Comments on: Television in Three Dimensions (Feb, 1931) http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/10/03/television-in-three-dimensions/ Yesterday's tomorrow, today. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:12:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: Torgo http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/10/03/television-in-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1061123 Torgo Sat, 04 Oct 2008 02:05:50 +0000 http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=5585#comment-1061123 I would like to see what this looks like. It might actually have depth if you were waring those two colored glasses. But, I don't know. Everything would be seen from the top. Interesting idea, that's all I can say. I would like to see what this looks like. It might actually have depth if you were waring those two colored glasses. But, I don’t know. Everything would be seen from the top. Interesting idea, that’s all I can say.

]]> By: Mike http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/10/03/television-in-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1061119 Mike Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:07:44 +0000 http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=5585#comment-1061119 Before standards in television there was a 2D format that used a rotating disc to capture and display the image. It made a lot of noise which was one of its drawbacks. Before standards in television there was a 2D format that used a rotating disc to capture and display the image. It made a lot of noise which was one of its drawbacks.

]]> By: Eamon http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/10/03/television-in-three-dimensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1061111 Eamon Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:56:49 +0000 http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=5585#comment-1061111 The picture wouldn't have any depth, but it is still a really neat idea. Does that machine on his desk mean that he actually built it? The picture wouldn’t have any depth, but it is still a really neat idea.

Does that machine on his desk mean that he actually built it?

]]>