GIRLIE PHOTOS! (Oct, 1949)
$2 in 1949 dollars ($17.85 in 2008 dollars) for 30 soft core pictures. That’s pretty damn expensive. Technology sure has made porn cheaper.
PHOTO COLLECTORS
I HAVE HUNDREDS of GIRLIE PHOTOS! Some very good, others not worth the paper they’re printed on. I have selected 30 ACTUAL PHOTOGRAPHS that I believe are the best ever offered for sale. ALL 5 SETS, 6 POSES TO A SET, ONLY $2.
YOU BE THE JUDGE! PRINT NAME & ADDRESS. ORDER WILL BE SENT 1st CLASS.
50c FOR A SAMPLE SET 2 SETS $1 GEM FOTOS, Box 375-J, Dayton, Ohio





They probably weren’t even naked!
Comment by Paul — January 30, 2009 @ 2:02 am
I can assure you that 1940s smut costs a site more than that now.
Comment by Vintage Scans — January 30, 2009 @ 7:10 am
If the art on the advert is anything to go by, count me out! WHAT’S HAPPENED TO HIS FEET! And WHY’S HE WEARING A BRA AND WIG?
Comment by sweavo — January 30, 2009 @ 11:10 am
I feel dirty.
Comment by Torgo — January 31, 2009 @ 12:45 am
“She” looks like recycled Charles Atlas artwork, they saved money on the ad that way.
Comment by blueferretdog — January 31, 2009 @ 8:51 am
(Looks at his harddisk)… WOW! I’m RICH!
Comment by F. — January 31, 2009 @ 12:00 pm
“… others not worth the paper they’re printed on.”
Well, at least he was honest…
Comment by docca — February 23, 2009 @ 10:57 pm