<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Boeing &#8220;Death Angel&#8221; to be World&#8217;s Fastest Bomber</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/09/10/new-boeing-death-angel-to-be-worlds-fastest-bomber/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/09/10/new-boeing-death-angel-to-be-worlds-fastest-bomber/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:28:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Torgo</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/09/10/new-boeing-death-angel-to-be-worlds-fastest-bomber/comment-page-1/#comment-1060565</link>
		<dc:creator>Torgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=5272#comment-1060565</guid>
		<description>Who would win, Death Angel or Rotolactor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who would win, Death Angel or Rotolactor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Essjay`</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/09/10/new-boeing-death-angel-to-be-worlds-fastest-bomber/comment-page-1/#comment-1060563</link>
		<dc:creator>Essjay`</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=5272#comment-1060563</guid>
		<description>Does anybody name their product &quot;Death&quot; today? Interesting.

For big projects, they seem to prefer &quot;Peace&quot; and &quot;Protect&quot; and such.

Not &quot;Death&quot; and &quot;Destroy&quot;.

If the book has not been written already, the topic is waiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anybody name their product &#8220;Death&#8221; today? Interesting.</p>
<p>For big projects, they seem to prefer &#8220;Peace&#8221; and &#8220;Protect&#8221; and such.</p>
<p>Not &#8220;Death&#8221; and &#8220;Destroy&#8221;.</p>
<p>If the book has not been written already, the topic is waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LightningRose</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/09/10/new-boeing-death-angel-to-be-worlds-fastest-bomber/comment-page-1/#comment-1060544</link>
		<dc:creator>LightningRose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=5272#comment-1060544</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Many online sources credit Seattle Times reporter Richard Williams with coining the term &quot;flying fortress&quot; in 1935 when describing what would eventually be known as the B-17, but here the term is used in 1931.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Many online sources credit Seattle Times reporter Richard Williams with coining the term &#8220;flying fortress&#8221; in 1935 when describing what would eventually be known as the B-17, but here the term is used in 1931.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg in Seattle</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/09/10/new-boeing-death-angel-to-be-worlds-fastest-bomber/comment-page-1/#comment-1060532</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg in Seattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=5272#comment-1060532</guid>
		<description>In 1930, Boeing created the revolutionary Monomail, which made traditional biplane construction a design of the past. The Monomail wing was set lower, was smooth, made entirely of metal and had no struts (cantilevered construction). The retractable landing gear, the streamlined fuselage and the engine covered by an antidrag cowling added up to an advanced, extremely aerodynamic design.

The Monomail Model 200 was a mail plane, and the Model 221 was a six-passenger transport. Both were later revised for transcontinental passenger service as Model 221As.

The major drawback of the Monomail was that its design was too advanced for the engines and propellers of the time. The airplane required a low-pitch propeller for takeoff and climb and a high-pitch propeller to cruise. By the time the variable-pitch propeller and more powerful engines were available, the Monomail was being replaced by newer, multiengine planes it had inspired.

The Boeing B-9 bomber was the earliest plane based on the Monomail design. It had a top speed of 186 mph and could outrun the fighters of the day by 5 mph. The monoplane bomber reached this speed although it had a five-person crew (in open cockpits) and carried a 2,400-pound bomb load.

Boeing built the YB-9 prototype bombers at company expense to show their design potential to the military. This high-speed aircraft inspired other airplane manufacturers to launch a new generation of bombers, such as the Martin B-10. Because fighters were expected to be faster than bombers, the B-9 also led to the first monoplane fighters.

First flight:	April 13, 1931
Model number:	214/215
Classification:	Bomber
Span:	76 feet
Length:	51 feet 5 inches
Gross weight:	13,919 pounds
Top speed:	186 mph
Cruising speed:	158 mph
Range:	1,150 miles
Ceiling:	20,150 feet
Power:	Two 600-horsepower P&amp;W Hornet engines
Accommodation:	5 crew
Armament:	2 machine guns, 2,400-pound bomb load</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1930, Boeing created the revolutionary Monomail, which made traditional biplane construction a design of the past. The Monomail wing was set lower, was smooth, made entirely of metal and had no struts (cantilevered construction). The retractable landing gear, the streamlined fuselage and the engine covered by an antidrag cowling added up to an advanced, extremely aerodynamic design.</p>
<p>The Monomail Model 200 was a mail plane, and the Model 221 was a six-passenger transport. Both were later revised for transcontinental passenger service as Model 221As.</p>
<p>The major drawback of the Monomail was that its design was too advanced for the engines and propellers of the time. The airplane required a low-pitch propeller for takeoff and climb and a high-pitch propeller to cruise. By the time the variable-pitch propeller and more powerful engines were available, the Monomail was being replaced by newer, multiengine planes it had inspired.</p>
<p>The Boeing B-9 bomber was the earliest plane based on the Monomail design. It had a top speed of 186 mph and could outrun the fighters of the day by 5 mph. The monoplane bomber reached this speed although it had a five-person crew (in open cockpits) and carried a 2,400-pound bomb load.</p>
<p>Boeing built the YB-9 prototype bombers at company expense to show their design potential to the military. This high-speed aircraft inspired other airplane manufacturers to launch a new generation of bombers, such as the Martin B-10. Because fighters were expected to be faster than bombers, the B-9 also led to the first monoplane fighters.</p>
<p>First flight:	April 13, 1931<br />
Model number:	214/215<br />
Classification:	Bomber<br />
Span:	76 feet<br />
Length:	51 feet 5 inches<br />
Gross weight:	13,919 pounds<br />
Top speed:	186 mph<br />
Cruising speed:	158 mph<br />
Range:	1,150 miles<br />
Ceiling:	20,150 feet<br />
Power:	Two 600-horsepower P&amp;W Hornet engines<br />
Accommodation:	5 crew<br />
Armament:	2 machine guns, 2,400-pound bomb load</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toronto</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/09/10/new-boeing-death-angel-to-be-worlds-fastest-bomber/comment-page-1/#comment-1060517</link>
		<dc:creator>Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=5272#comment-1060517</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s a Boeing &quot;B-9&quot;. Perhaps they thought B9 was too benign sounding.

(Civilian version was 215 - before they started using &#039;7&#039;s.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s a Boeing &#8220;B-9&#8243;. Perhaps they thought B9 was too benign sounding.</p>
<p>(Civilian version was 215 &#8211; before they started using &#8216;7&#8217;s.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
