<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Glider&#8217;s Propellers Worked by Foot Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/12/02/new-gliders-propellers-worked-by-foot-power/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/12/02/new-gliders-propellers-worked-by-foot-power/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:00:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Torgo</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/12/02/new-gliders-propellers-worked-by-foot-power/comment-page-1/#comment-1063188</link>
		<dc:creator>Torgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6207#comment-1063188</guid>
		<description>Was this one of Hitler&#039;s earliest &quot;gliders?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was this one of Hitler&#8217;s earliest &#8220;gliders?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LightningRose</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/12/02/new-gliders-propellers-worked-by-foot-power/comment-page-1/#comment-1063178</link>
		<dc:creator>LightningRose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6207#comment-1063178</guid>
		<description>Modern powered gliders are still considered to be gliders (or sailplanes). 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_glider

Then there are also the foot launched variety.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powered_hang_glider
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powered_paraglider

But humans just don&#039;t have a good enough horsepower to weight ratio to be useful as aircraft engines. The above glider would probably have had better performance if the extra weight of the propeller and pedal assemblies had been discarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern powered gliders are still considered to be gliders (or sailplanes). </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_glider" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_glider</a></p>
<p>Then there are also the foot launched variety.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powered_hang_glider" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powered_hang_glider</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powered_paraglider" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powered_paraglider</a></p>
<p>But humans just don&#8217;t have a good enough horsepower to weight ratio to be useful as aircraft engines. The above glider would probably have had better performance if the extra weight of the propeller and pedal assemblies had been discarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StanFlouride</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/12/02/new-gliders-propellers-worked-by-foot-power/comment-page-1/#comment-1063174</link>
		<dc:creator>StanFlouride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6207#comment-1063174</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s no Gossamer Condor or G Albatross.
First, if it has a prop is it still a glider? Even though it is human powered it still is powered.
Second, I think the extra drag from the prop would more than override any advantages.

We know it did not work or we&#039;d have seen it again and again. But more than that the whole configuration of the craft looks like it would glide like a brick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s no Gossamer Condor or G Albatross.<br />
First, if it has a prop is it still a glider? Even though it is human powered it still is powered.<br />
Second, I think the extra drag from the prop would more than override any advantages.</p>
<p>We know it did not work or we&#8217;d have seen it again and again. But more than that the whole configuration of the craft looks like it would glide like a brick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rev pj</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2008/12/02/new-gliders-propellers-worked-by-foot-power/comment-page-1/#comment-1063163</link>
		<dc:creator>rev pj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6207#comment-1063163</guid>
		<description>Only 43 years later the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gossamer_Condor&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gossamer Condor&lt;/a&gt; took flight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only 43 years later the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gossamer_Condor" rel="nofollow">Gossamer Condor</a> took flight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
