<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flying Whirligig Is Newest Aircraft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/06/21/flying-whirligig-is-newest-aircraft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/06/21/flying-whirligig-is-newest-aircraft/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/06/21/flying-whirligig-is-newest-aircraft/#comment-1057538</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=4666#comment-1057538</guid>
		<description>the reason many helicopter designs failed was because many of the inventors thought of the blades as wings, and would be shaped like so. the problem was that the blades where often too heavy to move quickly, and the control surfaces where never worked out, or sometimes nonexistent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the reason many helicopter designs failed was because many of the inventors thought of the blades as wings, and would be shaped like so. the problem was that the blades where often too heavy to move quickly, and the control surfaces where never worked out, or sometimes nonexistent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/06/21/flying-whirligig-is-newest-aircraft/#comment-1057209</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 15:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=4666#comment-1057209</guid>
		<description>JMylnt; I had that in 'Classic Comics'  format.
But...
The 'suspension of disbelief' breaker for me in that story is a huge ground
vehicle  on the dirt roads of the late Nineteenth century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JMylnt; I had that in &#8216;Classic Comics&#8217;  format.<br />
But&#8230;<br />
The &#8217;suspension of disbelief&#8217; breaker for me in that story is a huge ground<br />
vehicle  on the dirt roads of the late Nineteenth century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMyint</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/06/21/flying-whirligig-is-newest-aircraft/#comment-1057208</link>
		<dc:creator>JMyint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=4666#comment-1057208</guid>
		<description>The movie "Master of the World" was based on the Jules Verne novel "Robur the Conquerer", with the exception of the character of Strock.  In the novel "Master of the World" Robur returns with a combination airplane, boat, automobile called the 'Terror'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movie &#8220;Master of the World&#8221; was based on the Jules Verne novel &#8220;Robur the Conquerer&#8221;, with the exception of the character of Strock.  In the novel &#8220;Master of the World&#8221; Robur returns with a combination airplane, boat, automobile called the &#8216;Terror&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/06/21/flying-whirligig-is-newest-aircraft/#comment-1057205</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=4666#comment-1057205</guid>
		<description>Paul:
Something  like Jules  Verne's "Albatross" from 'Master of the World'
as depicted on the screen with Vincent Price?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul:<br />
Something  like Jules  Verne&#8217;s &#8220;Albatross&#8221; from &#8216;Master of the World&#8217;<br />
as depicted on the screen with Vincent Price?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aerohydro</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/06/21/flying-whirligig-is-newest-aircraft/#comment-1057195</link>
		<dc:creator>aerohydro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 01:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=4666#comment-1057195</guid>
		<description>Did some searching for the patent that's referred to in the article, and found that Glenn Dale was actually granted two : US1981441 (for the whirligig/airplane design) and US1981442 (which was for a pure helicopter).

Both patents were issued on the same day, hence the sequential numbering.  If you think the whirlygig design is strange, just wait til you see the drawings for the helicopter - it has 16 sets of rotors, 64 blades all up!

Cheers,
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did some searching for the patent that&#8217;s referred to in the article, and found that Glenn Dale was actually granted two : US1981441 (for the whirligig/airplane design) and US1981442 (which was for a pure helicopter).</p>
<p>Both patents were issued on the same day, hence the sequential numbering.  If you think the whirlygig design is strange, just wait til you see the drawings for the helicopter - it has 16 sets of rotors, 64 blades all up!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
