Comments on: WHAT IS YOUR SEX QUOTIENT (Jan, 1964)

By: Firebrand38

Firebrand38 — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 23:45:27 +0000

Hi: Wow and you chose to write that in the Sexual Quotient post. It must suck to be you (and not in a good way!).

By: Hi

Hi — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 23:41:09 +0000

Who cares. Life is worse now.

By: Fred S

Fred S — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:02:40 +0000

Wow! I’m a super genius at a 1964 sex test! 100 S.Q.!

By: Arglebarglefarglegleep

Arglebarglefarglegleep — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:43:14 +0000

And this was after doctors inventing electric devices to save them the labor of manually treating ‘hysteria’. Check out the history of it. It’s really amusing.

By: Firebrand38

Firebrand38 — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 03:47:09 +0000

Steve Smith: Yeah, just amazing (I suppose)
It’s a good thing that you can’t post pictures on this blog.

By: Steve Smith

Steve Smith — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 03:12:27 +0000

amazing that we now understand the clitoris is beneficial but we still far too often deny the foreskin and all of it’s nerve endings as well as function of the gliding foreskin are quite beneficial

By: Charlene

Charlene — Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:47:06 +0000

At this point in time it was thought that women’s pleasure in sex was mainly emotional, so orgasm didn’t really matter – for her. Keep in mind, though, that a lot of women at this point in time didn’t even know that women could have orgasms – if all you think you can ever get out of sex is some closeness, you’ll consider that “satisfaction” even if you never have an orgasm.