<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Urge Alcohol Gas for Farm Relief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/07/07/urge-alcohol-gas-for-farm-relief/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/07/07/urge-alcohol-gas-for-farm-relief/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josef</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/07/07/urge-alcohol-gas-for-farm-relief/#comment-1058043</link>
		<dc:creator>Josef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 08:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=4729#comment-1058043</guid>
		<description>Poorer MPG doesn't mean it's worse. The fuels probably cheaper, seeing as it's taken from a surplus, and, on the subject of MPG, the Model T got upto 22 MPG, where as the 2003 Jeep Wrangler gets 17 MPG at its highest.

It took 80 years of technological advances to get -5 MPG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poorer MPG doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s worse. The fuels probably cheaper, seeing as it&#8217;s taken from a surplus, and, on the subject of MPG, the Model T got upto 22 MPG, where as the 2003 Jeep Wrangler gets 17 MPG at its highest.</p>
<p>It took 80 years of technological advances to get -5 MPG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Auricchio</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/07/07/urge-alcohol-gas-for-farm-relief/#comment-1057834</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Auricchio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=4729#comment-1057834</guid>
		<description>This may have made sense when there was a huge corn surplus, but I don't think we have a surplus now. Probably the surplus was consumed by other uses of corn (e.g. sweetener).

The article conveniently neglects to mention that ethanol has 20% lower energy than gasoline, so you actually get poorer MPG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may have made sense when there was a huge corn surplus, but I don&#8217;t think we have a surplus now. Probably the surplus was consumed by other uses of corn (e.g. sweetener).</p>
<p>The article conveniently neglects to mention that ethanol has 20% lower energy than gasoline, so you actually get poorer MPG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
