<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: do you know this man?  (Mar, 1955)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/24/do-you-know-this-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/24/do-you-know-this-man/</link>
	<description>Yesterday&#039;s tomorrow, today.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:01:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/24/do-you-know-this-man/comment-page-1/#comment-1074475</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=8473#comment-1074475</guid>
		<description>Chuck Berger: I&#039;m sure that you have your own insights into writing ad copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck Berger: I&#8217;m sure that you have your own insights into writing ad copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Berger</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/24/do-you-know-this-man/comment-page-1/#comment-1074474</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=8473#comment-1074474</guid>
		<description>&quot;P.S. He may be you.&quot;

P.P.S. If you didn&#039;t already figure that out before the end of the ad, maybe you should keep your current job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;P.S. He may be you.&#8221;</p>
<p>P.P.S. If you didn&#8217;t already figure that out before the end of the ad, maybe you should keep your current job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy B</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/24/do-you-know-this-man/comment-page-1/#comment-1072960</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=8473#comment-1072960</guid>
		<description>Interesting because GD left aviation/aerospace for a while to concentrate on subs and tanks-- now they own Gulfstream.  In 1985 GD bought the Cessna company but later sold it along the the Convair units to Lockheed, during the industry consolidation post cold war/Bill Clinton presidency.

You could probably do a master&#039;s thesis on the consolidation of the defense/aerospace industry in the last 20 years; it makes for interesting &quot;strange bedfellows management/working stiff relations.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting because GD left aviation/aerospace for a while to concentrate on subs and tanks&#8211; now they own Gulfstream.  In 1985 GD bought the Cessna company but later sold it along the the Convair units to Lockheed, during the industry consolidation post cold war/Bill Clinton presidency.</p>
<p>You could probably do a master&#8217;s thesis on the consolidation of the defense/aerospace industry in the last 20 years; it makes for interesting &#8220;strange bedfellows management/working stiff relations.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/24/do-you-know-this-man/comment-page-1/#comment-1072944</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=8473#comment-1072944</guid>
		<description>Toronto: Yeah and the F-16 was designed and initially supplied by General Dynamics, but they are all manufactured by Lockheed Martin now. (Gimme a break first flight of the C-130 was 1954).

The C-130J however had it&#039;s first flight after the merger.  It&#039;s pure Lockheed Martin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toronto: Yeah and the F-16 was designed and initially supplied by General Dynamics, but they are all manufactured by Lockheed Martin now. (Gimme a break first flight of the C-130 was 1954).</p>
<p>The C-130J however had it&#8217;s first flight after the merger.  It&#8217;s pure Lockheed Martin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toronto</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/24/do-you-know-this-man/comment-page-1/#comment-1072943</link>
		<dc:creator>Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=8473#comment-1072943</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure the Herc predates the Lockheed Martin merger/takeover/whatever, and was pure Lockheed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure the Herc predates the Lockheed Martin merger/takeover/whatever, and was pure Lockheed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy B</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/24/do-you-know-this-man/comment-page-1/#comment-1072938</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=8473#comment-1072938</guid>
		<description>C-130J too, along with the F-16 Fighting Falcon. (Lockheed)
Martin also made the titan II and III rockets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C-130J too, along with the F-16 Fighting Falcon. (Lockheed)<br />
Martin also made the titan II and III rockets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firebrand38</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/24/do-you-know-this-man/comment-page-1/#comment-1072924</link>
		<dc:creator>Firebrand38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=8473#comment-1072924</guid>
		<description>Toronto: Correct, and the F-35 and a lot of other things http://www.lockheedmartin.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toronto: Correct, and the F-35 and a lot of other things <a href="http://www.lockheedmartin.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lockheedmartin.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toronto</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/24/do-you-know-this-man/comment-page-1/#comment-1072920</link>
		<dc:creator>Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=8473#comment-1072920</guid>
		<description>&quot;Martin&quot; still exists in merged form as Lockheed Martin, don&#039;t they? Maker of  the F22?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Martin&#8221; still exists in merged form as Lockheed Martin, don&#8217;t they? Maker of  the F22?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Auricchio</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/24/do-you-know-this-man/comment-page-1/#comment-1072910</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Auricchio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=8473#comment-1072910</guid>
		<description>And any sharp engineer understands that &quot;Dept S-3&quot; means the reply came from Scientific American, month 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And any sharp engineer understands that &#8220;Dept S-3&#8243; means the reply came from Scientific American, month 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy B</title>
		<link>http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2009/11/24/do-you-know-this-man/comment-page-1/#comment-1072883</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.modernmechanix.com/?p=8473#comment-1072883</guid>
		<description>Until the U.S. government cuts the funds to the program. 

It is interesting to note that the last Martin airplanes were built in the &#039;50&#039;s.

Aerospace has always been at the whims of the presidency and elected congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until the U.S. government cuts the funds to the program. </p>
<p>It is interesting to note that the last Martin airplanes were built in the &#8217;50&#8242;s.</p>
<p>Aerospace has always been at the whims of the presidency and elected congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

