Miracles You’ll See In The Next Fifty Years (Feb, 1950)

This is a pretty fun article that does a pretty mediocre job of predicting the future. Must have been those damn labor-unions that held everything back. My favorite prediction is that used underwear will be recycled into candy.

Miracles You’ll See In The Next Fifty Years

By Waldemar Kaempffert

Science Editor, The New York Times

WHAT WILL the world be like in A.D. 2000? You can read the answer in your home, in the streets, in the trains and cars that carry you to your work, in the bargain basement of every department store. You don’t realize what is happening because it is a piecemeal process. The jet-propelled plane is one piece, the latest insect killer is another. Thousands of such pieces are automatically dropping into their places to form the pattern of tomorrow’s world.

The only obstacles to accurate prophecy are the vested interests, which may retard progress for economic reasons, tradition, conservatism, labor-union policies and legislation. If we confine ourselves to processes and inventions that are now being hatched in the laboratory, we shall not wander too far from reality.

The best way of visualizing the new world of A.D. 2000 is to introduce you to the Dobsons, who live in Tottenville, a hypothetical metropolitan suburb of 100,000. There are parks and playgrounds and green open spaces not only around detached houses but also around apartment houses. The heart of the town is the airport. Surrounding it are business houses, factories and hotels. In concentric circles beyond these lie the residential districts.

Tottenville is as clean as a whistle and quiet. It is a crime to burn raw coal and pollute air with smoke and soot. In the homes electricity is used to warm walls and to cook. Factories all burn gas, which is generated in sealed mines. The tars are removed and sold to the chemical industry for their values, and the gas thus laundered is piped to a thousand communities.

The highways that radiate from Tottenville are much like those of today, except that they are broader with hardly any curves. In some of the older cities, difficult to change because of the immense investment in real estate and buildings, the highways are double-decked. The upper deck is for fast nonstop traffic; the lower deck is much like our avenues, with brightly illuminated shops. Beneath the lower deck is the level reserved entirely for business vehicles.

Tottenville is illuminated by electric “suns” suspended from arms on steel towers 200 feet high. There are also lamps which are just as bright and varicolored as those that now dazzle us on every Main Street. But the process of generating the light is more like that which occurs in the sun. Atoms are bombarded by electrons and other minute projectiles, electrically excited in this way and made to glow.

Power plants are not driven by atomic power as you might suppose. It was known as early as 1950 that an atomic power plant would have to be larger and much more expensive than a fuel-burning plant to be efficient. Atomic power proves its worth in Canada, South America and the Far East, but in tropical countries it cannot compete with solar power. It is as hopeless in 2000 as it was in 1950 to drive machinery directly by atomic energy. Engineers can do no more than utilize the heat generated by converting uranium into plutonium. The heat is used to drive engines, and the engines in turn drive electric generators. A good deal of thorium is used because uranium 235 is scarce.

Because of the heavy investment that has to be made in a uranium or thorium power plant, the United States government began seriously to consider the possibilities of solar radiation in 1949. Theoretically, 5000 horsepower in terms of solar heat fall on an acre of the earth’s surface every day.

Because they sprawl over large surfaces, solar engines are profitable in 2000 only where land is cheap. They are found in deserts that can be made to bloom again, and in tropical lands where there is usually no coal or oil. Many farmhouses in the United States are heated by solar rays and some cooking is done by solar heat.

The first successful atomically driven liners began to run in 1970 after the U. S. Navy had carried on many expensive, large-scale secret experiments. Outwardly the liners are not much different from the Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth, but they have much more cargo and passenger space because it is no longer necessary to carry about 12,000 tons of fuel.

The metallurgical research that makes the gas turbines in the power plants and in the trans-Atlantic liners possible has influenced both civil engineering and architecture. Steel is used only for cutting tools and for massive machinery. The light metals have largely displaced it. Ways have been found to change the granular structure so that a metal is ultrastrong in a desired direction and weaker in other directions. As a result, the framework of an industrial or office building or apartment house is an almost lacelike lattice.

Thanks to these alloys, to plastics and to other artificial materials, houses differ from those of our own time. The Dobson house has light-metal walls only four inches thick. There is a sheet of insulating material an inch or two thick with a casing of sheet metal on both sides.

This Dobson air-conditioned house is not a prefabricated structure, though all its parts are mass-produced. Metal, sheets of plastic and aerated clay (clay filled with bubbles so that it resembles petrified sponge) are cut to size on the spot. In the center of this eight-room house is a unit that contains all the utilities—air-conditioning apparatus, plumbing, bathrooms, showers, electric range, electric outlets. Around this central unit the house has been pieced together. Some of it is poured plastic—the floors, for instance. By 2000, wood, brick and stone are ruled out because they are too expensive.

It is a cheap house. With all its furnishings, Joe Dobson paid only $5000 for it. Though it is galeproof and weatherproof, it is built to last only about 25 years. Nobody in 2000 sees any sense in building a house that will last a century.

Everything about the Dobson house is synthetic in the best chemical sense of the term. When Joe Dobson awakens in the morning he uses a depilatory. No soap or safety razor for him. It takes him no longer than a minute to apply the chemical, wipe it off with the bristles and wash his face in plain water.

This Dobson house is not as highly mechanized as you may suppose, chiefly because of the progress made by the synthetic chemists. There are no dish washing machines, for example, because dishes are thrown away after they have been used once, or rather put into a sink where they are dissolved by superheated water. Two dozen soluble plastic plates cost a dollar. They dissolve at about 250 degrees Fahrenheit, so that boiling-hot soup and stews can be served in them without inviting a catastrophe. The plastics are derived from such inexpensive raw materials as cottonseed hulls, oat hulls, Jerusalem artichokes, fruit pits, soy beans, bagasse, straw and wood pulp.

When Jane Dobson cleans house she simply turns the hose on everything. Why not? Furniture (upholstery included), rugs, draperies, unscratchable floors — all are made of synthetic fabric or waterproof plastic. After the water has run down a drain in the middle of the floor (later concealed by a rug of synthetic fiber) Jane turns on a blast of hot air and dries everything. A detergent in the water dissolves any resistant dirt. Tablecloths and napkins are made of woven paper yarn so fine that the untutored eye mistakes it for linen. Jane Dobson throws soiled “linen” into the incinerator. Bed sheets are of more substantial stuff, but Jane Dobson has only to hang them up and wash them down with a hose when she puts the bedroom in order.

Cooking as an art is only a memory in the minds of old people. A few die-hards still broil a chicken or roast a leg of lamb, but the experts have developed ways of deep-freezing partially baked cuts of meat. Even soup and milk are delivered in the form of frozen bricks.

This expansion of the frozen-food industry and the changing gastronomic habits of the nation have made it necessary to install in every home the electronic industrial stove which came out of World War II. Jane Dobson has one of these electronic stoves. In eight seconds a half-grilled frozen steak is thawed; in two minutes more it is ready to serve. It never takes Jane Dobson more than half an hour to prepare what Tottenville considers an elaborate meal of several courses.

Some of the food that Jane Dobson buys is what we miscall “synthetic.” In the middle of the 20th century statisticians were predicting that the world would starve to death because the population was increasing more rapidly than the food supply. By 2000, a vast amount of research has been conducted to exploit principles that were embryonic in the first quarter of the 20th century. Thus sawdust and wood pulp are converted into sugary foods. Discarded paper table “linen” and rayon underwear are bought by chemical factories to be converted into candy.

Of course the Dobsons have a television set. But it is connected with the telephones as well as with the radio receiver, so that when Joe Dobson and a friend in a distant city talk over the telephone they also see each other. Businessmen have television conferences. Each man is surrounded by half a dozen television screens on which he sees those taking part in the discussion. Documents are held up for examination; samples of goods are displayed. In fact, Jane Dobson does much of her shopping by television. Department stores obligingly hold up for her inspection bolts of fabric or show her new styles of clothing.

Automatic electronic inventions that seem to have something like intelligence integrate industrial production so that all the machines in a factory work as units in what is actually a single, colossal organism. In the Orwell Helicopter Corporation’s plant only a few trouble shooters are visible, and these respond to lights that flare up on a board whenever a vacuum tube burns out or there is a short circuit. By holes punched in a roll of paper, every operation necessary to produce a helicopter is indicated. The punched roll is fed into a machine that virtually gives orders to all the other machines in the plant. The holes in the paper indicate exactly how long a reamer is to smooth the inside of a cylinder, just when a stamping machine is to pass a sheet of aluminum along to its neighbor with orders to punch 22 holes in indicated places. There are mechanical wrenches that obediently turn nuts on bolts and stop all by themselves when the bolts are in place, shears that know exactly where to cut a sheet of metal for a perfect fit. Every operation in the plant is electronically and automatically controlled.

One of the more remarkable electronic machines of 2000 is a development of one on which hundreds of thousands of dollars had been spent in the middle years of the 20th century by Dr. Vladimir Zworykin and Dr. John von Neumann. The purpose of this improved Zworykin-Von Neumann automaton is to predict the weather with an accuracy unattainable before 1980. It is a combination of calculating machine and forecaster. The calculator solves thousands of separate equations in a minute; the automatic forecaster carries out the computer’s instructions and predicts the weather from hour to hour. In 1950, meteorologists had no time to deal with the 50-odd variables that should have been mathematically handled to predict the weather 24 hours in advance.

Following suggestions made by Zworykin and Von Neumann storms are more or less under control. It is easy enough to spot a budding hurricane in the doldrums off the coast of Africa. Before it has a chance to gather much strength and speed as it travels westward toward Florida, oil is spread over the sea and ignited. There is an updraft. Air from the surrounding region, which includes the developing hurricane, rushes in to fill the void. The rising air condenses so that some of the water in the whirling mass falls as rain.

With storms diverted where they do no harm, aerial travel is never interrupted. And the Dobsons, like everybody else in Tottenville, travel much more than we do in 1950—that is, to foreign countries.

By 2000, supersonic planes cover a thousand miles an hour, but the consumption of fuel is such that high fares have to be charged. In one of these supersonic planes the Atlantic is crossed in three hours. Nobody has yet circumnavigated the moon in a rocket space ship, but the idea is not laughed down.

Corporation presidents, bankers, ambassadors and rich people in a hurry use the 1000-mile-an-hour rocket planes and think nothing of paying a fare of $5000 between Chicago and Paris. The Dobsons take the cheaper jet planes.

This extension of aerial transportation has had the effect of distributing the population. People find it more satisfactory to live in a suburb like Tottenville, if suburb it can be called, than in a metropolis like New York, Chicago or Los Angeles. Cities have grown into regions, and it is sometimes hard to tell where one city ends and another begins. Instead of driving from Tottenville to California in their car—teardrop in shape and driven from the rear by a high-compression engine that burns cheap denatured alcohol—the Dobsons use the family helicopter, which is kept on the roof. The car is used chiefly for shopping and for journeys of not more than 20 miles. The railways are just as necessary in 2000 as they are in 1950. They haul chiefly freight too heavy or too bulky for air cargo carriers. Passenger travel by rail is a mere trickle. Even commuters go to the city, a hundred miles away, in huge aerial busses that hold 200 passengers. Hundreds of thousands make such journeys twice a day in their own helicopters.

Fast jet and rocket-propelled mail planes made it so hard for telegraph companies all over the world to compete with the postal service that dormant facsimile-transmission systems had to be revived. It takes no more than a minute to transmit and receive in facsimile a five-page letter on paper of the usual business size. Cost? Five cents. In Tottenville the clerks in telegraph offices no longer print out illegible words. Everything is transmitted by phototelegraphy exactly as it is written—illegible spelling, blots, smudges and all. Mistakes are the sender’s, never the telegraph company’s.

When the Dobsons are sick they go to the doctor, in a hospital, where he has only to push a button to command all the assistance he needs.

In the middle of the 20th century, doctors talked much of such antibiotics as penicillin, streptomycin, aureomycin and about 50 others that had been extracted from soil and other molds. It was the beginning of what was even then known as chemotherapy—cure by chemical means. By 2000, physicians have several hundred of these chemical agents or antibiotics at their command. Tuberculosis in all of its forms is cured as easily as pneumonia was cured at mid-century.

It no longer is necessary in 2000 to administer the purified extracts of molds to cope with bacterial infections. The antibiotics are all synthesized in chemical factories. It is possible to modify their molecular structure, so that they acquire new and useful properties.

Even in 1950 physicians did not know exactly how a piece of beefsteak is converted by the body into muscle and energy —the process technically known as metabolism. The physician of 2000 knows just what diet is best for a patient. This knowledge, coupled with his knowledge of hormones, enables him to treat old age as a degenerative disease. Men and women of 70 in A.D. 2000 look as if they were 40. Wrinkles, sagging cheeks, leathery skins are curiosities or signs of neglect. The span of life has been lengthened to 85.

In 1950 little was known about a virus beyond the fact that it could slip through a filter so fine that it would hold back any microorganism visible in the optical microscope. The electron microscope, which magnifies from 30,000 to 100,000 times and which substitutes a beam of electrons for a beam of light, has changed all this. In the viruses, little bodies have been detected with this instrument. They are virtually protein molecules. By tying together what chemists have discovered about the struc-ture of protein and what the pathologists see in the electron microscope, such virus diseases as influenza, the common cold, poliomyelitis and a dozen others are cured with ease.

Even in the 20th century hospitals were packed with instruments and machines. The hospitals of 2000 have even more. Instead of taking electrocardiographs, doctors place heart patients in front of a fluoroscopic screen, turn on the X-rays and then, with the aid of a photoelectric cell, examine every section of the heart.

Cancer is not yet curable in 2000. But physicians optimistically predict that the time is not far off when it will be cured.

The nervous diseases are linked up with electrochemical processes in 2000 in a way that is impossible in our time. Such afflictions as multiple sclerosis or palsy are no longer regarded as incurable. There are electrochemical methods of stimulating and reactivating nerves, so that victims of Parkinson’s disease are no longer objects of pity. But these sufferers from damaged or degenerate nerves are somewhat like our diabetics who must take insulin regularly to remain alive. A little battery-driven apparatus must be carried in the pocket to provide the stimulus the nerves need.

Any marked departure from what Joe -Dobson and his fellow citizens wear and eat and how they amuse themselves will arouse comment. If old Mrs. Underwood, who lives around the corner from the Dob-sons and who was born in 1920 insists on sleeping under an old-fashioned comforter instead of an aerogel blanket of glass puffed with air so that it is as light as thistledown, she must expect people to talk about her “queerness.” It is astonishing how easily the great majority of us fall into step with our neighbors. And after all, is the standardization of life to be deplored if we can have a house like Joe Dobson’s, a standardized helicopter, luxurious standardized household appointments, and food that was out of the reach of any Roman emperor?

  1. [...] “Miracles You’ll See In The Next Fifty Years” was an article featured in the “February 1950″ issue of Popular Mechanics. It was written by Waldemar Kaempffert, Science Editor at The New York Times. It’s interesting to read this 50-plus-year-old article that predicts what the world would be like today. Some interesting predictions were “No more bouts with the razor for man of tomorrow. He’ll whisk away whiskers with a chemical solution” and “Because everything in her home is waterproof, the housewife of 2000 can do her daily cleaning with a hose“. Read this fun article. Link. [...]

  2. [...] Miracles you’ll see in the next 50 years [...]

  3. [...] Miracles you’ll see in the next 50 years [...]

  4. Predicting the Future « Buttle’s World says: October 6, 200611:12 am

    [...] Here’s a valiant try at predicting life in 2000, published in 1950. It’s an object lesson in just how hard it is to predict the future. Some of the guesses are laughably wrong. And yet… Fast jet and rocket-propelled mail planes made it so hard for telegraph companies all over the world to compete with the postal service that dormant facsimile-transmission systems had to be revived. It takes no more than a minute to transmit and receive in facsimile a five-page letter on paper of the usual business size. Cost? Five cents. In Tottenville the clerks in telegraph offices no longer print out illegible words. Everything is transmitted by phototelegraphy exactly as it is written—illegible spelling, blots, smudges and all. Mistakes are the sender’s, never the telegraph company’s. [...]

  5. the magazine life ain’t me « sCa1LyWaG says: October 6, 200612:57 pm

    [...] Miracles You’ll See In The Next 50 Years – written in 1950s.. pretty good guesses. [...]

  6. [...] I love old science/how-to magazines and what they thought the future (now) would be like. Some are incredibly accurate predications, others… well, see for yourself… Popular Mechanics 1950 [Link.] [...]

  7. Ed Driscoll.com says: October 9, 20061:13 pm

    The Future’s So Bright, I Gotta Wear Shades…

    This post screams out to be Lileks fodder: Life in the 21st century, as imagined by Popular Mechanics in 1950…….

  8. [...] Atomzwerg • Nordkorea-Shop • Tarzan Panorama • Zukunft damals • animierte Zeichnungen • Zuschauer-LineRider • Malbuch für Vorgesetzte • Angestellten-Check: 1, 2 • Papagei Einstein • Spiele: Cap´n Zappy, Crazy Job, Robin Hood • ES-Fanboard (privat) [...]

  9. AnalPhilosopher says: October 10, 20067:11 pm

    Popular Mechanics…

    Here is how things appeared in 1950. (Thanks to Mark Spahn for the link. Mark wants to know where his flying car is.)…

  10. [...] “Miracles You’ll See In The Next Fifty Years” war ein Artikel, der im Februar 1950 im Magazin “Popular Mechanics” veröffentlicht wurde. Geschrieben wurde er von Waldemar Kaempffert (1877 – 1957), u.a. Autor für den Bereich “Science and Engineering” bei der New York Times. [...]

  11. Notizen aus der Provinz says: October 12, 20069:47 am

    Miracles you’ll see in the next fifty years…



  12. [...] Miracles You’ll See In The Next Fifty Years (Februar 1950) [...]

  13. The week links « The Protagonist says: October 14, 20068:24 pm

    [...] Miracles in the next 50 years? Dude, seriously all I want are the flying cars. [...]

  14. [...] Check out ModernMechanix and Tales of Future Past for more retrofuturistic eyecandy. [...]

  15. Acorn Creative says: November 5, 20068:21 am

    [...] An article from a 1950s Popular Mechanics Magazine entitled “Miracles You’ll See In The Next Fifty Years“.  Some creepy, spot-on predictions: [...]

  16. [...] Hm, ok, ich fahre also im Sommer “ökologisch korrekt” mit arschvielen, überflüssigen PS nach Bispingen zum ökologisch korrekten Skifahren (im Sommer) und genehmige mir danach einen Tomatensaft aus nach nichts schmeckenden Tomaten. Das nenne ich aktiven Klimaschutz. Es mag ja sein, dass der blitzschnelle Tesla-Roadster eine bessere Ökobilanz hat als ein heutiger dieselfressender Kleinwagen. Aber das ist gar nicht der Punkt. Es fällt nämlich nicht ein Wort darüber, dass das ressourcenverschwendende Verhalten grundsätzlich verändert werden muss. Dass gerade der Wahn, immer alles zur Verfügung haben zu wollen (Schnee im Sommer, Erdbeeren im Winter), die Katastrophe vorantreibt. Technologie soll scheinbar alles lösen, damit wir weitermachen können wie bisher. Das ist 50er/60er/70er-Jahre-Denke und klingt in 50 Jahren so naiv wie solche Visionen aus den 50er Jahren heute klingen, siehe Modern Mechanix. [...]

  17. the new shelton wet/dry says: November 21, 200612:10 pm

    [...] + Miracles You’ll See In The Next Fifty Years (written in 1950…) (cooking by solar heat, shop by telephone/television…) + Curing cancer – the future is now? + 8 Super Powers backed up by science { from Wired.com } [...]

  18. Jacob Basbøll says: January 7, 20075:00 am

    Tilbage til fremtiden…

    Flyvende huse, rengøring med haveslange og en familiehelikopter er hverdag i 2007. I hvert fald…

  19. tribe.net: blog.modernmechanix.com says: February 12, 20077:45 am

    OT: Miracles You?ll See In The Next Fifty Years (Feb, 1950)…

    See: http://blog.modernmecha………

  20. The year 2000 (In 1950) says: February 14, 200710:05 am

    [...] via Modern Mechanix Other stories breaking the silence… [...]

  21. Fremtiden at …if any? says: February 14, 200711:02 am

    [...] Forleden læste jeg en artikel i Popular Mechanics. Den var fra 1950 og handlede om hvordan verden ville se ud ved Ã¥rtusindskiftet. Her var flyvende biler, planlagte byer med lige gader, telefoner med indbygget fjernsyn og heliports til samtlige husstande. Det er klart at forfatterne ikke ramte særlig præcist i deres forudsigelse, men som læser fra Ã¥r 2000+ var det ogsÃ¥ slÃ¥ende at forudsigelserne var fanget i deres egen tid. Verdenen som artiklen beskrev var sÃ¥ at sige en harmonisk, teknologisk videreudviklet og moderniseret udgave af 50′erne. Artiklen handlede ikke om fremtiden, men de forhÃ¥bninger og forventninger man hÃ¥bede den ville bringe tilbage i 50′erne. [...]

  22. [...] I came across this article earlier today, and I thought it was funny. It attempted to predict what the year 2000 would be like, in the year 1950. Some of the funniest parts include the prediction that underwear could be recycled into candy, and we’ll eat sawdust instead of normal meals. [...]

  23. steeefan » The Next Fifty Years says: February 24, 20072:26 am

    [...] Ausblick auf die nächsten 50 Jahre aus dem Jahre 1950, also bis ins Jahr 2000, findet ihr bei Modern Mechanix. Interessant, wie man [...]

  24. Back to the Future! « lomperikken says: March 10, 20078:27 am

    [...] to the Future! Erg gaaf om te zien hoe men 50 jaar geleden in de US van A dacht hoe het er nu aan toe zou gaan… ik heb me in [...]

  25. puttputt says: May 11, 200712:54 pm



  26. [...] seen a few articles on visions of the future from the 1950s that didn’t exactly come true. This one from Modern Mechanix is one of the best, as is the site itself (”Yesterday’s tomorrow, [...]

  27. Ernesto Schuetz says: August 7, 200711:56 am

    “You can read the answer in your home, in the streets” LOL

  28. [...] en la red de redes un librillo que se publicó en el año 1950, casualmente, que hace un poco de Rapel, me explico, intenta [...]

  29. bass says: August 20, 20075:16 am

    By 2000, supersonic planes cover a thousand miles an hour, but the consumption of fuel is such that high fares have to be charged. In one of these supersonic planes the Atlantic is crossed in three hours. Nobody has yet circumnavigated the moon in a rocket space ship, but the idea is not laughed down.

  30. [...] afternoon I was reading predictions of what life in the 21st century would be like, written in 1950. Of course, the society and culture [...]

  31. Jeffery Wright says: October 24, 20075:34 am

    you’ll eat food, from sawdust!
    -no, you’ll eat food from sawdust…

    you’ll shop by picture phone!
    -does this thing get porn?

    you’ll cook on a solar range!
    -its been three days, mom, is dinner ready yet?

  32. [...] read more | digg story [...]

  33. KENDALL says: November 7, 20077:11 am


  34. NikFromNYC says: January 12, 20087:23 pm


    “big bucks for your panties! – m4w – 34 (Greenwich Village)

    Reply to: pers-536699196@craigsli…
    Date: 2008-01-12, 11:22AM EST

    well, “big bucks” means different things to different people. but is this easy money or what? just meet me, take them off, done in 5 minutes.

    me, i’m a young white executive living in downtown manhattan, 34 years old, totally normal and actually very good looking! i’m thin, 6′ tall, light eyes dark hair. not a creep!

    the rookies and the curious are welcome to reply!”

  35. Toekomstdenken in 1950 « Sereniteit says: April 2, 20086:45 am

    [...] deze Engelstalige blog kunnen we zien hoe onze grootouders de toekomst zagen. Het is fascinerend om te lezen: huizen zijn [...]

  36. …if any? » Fremtiden says: July 12, 20086:37 am

    [...] FremtidenFebruary 14th 2007Forleden læste jeg en artikel i Popular Mechanics. Den var fra 1950 og handlede om hvordan verden ville se ud ved årtusindskiftet. Her var flyvende [...]

  37. [...] Friday February 9, 2007 Check out predictions as written by the science editor of the NY Times in the February 1950 of Popular Mechanics. [...]

  38. [...] En febrero del año 1950 la revista americana de ciencia y tecnología Popular Mechanics dedicó un artículo a los “milagros” que serían una realidad en 50 años y que nos harían la vida más fácil. Ahora que se ha cumplido el plazo se puede decir que como videntes no tienen precio… aunque también es cierto que en algunos casos sí acertaron. He seleccionado sólo algunos de los inventos que se supone que a día de hoy ya deberíamos disfrutar, pero ninguno tiene desperdicio (podéis verlos aquí). [...]

  39. [...] En febrero del año 1950 la revista americana de ciencia y tecnología Popular Mechanics dedicó un artículo a los “milagros” que serían una realidad en 50 años y que nos harían la vida más fácil. Ahora que se ha cumplido el plazo se puede decir que como videntes no tienen precio… aunque también es cierto que en algunos casos sí acertaron. He seleccionado sólo algunos de los inventos que se supone que a día de hoy ya deberíamos disfrutar, pero ninguno tiene desperdicio (podéis verlos aquí). [...]

  40. [...] Spass beim Lesen, hier der Link. (No Ratings Yet)  Loading … Category: Just 4 fun, Wissenschaft You can follow any [...]

  41. [...] Following our visit to the Weald and Downland Museum in Singleton, I have been considering how the needs of society may change over time.  To suggest how hap-hazard this might be, I uncovered this extract from Popular Mechanics, February 1950.  It attempts to predict life in the year 2000…http://blog.modernmechanix.com/2006/10/05/miracles-youll-see-in-the-next-fifty-years/ [...]

  42. FJP says: May 24, 20098:37 pm

    Leaving aside the obligatory George Jetsonisms (personal helicopters and so on), it’s interesting how important recycling, clean air and alternative energy was in this vision of the future. They predict nuclear ships just a few years before the N.S. Savannah made atomic powered ships a reality, yet we abandoned the idea and now burn diesel to ship junk from China to Walmart. I think the writers way overestimated the public’s willingness to live in an environment where nothing was permanent and everything could be washed off with a hose.

  43. hammered silver says: May 31, 200912:24 pm

    Please, can you PM me and tell me few more thinks about this, I am really fan of your blog…

  44.       |>> Zukunft says: September 26, 200911:30 pm

    [...] Wortherkunft, Synonyme, Übersetzungen und Grammatik Wikiquote: Zukunft – ZitateMiracles You’ll See In The Next Fifty Years Zukunftsvorstellungen von 1950 über das Jahr 2000 (englisch)Long Now Foundation Stiftung für [...]

  45. [...] would replace librarians by the year 2000. Popular Mechanics, the magazine, predicted talking houses and sawdust food by 2000. Things just don’t happen quite that fast. Not even in this age of [...]

  46. [...] you want to check out the February 1950 Issue of Popular Mechanics, this blog has a nice layout of the pages. And before you comment, I am aware Popular Mechanics revisited the subject in 2000 with another set [...]

  47. [...] you want to check out the February 1950 Issue of Popular Mechanics, this blog has a nice layout of the pages. And before you comment, I am aware Popular Mechanics revisited the subject in 2000 with another set [...]

  48. blokeice says: January 13, 201011:17 am

    the prediction about thorium taking over when uranium 235 becomes scarce actually looks like it might come to fruition soon, thorium plants are safer and do not produce any dangerous nuclear waste (thorium when not undergoing fission is rather safe. There was recently and article in Scientific American detailing this.

  49. carlm says: January 15, 20107:09 am

    While the transistor had already been invented “in the mid twentieth century” . The factory of the future is running on vacuum tubes. It’s those damn unions!

  50. Firebrand38 says: January 15, 201012:44 pm

    carlm: Not really. By the time that this article was written the transistor at Bell Labs was still a desk top experiment. http://www.sciencefrida… Since the February 1950 issue is published in Jan 1950 and the article had to go through the editorial process before that, it pushes us back to a period in time where we weren’t sure where transistors were going to wind up.

  51. Notizen aus der Provinz says: February 5, 20108:51 am

    Miracles you’ll see in the next fifty years…

    Kurzfassung Original…

  52. [...] imagine an entire city filled with people driving these things? Not only is it hilariously like the visions of the year 2000 of the 1950s, it’s a totally awesome picture. A bunch of zero-emissions (read: much quieter and much nicer [...]

  53. [...] powered suits, eat food pills, drive personal rockets to work, live under electric powered suns and recycle their underwear into candy(!). There is a valuable if highly limited role for such blue sky thinking. We need dreamers to [...]

  54. jayessell says: June 25, 20101:38 pm

    Did anyone live next to an airport in the 1950s? (Or should I say ‘late 1940s’?)
    If jets were noisier than prop planes, how much noisier would a rocket be?
    I can’t imagine puting the airport in the center of town!

    (To our pals in the armed forces, how do you sleep with the helicopters
    and other aircraft taking off and landing day and night?)

  55. Arglebarglefarglegleep says: August 9, 20106:52 pm

    Actually this article didn’t do too badly. It caught on to the economic problems of supersonic public transport [other than the sonic boom]. They predict the Aerospace plane and peg the type of people to use it. We might not have it now, but it’s something that was tried to be created in the 90’s. The sawdust to food isn’t too far off as we’re trying to make cellulose wastes [sawdusts, rice and wheat straw] into more digestible forms for both cattle and ethanol manufacture. It’s interesting they mention ‘aerogel’ blankets at the end – something that’s pretty intensely studied right now but not as bedding. They get the idea that Fax machines will have their day, but not that they’ll be almost as common as typewriters at one point. [In Japan, they seem to have become a home appliance like answering machines were here.] My mother’s favorite prediction was the house you could hose clean. She’d have loved to haul out a sprinkler and clean house. As I pointed out to her, all you’d have to do is make a fully tiled house, live with outdoor furniture and make the cabinets and closets water tight. For some reason, she didn’t like that suggestion.

    One thing I’ve found incredibly stupid in US house designs there’s no floor drain in case of broken pipes or kids overflowing sinks and tubs. Frankly, I’d rather take a power washer to a bathroom than scrub it by hand.

  56. jayessell says: August 12, 20103:08 pm

    Give the entire room a slant and have a gutter/drain at the side.

  57. M.S.W. says: August 20, 201012:39 pm

    Hmmm… Wonder if this is where Disney got his inspiration for EPCOT? EPCOT looks very much like this minus Walt’s addition of a fully enclosed themed mall at the center of the inner hub.

  58. StevnJessie1 says: August 30, 201010:03 am

    reminds me of a junior high project to create your interpretation of the cicyt of the future. Mine had a glass dome and laser beams for some reason.

  59. StevnJessie1 says: August 30, 201010:05 am

    after seeing the text-messaging gumdrops on the road, i am so glad we don’t have jet-packs.

  60. Arglebarglefarglegleep says: August 30, 201012:25 pm

    Jayessell; From some of my reading, some countries do exactly that, make the floor properly drained. I’ve read some countries also go wildly the other direction so far as to put in wall to wall carpet in the bathroom. Damned if I can remember which is where so don’t quote me.

    StevnJessie1; re jet packs; they’re for sale http://www.csmonitor.co… & http://gammasquad.uprox…
    Now your vacation plans can be interrupted by a thrill seeker being ingested by the aircraft engine

  61. jacqueline says: December 7, 20106:32 pm

    in fifty years will there be any disasters that we will have to worry about?

  62. jayessell says: December 12, 20105:21 pm

    There might be countries someplace based on an unsustainable premise.
    They may reach the point where juggling the books, lying to their citizens and themselves
    no longer works.
    That can’t be good worldwide.

  63. jayessell says: February 1, 20119:58 am

    Hey! #64 was meant for USA, but works for Egypt!
    Pretty good prediction for 6 weeks ago!

  64. The Future… | The Hinky Meter says: March 6, 20117:08 am

    [...] they do called “Miracles you’ll see in the next 50 years”.  Here’s just one example from February, 1950.  As you read through the pages you’ll see a lot of fantastical (downright nonsensical) [...]

  65. [...] [...]

  66. Week Five | createchae says: April 6, 20112:26 am

    [...] 2. Popular Mechanics, Feb 1950, Mircales You’ll See In The Next Fifty Years http://blog.modernmecha… [...]

  67. [...] to gaze into the future can be an amusing pastime. Generally predictions of how the world will look in a few years from now turn out to be dramatically wrong. It’s [...]

  68. [...] Miracles you will see in the next 50 years (February 1950). [...]

  69. [...] These predictions from the February 1950 issue of Popular Mechanics take the cake! Via Modern Mechanix. [...]

  70. [...] [...]

  71. What does technology and DK do for you? says: March 4, 20133:34 pm

    [...] sure if this was actually an article form 1950, way before I was born, however: Miracles You***8217;ll See In The Next Fifty Years | Modern Mechanix though it does make quite interesting reading, certainly in some areas at least. [...]

  72. Techstyle | text {isle} says: April 28, 20139:39 pm

    [...] Kaempffert in 1950.  Really.  And underwear that would be recycled into candy.  Read his article from the February 1950 issue of Popular Mechanics speculating about life in 2000; it will entertain [...]

  73. […] sprawl and clogged freeways, it is easy to understand how, in 1950, a Popular Mechanics article by former New York times Science Editor, Waldemar Kaempffert envisioned an improved future 50 years […]

  74. […] To read Waldemar Kaempffert’s entire article click here. […]

  75. […] Im Jahr 1950 veröffentlichte die New York Times den aus heutiger Sicht sehr lustigen Artikel “Miracles you’ll see in the next fifty years”. Nach Vorstellungen des Autors würden im Jahr 2000 zwar noch keine Astronauten auf dem Mond […]

  76. […] Mechanics, the incredibly-named Waldemar Kaempffert, then science editor of The New York Times, envisioned a future in which everything is either disposable or recyclable. To illustrate his point, he came […]

  77. […] Concorde dejó de ser utilizado. La revista Popular Mechanics publica un artículo titulado “Miracles You’ll See In The Next Fifty Years” que también traza los contornos de un dispositivo que podría ser comparado con Internet […]

Submit comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.