<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TRICOPTER SKYHOOK  (Apr, 1957)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/01/21/tricopter-skyhook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/01/21/tricopter-skyhook/</link>
	<description>Yesterday&#039;s tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:33:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanglass patrol</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/01/21/tricopter-skyhook/comment-page-1/#comment-1065263</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanglass patrol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6823#comment-1065263</guid>
		<description>We have linked you
http://sandglasspatrol.livejournal.com/118511.html

(It is in Spanish)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have linked you<br />
<a href="http://sandglasspatrol.livejournal.com/118511.html" rel="nofollow">http://sandglasspatrol.livejournal.com/118511.html</a></p>
<p>(It is in Spanish)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toronto</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/01/21/tricopter-skyhook/comment-page-1/#comment-1064983</link>
		<dc:creator>Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6823#comment-1064983</guid>
		<description>Lightning - why AirForce marking on Army tanks and choppers? Maybe it&#039;s because it was designed by a Navy engineer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lightning &#8211; why AirForce marking on Army tanks and choppers? Maybe it&#8217;s because it was designed by a Navy engineer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliyahu</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/01/21/tricopter-skyhook/comment-page-1/#comment-1064982</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliyahu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6823#comment-1064982</guid>
		<description>Also, just looked at the illustration again, and I&#039;m trying to figure out why the Army would paint Air Force emblems on its tanks and helicopters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, just looked at the illustration again, and I&#8217;m trying to figure out why the Army would paint Air Force emblems on its tanks and helicopters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliyahu</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/01/21/tricopter-skyhook/comment-page-1/#comment-1064981</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliyahu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6823#comment-1064981</guid>
		<description>An insurgent&#039;s dream... A chance to take out three helicopters and a tank with a single Stinger missile...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An insurgent&#8217;s dream&#8230; A chance to take out three helicopters and a tank with a single Stinger missile&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LightningRose</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/01/21/tricopter-skyhook/comment-page-1/#comment-1064941</link>
		<dc:creator>LightningRose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6823#comment-1064941</guid>
		<description>What could possibly go wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What could possibly go wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandglass Patrol</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/01/21/tricopter-skyhook/comment-page-1/#comment-1064940</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandglass Patrol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6823#comment-1064940</guid>
		<description>Charlie, once we wrote about &#039;aeronautics fashions&#039;, because they are always traying the same things, or re-discovering old concepts. Here we discovered the flying submarine, or de submergible plane. Now DARPA is traying it again. This entry, the 3 &#039;chopers&#039; and the three Zerstorers remembered us that entry in our blog, http://sandglasspatrol.livejournal.com/56807.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie, once we wrote about &#8216;aeronautics fashions&#8217;, because they are always traying the same things, or re-discovering old concepts. Here we discovered the flying submarine, or de submergible plane. Now DARPA is traying it again. This entry, the 3 &#8216;chopers&#8217; and the three Zerstorers remembered us that entry in our blog, <a href="http://sandglasspatrol.livejournal.com/56807.html" rel="nofollow">http://sandglasspatrol.livejournal.com/56807.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/01/21/tricopter-skyhook/comment-page-1/#comment-1064936</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6823#comment-1064936</guid>
		<description>Sandglass Patrol: Damn, you beat me to it! I was totally going to say that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandglass Patrol: Damn, you beat me to it! I was totally going to say that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandglass Patrol</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/01/21/tricopter-skyhook/comment-page-1/#comment-1064935</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandglass Patrol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6823#comment-1064935</guid>
		<description>It looks like the three Bf110 Zerstorer towing the Me321</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the three Bf110 Zerstorer towing the Me321</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StanFlouride</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/01/21/tricopter-skyhook/comment-page-1/#comment-1064931</link>
		<dc:creator>StanFlouride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6823#comment-1064931</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen those pictures too but even if it did work no three helicopters would be able to lift something as heavy as a tank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen those pictures too but even if it did work no three helicopters would be able to lift something as heavy as a tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Auricchio</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/01/21/tricopter-skyhook/comment-page-1/#comment-1064924</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Auricchio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=6823#comment-1064924</guid>
		<description>I recall seeing a system like this on some documentary. One of the cables or arms failed, sending the whole mess to the ground.

Flying one chopper is hard enough with a load; coordinating three seems impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall seeing a system like this on some documentary. One of the cables or arms failed, sending the whole mess to the ground.</p>
<p>Flying one chopper is hard enough with a load; coordinating three seems impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

