A Breadbox-Size Navigating System (Feb, 1980)

|<<
<< Previous
1 of 2
|<<
<< Previous
1 of 2

A Breadbox-Size Navigating System

By R.F.Gallagher

WE’RE all navigators to some degree. Navigating is simply rinding your way from one place to another and knowing where you are along the way. Usually, though, we think of navigating in terms of ships and planes.

Navigating systems have come a long way since Capt. Bligh’s famous 3,600-mi. journey on the South Seas. All he needed was a sextant because all he really wanted to do was get within sight of land. He even might have considered sailing to within miles of a pile of rocks pinpoint navigation.

That kind of accuracy isn’t good enough nowadays, of course. And hasn’t been for a long time. These days navigating means landing a craft on the moon (some 238,000 mi. away) with an accuracy down to 1/2 mi. Or orbiting a craft around the planet Jupiter (almost 400 million mi. distant) with accuracy down to 1 mi.

You may think that that kind of navigating precision has not much to do with workaday types with both feet on the ground. You may be proved wrong some years down the pike. For the Air Force’s Space and Missile Systems Organization (SAMSO) is now developing Navstar, a space-based radio navigation system—global in scope—that could provide precise navigation information by the late 1980s for users throughout the world. (A lightweight backpack model— which could be called breadbox size—has been built and is currently being tested for use by ground troops.)

The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a Dept. of Defense project, but the Air Force, Army, Navy and Marines, plus the Defense Mapping Agency, are involved. SAMSO is head honcho, or program manager.

Right now, there are four satellites orbiting the earth, the last of which was launched last December. All have been put up there by the famous Atlas family of rockets. When the project becomes fully operational, possibly in the late 1980s, the Navstar system will include 24 satellites, eight in each of three orbits. This truly artificial galaxy will circle the globe every 24 hrs., all the while beaming continuous navigation signals to earth.

SAMSO is currently working with the Federal Aviation Agency to determine the practicality and long-range use of the Navstar system in aircraft crash avoidance. Present aircraft applications are in strategic defense, with Navstar affording an all-weather, day or night global strike capability.

Another function of the system is to provide navigational fixes for missile and attack submarines which must broach the surface for as short a time as possible to avoid detection. The data received permits the craft to navigate through minefields and to pinpoint location relative to charted buoys, shoals and reefs.

The fully operational Navstar system works like this: All 24 satellites transmit individually coded, 30-sec. navigation messages simultaneously, beginning at the same time and in the same format.

The first 18 sec. contain celestial and clock data. The next segment of 6 sec. is reserved for additional messages. The final 6-sec. portion contains a course almanac for all satellites in the network.

Here on earth, the signals are received by user sets, which can be integrated with aircraft and ships or hand-held by land-based personnel.

The receiver locks onto signals from four favorably located satellites. It then processes the signals and, depending on the information sought, the user can determine his position to within tens of feet, velocity to within a fraction of a mile per hour and the time to within a millionth of a second. This information becomes available quickly with the push of a few buttons—no more difficult than punching numbers on a calculator.

The system consists of three major interlocking segments. The space segment (the orbiting satellites) broadcasts superaccurate position coordinates and timing information. The user segment (receivers) processes this information from the four best-located satellites to obtain accurate position and velocity components. The control segment (base stations on earth) tracks the satellites and continually updates their position coordinates.

The control segment consists of a Master Control Station located at Fortuna Air Force Station in North Dakota (construction is expected to begin in 1980), plus four monitor stations—in Alaska, Guam, Hawaii and at Vandenberg AFB, Calif. The monitor stations pick up signals from satellites and transmit them to the Master Control Station. These signals are used to determine and correct the errors of each satellite. The corrections are then relayed to the satellites by the Master Control Station.

The satellite itself weighs 1,673 lbs. and measures just 17-1/2 ft. from tip to tip. And, of course, its more than 33,000 parts are a wonderment of sophisticated engineering. For example, the atomic clocks used are so accurate that they gain or lose only 1 sec. in 30,000 yrs.!

The Navstar Global Positioning System, as we hinted, is a little premature for civilian use. But near-future applications involving air, sea and land vehicles abound. They include aircraft runway approaches, photomapping, geodetic surveys, aerial rendezvous and refueling, air traffic control and search & rescue operations.

Further ahead, perhaps commercial fishermen, private-plane pilots, surveyors and offshore oil-drilling outfits might plug in.

9 comments
  1. FJP says: March 5, 20091:51 am

    Wow, the article doesn’t even suggest cars as an application for GPS. I’m surprised that wasn’t one of the first things thought of. They did mention land surveying. I’ve been wondering about that for a while. Why don’t we abandon all our old fashioned ways of marking and describing property boundaries, some still dependent on marked trees or hammering a metal rod into the ground, in favor of using GPS coordinates for all property descriptions?

  2. George Trudeau says: March 5, 20099:35 am

    FJP: I’m not sure if accuracy is an issue any more. I do geocaching and all the GPS does is get me within 20 feet or so of the target. I know there are better differential receivers, but I’m not sure about the accuracy needed to determine if your neighbor has built their fence on your lawn.

    Even if we’ve got the accuracy, and repeatability, it’s going to be quite a few years before laws catch up.

  3. MrG says: March 5, 200910:35 am

    For a history:

    http://www.vectorsite.n…

    WIRED had an interesting article on apps for GPS-enabled cellphones:

    http://www.wired.com/ga…

    You mean I can locate a public toilet when I need one? COOL! MrG / http://www.vectorsite.n…

  4. Myles says: March 5, 20091:04 pm

    FJP – The early gps systems were horribly expensive, and just gave you a latitude, longitude fix. They weren’t useful for cars until moving maps came along.

  5. Al says: March 5, 20091:34 pm

    Myles: Depends on what you were using them for. I had one hooked to a laptop more than a few years ago that I regularly used to map trails in a 4-wheel-drive truck. Worked beautifully for plotting routes traveled, and the plots could then be correlated to paper maps later.

    Quite handy, actually.

    Al

  6. StanFlouride says: March 5, 20098:48 pm

    Did most people in 1980 still know how big a breadbox is? Playing 20 Questions with my now-20 y.o. daughter about 10-12 years ago I asked that classic standard, “is it bigger than a breadbox?” and she said, “I don’t know- what’s a breadbox?”

  7. John Savard says: March 5, 20099:35 pm

    I have a breadbox in my kitchen that I still use. But I have to admit, I’m still waiting for them to come out with a more accurate version of GPS that can be used for optical interferometry.

  8. hwertz says: March 9, 200911:06 pm

    Al — sure, but just doing some googling, the early-1980s GPS units were a bit over $100,000. Also no laptops in 1980, you’d either be writing it down by hand, or (if you did manage to get a computer interface for the GPS) adding on another $2000-4000 for something like a Kaypro II or Osborne (the two semi-portable systems I can think of from that era.)

    I think it honestly didn’t occur to them costs would drop from $100,000 to like $5 for a GPS receiver chip (and $150 for a nice GPS thingy with the ability to actually map and plan routes.)

  9. Al says: March 10, 20096:53 am

    Yah – those clunkers were way too expensive, even for the times. i was doing this in the late 80s/early 90s and by then the entire receiver was available as a serial port connected device specifically made for the purpose.

    Still way before moving-map software, though. :)

    Alan

Submit comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.