<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Other Typewriter Can Do This  (Apr, 1918)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/</link>
	<description>Yesterday&#039;s tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:56:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066719</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066719</guid>
		<description>Mike (comment 3): Just what I was thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike (comment 3): Just what I was thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066680</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066680</guid>
		<description>Looks like a precursor to the Enigma machine. The Oliver stands out as well as an unusual typewriter from the 1890s. I&#039;ve never actually seen a Hammond. Something I am having a hard time finding though are typewriter mechanics. I have a strong need to talk to typewriter mechanics for insight into the profession. Older the better. Anyone ever heard of a chatroom where they hang out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a precursor to the Enigma machine. The Oliver stands out as well as an unusual typewriter from the 1890s. I&#8217;ve never actually seen a Hammond. Something I am having a hard time finding though are typewriter mechanics. I have a strong need to talk to typewriter mechanics for insight into the profession. Older the better. Anyone ever heard of a chatroom where they hang out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AstroNerdBoy</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066674</link>
		<dc:creator>AstroNerdBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066674</guid>
		<description>Wow.  Amazing!  I have to own one!  ^_^

Seriously, I had no clue typewriters were so fancy back then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Amazing!  I have to own one!  ^_^</p>
<p>Seriously, I had no clue typewriters were so fancy back then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beagledad</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066667</link>
		<dc:creator>beagledad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066667</guid>
		<description>Wow . . .  even 90 years ago, people could achieve homemade bad typography!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow . . .  even 90 years ago, people could achieve homemade bad typography!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066612</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066612</guid>
		<description>J R R Tolkein used one of these machines to type work such as &quot;The Hobbit&quot; and &quot;The Lord of the Rings&quot;. As well as italics, it had special characters he needed to type in Anglo-Saxon, which was his day job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J R R Tolkein used one of these machines to type work such as &#8220;The Hobbit&#8221; and &#8220;The Lord of the Rings&#8221;. As well as italics, it had special characters he needed to type in Anglo-Saxon, which was his day job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torgo</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066607</link>
		<dc:creator>Torgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066607</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, the Russian text does not say &quot;Russian.&quot;  It says &quot;Byeunioa.&quot;  That doesn&#039;t sound like a real Russian word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, the Russian text does not say &#8220;Russian.&#8221;  It says &#8220;Byeunioa.&#8221;  That doesn&#8217;t sound like a real Russian word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Savard</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066605</link>
		<dc:creator>John Savard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066605</guid>
		<description>In fact, the word balloons in a lot of Charlton comics *were* done on a handprint-style font made for this typewriter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, the word balloons in a lot of Charlton comics *were* done on a handprint-style font made for this typewriter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nlpnt</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066602</link>
		<dc:creator>nlpnt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066602</guid>
		<description>What, no Comic Sans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, no Comic Sans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StanFlouride</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066594</link>
		<dc:creator>StanFlouride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066594</guid>
		<description>&quot;Condensed Aluminum&quot; was stamped metal and much more rugged than cast aluminum which was brittle and had a tendency to crystallize and break.

Thanks JMyint, neat link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Condensed Aluminum&#8221; was stamped metal and much more rugged than cast aluminum which was brittle and had a tendency to crystallize and break.</p>
<p>Thanks JMyint, neat link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Savard</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066586</link>
		<dc:creator>John Savard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066586</guid>
		<description>The Hammond typewriter was the original mono-spaced version of the Varityper. Fonts were on curved &quot;shoes&quot; which essentially made up somewhat less than 120 degrees of the circle.

They were up against a cylinder formed of two metal rings, one above the other. A tab extended into the cylinder, through the gap between the rings, with a hole in it. So you lifted up the cylinder to put a type shoe on, and when you put it down, a needle went through the hole; this needle slid the font from side to side for the correct letter. (The cylinder also moved up and down for shifts; the keyboard was three-bank, so you had one shift for capitals and another for numbers and symbols.)

The cylinder could have two font shoes on it, one on the front and one on the back, so in addition to lifting the cylinder to change fonts, one also lifted it to flip it over to change between the two fonts mounted on the machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hammond typewriter was the original mono-spaced version of the Varityper. Fonts were on curved &#8220;shoes&#8221; which essentially made up somewhat less than 120 degrees of the circle.</p>
<p>They were up against a cylinder formed of two metal rings, one above the other. A tab extended into the cylinder, through the gap between the rings, with a hole in it. So you lifted up the cylinder to put a type shoe on, and when you put it down, a needle went through the hole; this needle slid the font from side to side for the correct letter. (The cylinder also moved up and down for shifts; the keyboard was three-bank, so you had one shift for capitals and another for numbers and symbols.)</p>
<p>The cylinder could have two font shoes on it, one on the front and one on the back, so in addition to lifting the cylinder to change fonts, one also lifted it to flip it over to change between the two fonts mounted on the machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMyint</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066585</link>
		<dc:creator>JMyint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066585</guid>
		<description>The old Hammond typewriters had the typeface on a drum and by rotating the drum a person could change fonts. There is a video of one working along with photos and explaination of the workings here:

www.typewritermuseum.org/collection/index.php3?machine=hammond1&amp;cat=ks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old Hammond typewriters had the typeface on a drum and by rotating the drum a person could change fonts. There is a video of one working along with photos and explaination of the workings here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.typewritermuseum.org/collection/index.php3?machine=hammond1&#038;cat=ks" rel="nofollow">http://www.typewritermuseum.or.....038;cat=ks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066583</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066583</guid>
		<description>Old typewriters use to have mallets* that would come up and strike the paper, each mallet would have an uppercase and lowercase letter on it.  Pressing the shift key would raise the mallet.  Perhaps each key had several letters on it and when you adjusted the height a different section of the key would hit the paper. 

*(Not sure if mallet is the correct word)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old typewriters use to have mallets* that would come up and strike the paper, each mallet would have an uppercase and lowercase letter on it.  Pressing the shift key would raise the mallet.  Perhaps each key had several letters on it and when you adjusted the height a different section of the key would hit the paper. </p>
<p>*(Not sure if mallet is the correct word)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066582</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066582</guid>
		<description>The Selectric was a special case, with its removable typeballs. Great machines - I used to repair them (in the guise of computer printers).

This seems to be a cylinder design - turn a knob (somewhere - the woodcut is not all that clear) and it switches the font.

This was not a machine that was going to work well for a speedy typist.

BTW, whatthehell was &quot;Condensed aluminum&quot;? Some sort of alloy, no doubt..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Selectric was a special case, with its removable typeballs. Great machines &#8211; I used to repair them (in the guise of computer printers).</p>
<p>This seems to be a cylinder design &#8211; turn a knob (somewhere &#8211; the woodcut is not all that clear) and it switches the font.</p>
<p>This was not a machine that was going to work well for a speedy typist.</p>
<p>BTW, whatthehell was &#8220;Condensed aluminum&#8221;? Some sort of alloy, no doubt..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066580</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066580</guid>
		<description>The IBM Selectric comes with type balls. I once worked with a Selectric that had 24 different type balls for eight different fonts in three languages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The IBM Selectric comes with type balls. I once worked with a Selectric that had 24 different type balls for eight different fonts in three languages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066579</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066579</guid>
		<description>hmmmm, maybe this is the type writer Dan Rather was talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmmm, maybe this is the type writer Dan Rather was talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066578</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066578</guid>
		<description>Casandro, they did change their script. In Ottoman times and in the early years of the Republic, Turkish was written in Arabic script. Only in 1928 did Ataturk adopt the Turkish alphabet, which is based on the Latin alphabet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casandro, they did change their script. In Ottoman times and in the early years of the Republic, Turkish was written in Arabic script. Only in 1928 did Ataturk adopt the Turkish alphabet, which is based on the Latin alphabet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casandro</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/03/11/no-other-typewriter-can-do-this%e2%80%94/comment-page-1/#comment-1066576</link>
		<dc:creator>Casandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=7424#comment-1066576</guid>
		<description>Odd, turkish must have changed their alphabet. Now they have fairly normal letters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odd, turkish must have changed their alphabet. Now they have fairly normal letters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

