<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Russia Defeat Us With Atom Bombs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Odon</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1058322</link>
		<dc:creator>Odon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1058322</guid>
		<description>So after scaring the shit out of readers with that article they finish by calling for international understanding and peace.

But for a more realistic view of what would have happened to the USA in there'd been a limited nuclear war, check out the alternative-history novel â€œResurrection Dayâ€ by Brendan DuBos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So after scaring the shit out of readers with that article they finish by calling for international understanding and peace.</p>
<p>But for a more realistic view of what would have happened to the USA in there&#8217;d been a limited nuclear war, check out the alternative-history novel â€œResurrection Dayâ€ by Brendan DuBos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053637</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053637</guid>
		<description>Well joe (if that's how it's spelled) I take it that it's your position that neither communists or terrorists exist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well joe (if that&#8217;s how it&#8217;s spelled) I take it that it&#8217;s your position that neither communists or terrorists exist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053622</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053622</guid>
		<description>before comunism.. now terrorism... usa is a seek nation.this country needs a revolusion now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>before comunism.. now terrorism&#8230; usa is a seek nation.this country needs a revolusion now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmyint</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053615</link>
		<dc:creator>jmyint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053615</guid>
		<description>Jayesell by 1950 the Soviets had only tested one bomb, the US had detonated 8 between the two of them there were probably not more than 100 bombs at the time most about the yield of the Nagasaki bomb or less so mutually assured destruction was not yet an option.  Attack on warning also wasn't an option as the B-36's lacked the station keeping abilities of the later B-52's.  Lying about the number of bombs would have been difficult for the Soviets as it is impossible to hide a nuclear test and estimates can be drawn from the number of tests and by 1958 the Soviets had tested 83 bombs.  

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/

http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=360</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jayesell by 1950 the Soviets had only tested one bomb, the US had detonated 8 between the two of them there were probably not more than 100 bombs at the time most about the yield of the Nagasaki bomb or less so mutually assured destruction was not yet an option.  Attack on warning also wasn&#8217;t an option as the B-36&#8217;s lacked the station keeping abilities of the later B-52&#8217;s.  Lying about the number of bombs would have been difficult for the Soviets as it is impossible to hide a nuclear test and estimates can be drawn from the number of tests and by 1958 the Soviets had tested 83 bombs.  </p>
<p><a href="http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/" rel="nofollow">http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=360" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalmuseum.af.m.....asp?id=360</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053571</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053571</guid>
		<description>No mention of M.A.D.?
Attack on warning?
(How we survived &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; I'll never know.)
Rooski double agents exagerated the number of Soviet bombers (and later missles)
causing the US to build more than was needed.
They should have told the truth or said they hardly had any!
[Citation needed.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No mention of M.A.D.?<br />
Attack on warning?<br />
(How we survived <i>that</i> I&#8217;ll never know.)<br />
Rooski double agents exagerated the number of Soviet bombers (and later missles)<br />
causing the US to build more than was needed.<br />
They should have told the truth or said they hardly had any!<br />
[Citation needed.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Synnott</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053520</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Synnott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053520</guid>
		<description>At the time, multi-megaton bombs were not available, and people would probably have been far less clear on what a nuclear explosion looked like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the time, multi-megaton bombs were not available, and people would probably have been far less clear on what a nuclear explosion looked like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benzene</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053518</link>
		<dc:creator>Benzene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053518</guid>
		<description>I think it's one of those prehistoric photoshops.  They took a recognizable city skyline and put the mushroom cloud behind it.  If it had been accurate, the skyline would have been just another dust cloud.  They wanted the buildings to remain to increase the propaganda factor.  As if the Statue of Liberty looking mournfully on isn't enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s one of those prehistoric photoshops.  They took a recognizable city skyline and put the mushroom cloud behind it.  If it had been accurate, the skyline would have been just another dust cloud.  They wanted the buildings to remain to increase the propaganda factor.  As if the Statue of Liberty looking mournfully on isn&#8217;t enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hip2b2</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053513</link>
		<dc:creator>Hip2b2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053513</guid>
		<description>The interesting difference between then and now is that any attack on the manufacturing heartland of America would now take place in China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interesting difference between then and now is that any attack on the manufacturing heartland of America would now take place in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remek</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053508</link>
		<dc:creator>Remek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/04/20/can-russia-defeat-us-with-atom-bombs/#comment-1053508</guid>
		<description>Wow, that artwork is so wrong in so many ways.

Either the artist was totally ignorant of the effects of a megaton-sized airburst bomb a few miles away, and the story and art editor didn't care; or, the editorial staff were ignorant and to blame for instructing the artist to stick to only their own vision of that type of nuclear bomb strike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that artwork is so wrong in so many ways.</p>
<p>Either the artist was totally ignorant of the effects of a megaton-sized airburst bomb a few miles away, and the story and art editor didn&#8217;t care; or, the editorial staff were ignorant and to blame for instructing the artist to stick to only their own vision of that type of nuclear bomb strike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
