<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TV&#8217;s Magic Lantern</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/02/27/tvs-magic-lantern/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/02/27/tvs-magic-lantern/</link>
	<description>Yesterday's tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:15:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vozpit</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/02/27/tvs-magic-lantern/comment-page-1/#comment-1066394</link>
		<dc:creator>Vozpit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7289#comment-1066394</guid>
		<description>Yes, you too can be a pirate with no feet with  &quot;Scenescope&quot;!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you too can be a pirate with no feet with  &#8220;Scenescope&#8221;!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jayessell</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/02/27/tvs-magic-lantern/comment-page-1/#comment-1066261</link>
		<dc:creator>jayessell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7289#comment-1066261</guid>
		<description>An optical printer for television?
The movie &quot;Sky Captain and the World of Tomarrow&quot; was filmed with
imaginary sets and props thanks to cgi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An optical printer for television?<br />
The movie &#8220;Sky Captain and the World of Tomarrow&#8221; was filmed with<br />
imaginary sets and props thanks to cgi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toronto</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/02/27/tvs-magic-lantern/comment-page-1/#comment-1066217</link>
		<dc:creator>Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 05:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7289#comment-1066217</guid>
		<description>Is that what they used to call CromaKey is called now? 

Besides, look at matted-in movies from the &#039;60s like &#039;The 7th Voyage of Sinbad&#039; and &#039;Mary Poppins&#039; and &#039;Chitty Chitty Bang Bang&#039;. They can look horribly crude by today&#039;s standards, especially on a big screen. Frankly, they *are* better over broadcast tv as it&#039;s less distracting.

(Not to mention Dick Van Dyck&#039;s  accents can be turned down a bit. (But I love him all the same.))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that what they used to call CromaKey is called now? </p>
<p>Besides, look at matted-in movies from the &#8217;60s like &#8216;The 7th Voyage of Sinbad&#8217; and &#8216;Mary Poppins&#8217; and &#8216;Chitty Chitty Bang Bang&#8217;. They can look horribly crude by today&#8217;s standards, especially on a big screen. Frankly, they *are* better over broadcast tv as it&#8217;s less distracting.</p>
<p>(Not to mention Dick Van Dyck&#8217;s  accents can be turned down a bit. (But I love him all the same.))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/02/27/tvs-magic-lantern/comment-page-1/#comment-1066213</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 01:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7289#comment-1066213</guid>
		<description>Intriguing!
This seems to be what lumakey evolved from.
The ghostly looking superimposed actor in the bottom right-hand photo doesn&#039;t really look terribly convincing, though.
I suppose that would be covered/concealed by the over-all low quality of the broadcast video of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intriguing!<br />
This seems to be what lumakey evolved from.<br />
The ghostly looking superimposed actor in the bottom right-hand photo doesn&#8217;t really look terribly convincing, though.<br />
I suppose that would be covered/concealed by the over-all low quality of the broadcast video of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
