<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sixty billion vibrations per second  (May, 1956)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/19/sixty-billion-vibrations-per-second/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/19/sixty-billion-vibrations-per-second/</link>
	<description>Yesterday&#039;s tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blokeice</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/19/sixty-billion-vibrations-per-second/comment-page-1/#comment-1074419</link>
		<dc:creator>blokeice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 12:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=8479#comment-1074419</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm.... I bet it would be a really interesting combination if you combined this technology with the mechanical willy robot from one of the earlier articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm&#8230;. I bet it would be a really interesting combination if you combined this technology with the mechanical willy robot from one of the earlier articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casandro</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/19/sixty-billion-vibrations-per-second/comment-page-1/#comment-1072669</link>
		<dc:creator>Casandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=8479#comment-1072669</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, waveguide telecommunications systems. That was a dead-end for quite a while.

Waveguides have limited bandwidth (about half of the operating frequency) and fairly high loss. Plus they are tubes which are fairly rigid. Corners are a real problem.

It just got swamped by fiberoptical systems which work for many kilometers without an amplifier and provide the bandwidth of waveguide based systems for every single wavelength.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, waveguide telecommunications systems. That was a dead-end for quite a while.</p>
<p>Waveguides have limited bandwidth (about half of the operating frequency) and fairly high loss. Plus they are tubes which are fairly rigid. Corners are a real problem.</p>
<p>It just got swamped by fiberoptical systems which work for many kilometers without an amplifier and provide the bandwidth of waveguide based systems for every single wavelength.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

