<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NEW ELEVATOR WORKS WITHOUT CABLES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053911</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053911</guid>
		<description>There is one of these installed in the New York Hall of Science, in the part of the building that dates from the World's Fair.  When I worked there a few years ago employees would avoid it like the plague as you were more likely to get stuck then to make it your destination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one of these installed in the New York Hall of Science, in the part of the building that dates from the World&#8217;s Fair.  When I worked there a few years ago employees would avoid it like the plague as you were more likely to get stuck then to make it your destination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Auricchio</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053286</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Auricchio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053286</guid>
		<description>A paternoster is a two-shaft elevator. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternoster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A paternoster is a two-shaft elevator. See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternoster" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternoster</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053257</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053257</guid>
		<description>I know that Otis had designed a vertical/horizontal elevator called the Odyssey during the 90's. Not sure what happened with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that Otis had designed a vertical/horizontal elevator called the Odyssey during the 90&#8217;s. Not sure what happened with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thundercat</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053255</link>
		<dc:creator>Thundercat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053255</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure if these count, but the elevator that goes up the Eiffel tower, the one that goes up the St. Louis Arch, and the elevators at the Luxor in Las Vegas all move horizontally as well as they move up and down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if these count, but the elevator that goes up the Eiffel tower, the one that goes up the St. Louis Arch, and the elevators at the Luxor in Las Vegas all move horizontally as well as they move up and down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053249</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053249</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea.
The elevator shaft doesn't have to be vertical and
doesn't have to be in the center of the building.

Are there any two axis elevators, real or proposed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea.<br />
The elevator shaft doesn&#8217;t have to be vertical and<br />
doesn&#8217;t have to be in the center of the building.</p>
<p>Are there any two axis elevators, real or proposed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myles</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053246</link>
		<dc:creator>Myles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053246</guid>
		<description>Oh - I see, never mind :)  This system would probably take way to much energy as there does not seem to be a counterweight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh - I see, never mind <img src='http://blog.modernmechanix.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  This system would probably take way to much energy as there does not seem to be a counterweight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myles</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053244</link>
		<dc:creator>Myles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053244</guid>
		<description>It is a clever idea for a propulsion system.  It would depend on how much power it uses compared to other systems.  I do not get how adding more than one car to the same shaft could ever work - the two cars would need to be able to pass each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a clever idea for a propulsion system.  It would depend on how much power it uses compared to other systems.  I do not get how adding more than one car to the same shaft could ever work - the two cars would need to be able to pass each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benzene</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053239</link>
		<dc:creator>Benzene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/16/new-elevator-works-without-cables/#comment-1053239</guid>
		<description>Wouldn't it be easier to just reverse the direction the drum turns when it needs to go down?  You'd be able to reuse the old cable-driven elevator shafts, at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be easier to just reverse the direction the drum turns when it needs to go down?  You&#8217;d be able to reuse the old cable-driven elevator shafts, at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
