<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Small wonder: a breadbox-size computer with up to 1 million bytes of fault-control, semiconductor memory at 5c a byte.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/05/01/small-wonder-a-breadbox-size-computer-with-up-to-1-million-bytes-of-fault-control-semiconductor-memory%e2%80%94at-5c-a-byte/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/05/01/small-wonder-a-breadbox-size-computer-with-up-to-1-million-bytes-of-fault-control-semiconductor-memory%e2%80%94at-5c-a-byte/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:33:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KHarn</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/05/01/small-wonder-a-breadbox-size-computer-with-up-to-1-million-bytes-of-fault-control-semiconductor-memory%e2%80%94at-5c-a-byte/comment-page-1/#comment-1054181</link>
		<dc:creator>KHarn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 14:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=4395#comment-1054181</guid>
		<description>&quot;Grandpa, what&#039;s a BREADBOX?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Grandpa, what&#8217;s a BREADBOX?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Berlin</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/05/01/small-wonder-a-breadbox-size-computer-with-up-to-1-million-bytes-of-fault-control-semiconductor-memory%e2%80%94at-5c-a-byte/comment-page-1/#comment-1054169</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 08:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=4395#comment-1054169</guid>
		<description>it was worth it not to have Windows Vista</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was worth it not to have Windows Vista</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Auricchio</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/05/01/small-wonder-a-breadbox-size-computer-with-up-to-1-million-bytes-of-fault-control-semiconductor-memory%e2%80%94at-5c-a-byte/comment-page-1/#comment-1054153</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Auricchio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 00:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=4395#comment-1054153</guid>
		<description>I recall studying Hamming ECC codes in college. Probably took the class in 1971.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall studying Hamming ECC codes in college. Probably took the class in 1971.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Githyanki</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/05/01/small-wonder-a-breadbox-size-computer-with-up-to-1-million-bytes-of-fault-control-semiconductor-memory%e2%80%94at-5c-a-byte/comment-page-1/#comment-1054120</link>
		<dc:creator>Githyanki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=4395#comment-1054120</guid>
		<description>They had some mighty big bread boxes back then too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They had some mighty big bread boxes back then too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fluffy</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/05/01/small-wonder-a-breadbox-size-computer-with-up-to-1-million-bytes-of-fault-control-semiconductor-memory%e2%80%94at-5c-a-byte/comment-page-1/#comment-1054108</link>
		<dc:creator>fluffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 06:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=4395#comment-1054108</guid>
		<description>Huh, I didn&#039;t realize systems had ECC RAM back then (it&#039;s what&#039;s referred to as &quot;Hamming-code error correction&quot; - ECC is often implemented using Hamming codes).  It makes sense that they would in a system they&#039;re advertising as being fault-tolerant, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh, I didn&#8217;t realize systems had ECC RAM back then (it&#8217;s what&#8217;s referred to as &#8220;Hamming-code error correction&#8221; &#8211; ECC is often implemented using Hamming codes).  It makes sense that they would in a system they&#8217;re advertising as being fault-tolerant, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
