevator shafts. It doesn’t look like he left room to hide a water tank on the top. It might still work if it’s right below the garage.
My biggest concern would be driving all the way up there and finding out the restaurant lost your reservation to someone with a bigger bribe.
Comment by Benzene — April 8, 2008 @ 8:19 pm
It does say that there are elevators. But with a 2000 person capacity restaurant, it seems that there would have to be a continuous flow of edibles in and garbage out. Maybe the water tank is in the center of the garage?
And maybe he planned a telephone/telegraph station at the bottom, to confirm reservations. Though, probably not.
Comment by Anne — April 8, 2008 @ 9:22 pm
The idea of building a tower might make sense if it is economically viable. But the idea of driving up the outside of the tower on a never ending spiral is too idiotic for words.
Comment by Myles — April 9, 2008 @ 9:19 am
That French idea is great! Just imagine: if you were to really make it to the top platform without getting sick you could wave to your relatives and friends standing on the roof platform of the Empire State Building in New York.
Comment by N6 — April 12, 2008 @ 8:56 am
Restaurant capacity: 2,000
Parking capacity: 500
I guess everyone is bringing the kids, or maybe the in-laws.
Comment by beagledad — May 28, 2008 @ 3:42 pm
WTF? you have to drive up that silly thing to park your car in the 2000 foot garage? could cars at the time handle 40 degree inclines going up?
Why not just put up an elevator. Well, that would be too easy.
Comment by Al Bear — March 31, 2009 @ 10:08 am
sorry, but the phrase “pleasure tower” combined with an obviously phallic apperance makes me laugh.
Comment by mickey — April 6, 2009 @ 9:02 am