April 19, 2010

Finds Universe Built of Waves (May, 1932)

Filed under: Science — @ 12:06 am
Source: Modern Mechanix ( More articles from this issue )
Issue: May, 1932
Buy on Ebay

Finds Universe Built of Waves

ANOTHER proof that the whole universe is constructed out of some mysterious kind of wave or vibration, finer in structure than the supposed ultimate particles of matter such as atoms, has been obtained by a Japanese physicist, Dr. Y. Sugiura of the Tokyo Institute of Physical and Chemical Research.

The electric particles called protons, which combine with electrons to form all known kinds of atoms, have been proved to have the properties of waves, just as was proved several years ago for electrons.

10 Comments »

  1. HA! I *knew* the universe was made out of something or other!

    Comment by Mike — April 19, 2010 @ 6:52 am

  2. That’s String Theory, isn’t it?

    Comment by jayessell — April 19, 2010 @ 8:58 am

  3. Just wait until they get into quantum mechanics– all logic goes out of the window!

    Comment by KD5ZS — April 19, 2010 @ 9:58 am

  4. Quantum mechanics dates to Max Planck’s 1900 paper on black body radiation. Schrodinger got into the fray in 1926 trying to confirm or disprove a set of equations on the wave nature of electrons.

    Comment by JMyint — April 19, 2010 @ 3:07 pm

  5. Unfortunately for the Japanese, while folks in Alamogordo were working on splitting the atom, Dr Sugira was having less luck with his attempts at splitting the wave.

    Comment by StanFlouride — April 19, 2010 @ 7:14 pm

  6. The universe has no problem dividing by zero. That the result is undefined is simply returning to its original state.

    Comment by Buddy — April 20, 2010 @ 10:08 am

  7. Buddy: Whatever that’s supposed to mean. It’s bad when you need to explain the explanation.

    Comment by Firebrand38 — April 20, 2010 @ 10:34 am

  8. Divide by zero equals infinity.

    BTW, did Schrodinger remember to put the cat out?

    Comment by KD5ZS — April 21, 2010 @ 10:02 am

  9. KD5ZS: It’s more involved than that. Reluctant as I am to use Wikipedia as a primary reference this is a useful article on the subject http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_by_zero

    I tend to the meaningless category with division by zero being an accepted construct rather than a universal law.

    My problem was him saying that the universe has no problem dividing by zero (where? when?) followed by the nonsensical “That the result is undefined is simply returning to its original state.”

    It just smacked too much of Deepak Chopra’s crap.

    Comment by Firebrand38 — April 21, 2010 @ 10:55 am

  10. My pocket calculator also has a problem dividing by zero.

    On the other hand a square root of a negative number, forming a complex number has many applications in engineering.

    Comment by KD5ZS — April 21, 2010 @ 3:32 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

21 queries. 0.909 seconds.