February 5, 2009

Jap Pilots Ride to DEATH on Flying Bombs (Apr, 1933)

Filed under: Aviation, Origins, War — @ 7:35 pm
Source: Modern Mechanix ( More articles from this issue )
Issue: Apr, 1933
| Buy on Ebay

I guess the kamikazes weren’t such a surprise then.

|<< << Previous 1 of 4 Next >> >>|
jap_flying_bomb_0.jpg
|<< << Previous 1 of 4 Next >> >>|
jap_flying_bomb_0.jpg jap_flying_bomb_1.jpg jap_flying_bomb_2.jpg jap_flying_bomb_3.jpg

Jap Pilots Ride to DEATH on Flying Bombs

By Ray Holt

The current conflict between Japan and China has brought out an amazing revelation of the methods by which Japanese pilots assure air bombs reaching their target by putting a man inside to steer them. Why? Read the reasons in this article, and you’ll have a better understanding of Japanese psychology toward the machines of war.

IMAGINE yourself strapped within a hollow chamber inside a huge air bomb, surrounded on all sides by high explosives. In front of you is an airplane type rudder which steers the tail unit of the bomb. Windows in the nose enable you to see ahead. You’re loaded into the bomb, which is placed in its nest under the fuselage of a bombing plane. The bomber takes off, soars above a target—say, an ammunition dump of the enemy. Up above you, the pilot of the plane pulls a lever.

Down you go, plunging toward the ground with terrific speed. You see that you aren’t going to strike the ammunition dump, but will land many yards to one side of it. So you twist the control rudder, swerving the bomb’s course. Success! The dump looms up directly below the windows of your bomb. And that is practically the end of things for you.

Sounds like the superheated imagining of a Jules Verne, doesn’t it—the sort of absurdity that a sensible man would laugh off as being unheard of, an astounding, amusing impossibility?

It’s nothing of the sort. It’s an actual fact of warfare, a method used by Japanese pilots who deem it an honor transcending all others to ride to glory for the mother country. They know that their memory and their families will be forever honored in their homeland.

Rumors of the flying bomb death ride have filtered out of the conflict now being waged by the Japanese and Chinese. Necessarily this information has been of a confidential, undercover nature, but not long ago it was given nation-wide publicity by a radio commentator on international affairs.

Japanese and Machines To make the man-steered bomb a credible actuality, an understanding of the peculiarities of the Japanese character is necessary. And some such understanding may sooner or later be forced upon, the great powers of the world who are all too likely to become involved in the aggression of Japanese militarists in China, where the United States, Great Britain, France, Italy and Germany do much business.

In the field of machinery the Japanese mind is at a peculiar disadvantage. They 1 are able to turn out an exact copy of any mechanism that comes into their hands, but the type of mechanical imagination which went into its original creation—which, for want of a better term, is sometimes known as Yankee ingenuity—they are at a loss to duplicate.

The simple truth of the matter is that -a man is practically required to steer Japanese bombs to their mark because they haven’t been able to develop the bomb-sighting machinery which makes Uncle Sam’s flyers, for instance, so deadly in their accuracy.

Peculiar Oriental Psychology As to why Japanese soldiers fight among themselves for the honor of being the bomb pilot who can look forward to being blown to certain oblivion, that’s a matter of psychology not so easy to understand. Patriotism rules the Japanese to an almost fanatical degree, and love of country is so bound up with religion—the emperor being regarded as an incarnate god—that to be blown up in a bomb to further the successes of Nippon becomes something to be desired above all things.

When one understands the popularity that hara-kiri, a form of suicide by self-disembowelment, has had among the Japanese for centuries, the national willingness to dive to death in a bomb, or in any other way, becomes credible.

Hara-kiri, as formerly practiced, was compulsory upon a noble of the higher class Who received a courteously phrased message from the mikado intimating that he must die for some offense of lawbreaking or disloyalty. The suicide, using a jeweled dagger customarily sent by the mikado for performing the act, proceeded in a prescribed ritual. Seated on a dais, surrounded by officials and friends, the suicide plunged the dagger into his stomach below the waist on the left side, drew it slowly across to the right, and turning it, gave a slight cut upward.

This compulsory suicide has been abolished, but the idea has such a striking appeal for the Japanese imagination that some 1500 hara-kiris take place annually as a purely voluntary gesture.

In the final analysis, the amazing thing is not that the Japanese should succeed in finding pilots for their man-bombs, for volunteers for such a mission of certain death can be found in any army in the world, but that such a weapon should be necessary. It simmers down to the fact, as hinted at above, that the Nipponese are conscious of their inferiority in developing new and fearful weapons of war, and are forced to rely on man-power.

A country like the United States would approach the problem of directing bomb flight in an entirely different way. Some method of mechanical control of the bomb would be sought—in fact, the idea of controlling a bomb or gun shell by radio is already being worked on, as described in Modern Mechanix and Inventions some months ago. It will be seen that, entirely aside from making the sacrifice of a man’s life unnecessary, radio control of a bomb is much more accurate and less liable to error through the failure of the human machine in a moment of critical nervous tension.

Superiority of American engineering brains over the Oriental variety is well demonstrated in the newest United States army bombing plane, a photograph of which is reproduced in these pages. It is a monoplane of all-metal construction—no wood or fabric to catch fire from incendiary bullets of the enemy—and is so well streamlined, with its landing gear pulled up under its belly, that it can do a top speed of 200 miles an hour, fully loaded with a two ton cargo of bombs. This is 80 miles an hour better than the speed of the Curtiss bomber, a biplane, previously used by the air corps.

Features of U. S. Bomber A revolving turret to protect the gunner in the nose of the ship is another feature. It diverts the rush of air and makes accurate aiming much easier. At high speeds, the windstream is so powerful that, in an ordinary ship, it has a tendency to wrench a swivel mounted gun out of the gunner’s control.

In connection with the possible need of protecting our country from Pacific aggression, the news that a government expedition has just left for an extensive survey of the Aleutian islands (which constitute the tip of the Alaskan peninsula) is important. A map, reproduced herewith, shows the extremely important location of these islands in their relation to Japan and the Orient.

Geologically, these islands are thought to be the sunken peaks of land that once connected the mainland with Asia. Siberia is but a stone’s throw distant, and the northern islands of Japan not much farther away. Since, by a recent bill passed in Congress, the United States has relinquished control of the Philippine islands, we will have no Pacific base of importance other than Hawaii and Guam, which makes the Aleutian chain all the more important in the scheme of national protection.

Strategic Importance of Islands Airplanes are being carried by the expedition and these will make a careful aerial survey of the islands. A weather observation station will probably be established on Tanago or Adak island, and the best suited of the nearby islands will be chosen as a possible base for an airplane field. Harbor facilities will be carefully charted with a view to possible installation of a naval base for ships and submarines. Alaska, of course, is a United States possession which we are free to fortify as we may see fit. An incident of the World War which has just come to light illustrates the ingenuity of the western mind in the world of machines. German engineers designed a mine fitted with clockwork which permitted the device to float in toward English shores when the tide was right. When the tide ebbed, the mine automatically sank to the bottom, where it waited the proper interval and then released itself again to float closer to the shore. The British were unable to figure out how the mines got there.

12 Comments »

  1. The “Japanese mind” lacks the ability to do any innovative mechanical design? Okay, that explains why none of their cars sell here and why our automobile industry needn’t worry about Japanese competition. Right? And it explains why we had such an easy time of it in the Pacific during WW2.

    The fact is, had the Japanese launched a third wave of bombers to take out the oil tanks on Ford Island and then not been caught rearming their planes during the Battle of Midway, they probably would have either won the war or, at a minimum, it would have lasted for several years longer. And it wasn’t until the second year of the war that we finally came up with torpedoes for our submarines that were as good as the ones the Japanese had invented on their own.

    One of the characteristics of hubris is a tendency to assume that one’s foes, or one’s competitors, can’t possibly do anything as well as we do and that whatever they make will be inferior to our own products. It got us in trouble then, it put our manufacturing industries in the mess we have now, and it’ll get us in trouble in the future if we don’t learn from the past.

    Comment by Eliyahu — February 5, 2009 @ 7:58 pm

  2. I think this was a fantasy at the time but it wasn’t 10 years later, when the Japanese Navy developed the Oka (Cherry Blossom) manned rocket bomb, nicknamed the “Baka (Fool)” by Allied propaganda. It should be noted that not all Japanese officer approved of suicide tactics, finding it disgraceful to order men they were responsible for to die, and that the Navy built the Oka themselves because they felt if they asked civilian aircraft manufacturers to do it, the manufacturers could have thought the Navy had lost their minds. Cheers — MrG / http://www.vectorsite.net/gblog.html

    Comment by MrG — February 5, 2009 @ 8:16 pm

  3. A fascinating article. Thank you for posting it Charlie.

    Comment by slim — February 6, 2009 @ 12:51 am

  4. It is fascinating but clearly because it says more about American attitudes towards the Japanese than about the Japanese. The Japanese have their own distinct culture but they are not from another planet. One of my favorite lines, from Masamune Shirou’s action-comedy manga DOMINION TANK POLICE: “Let’s RAM them! We’ll take them with us!” “WHAT?! You Japanese are KAMIKAZE-crazy!” Cheers — MrG / http://www.vectorsite.net/gblog.html

    Comment by MrG — February 6, 2009 @ 8:33 am

  5. I was hoping to see this article after previously seeing it on the cover. I agree, it speaks more the American attitudes towards race in 1933 than to the actual technological ability of the Japanese.

    Case in Point: The most unfortunate puppet show taking place on the last page of the article. Yikes.

    Comment by NdotM — February 6, 2009 @ 4:55 pm

  6. On the other hand — for younger folks who weren’t around up to the mid-1960s, do realize that “MADE IN JAPAN” meant “junk” and with good reason. Remember Doc’s shocked comment to Marty McFly in the first BACK TO THE FUTURE movie? By the mid-1970s that was a faint memory. Ironically, in the old days Japanese live-action movies tended towards classics — Kurosawa above all — and these days they tends toward junk, though I’ve seen some reasonable Japanese horror flics like DARK WATER. Cheers — MrG / http://www.vectorsite.net/gblog.html

    Comment by MrG — February 6, 2009 @ 9:40 pm

  7. 1933? I didn’t think the Japanese were using suicide bombers until late in the war.

    Comment by John M. Hanna — February 7, 2009 @ 12:26 am

  8. Riding a bomb? I can’t believe nobody’s mentioned “Dr. Strangelove” yet.

    Comment by nlpnt — February 8, 2009 @ 11:01 am

  9. There is still really little innovation from the Japanese mostly it’s it’s buying or “borrowing” other peoples patents and ideas. Go to any industrial conference in the US or Europe and you’ll find the Japanese there recording everything.

    The economics of the Second World War were such the the Japanese had indeed lost against the US when they attacked Pearl Harbour. It was their arrogence that prevented them from seeing it.

    http://www.combinedfleet.com/economic.htm

    Comment by JMyint — February 8, 2009 @ 11:38 am

  10. That Japanese are not innovators is something of an accepted wisdom. However, they are hardly unimaginative — try the movies of Hayou Miyazaki or Satoshi Kon (recreational drugs may be recommended for the latter), the subtly bizarre comedy series THE MELANCHOLY OF HARUHI SUZUMIYA, or the elegant “alternate universe Japanese folk tales” of MUSHI-SHI. Cheers — MrG / http://www.vectorsite.net/gblog.html

    Comment by MrG — February 8, 2009 @ 9:59 pm

  11. If riding a bomb seems fantastic, take a look at the following puppet show article! The puppets were stated as being “life-like”… we may not yet be a perfect society, but I’m happy we have for the most part abolished that kind of entertainment, and I’ll find the fullest happiness when it’s completely abolished. How we could of found such racism entertaining is truly baffling to me! And the fact that discriminatory aspects still invade entertainment in this day and age equally baffles me! Handicap jokes, fat jokes, mental illness jokes, Asian jokes, and other jokes and depictions at the expense of others, still seem to creep into our entertainment. I suppose the puppet show article after the flying bomb article compelled me to hop up on my soap box and voice my frustration. I would like to thank the host of the above article for including the full uncensored page. It reveals a glimpse into a prominent mindset in America during the 1930’s, and certainly the majority of the 1900’s in some degree or another.

    Comment by Will Davis — February 25, 2009 @ 3:13 am

  12. It’s always amused/confused me that war has “rules” at all. The point is to win the objective. If that objective is more easily achieved, and with less loss of life, by a few suicide bombs than by marching hundreds of men to their grisly death by gunfire, grenade, land mine, or bayonet, why is it considered “wrong”? By the same token, why is the assassination of leaders outlawed, other than because the leaders themselves like it that way? Again, it seems as though many lives would be spared if the issue were decided based on the fate of one man, or a man and his political allies. Instead, they sit safely away from the action and direct thousands of young people to their death, until one side or the other runs out of bodies to throw into the meat grinder and surrenders. It seems insane to me. Granted, I can’t picture myself taking something from another by force, because I’m just not wired that way. I’m not frightened of violence – it just seems pointless and counterproductive.

    Comment by Bill — March 7, 2009 @ 1:42 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Popular Posts

Recently Last 7 Days
Last 30 Days Last Year

44 queries. 1.312 seconds.